Skip to main content
Log in

Physiological comparison between non-athletes, endurance, power and team athletes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We hypothesized that endurance athletes have lower muscle power than power athletes due to a combination of weaker and slower muscles, while their higher endurance is attributable to better oxygen extraction, reflecting a higher muscle oxidative capacity and larger stroke volume. Endurance (n = 87; distance runners, road cyclists, paddlers, skiers), power (n = 77; sprinters, throwers, combat sport athletes, body builders), team (n = 64; basketball, soccer, volleyball) and non-athletes (n = 223) performed a countermovement jump and an incremental running test to estimate their maximal anaerobic and aerobic power (VO2max), respectively. Dynamometry and M-mode echocardiography were used to measure muscle strength and stroke volume. The VO2max (L min−1) was larger in endurance and team athletes than in power athletes and non-athletes (p < 0.05). Athletes had a larger stroke volume, left ventricular mass and left ventricular wall thickness than non-athletes (p < 0.02), but there were no significant differences between athlete groups. The higher anaerobic power in power and team athletes than in endurance athletes and non-athletes (p < 0.001) was associated with a larger force (p < 0.001), but not faster contractile properties. Endurance athletes (20.6%) had a higher (p < 0.05) aerobic:anaerobic power ratio than controls and power and team athletes (14.0–15.3%). The larger oxygen pulse, without significant differences in stroke volume, in endurance than power athletes indicates a larger oxygen extraction during exercise. Power athletes had stronger, but not faster, muscles than endurance athletes. The similar VO2max in endurance and team athletes and similar jump power in team and power athletes suggest that concurrent training does not necessarily impair power or endurance performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BFmax :

Maximal breathing frequency

BM:

Body mass

BMI:

Body Mass Index

CV:

Coefficient of variation

EF:

Ejection fraction

FEV1 :

Forced expiratory volume in one second

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

Hb:

Hemoglobin

HR:

Heart rate

LV:

Left ventricle

LVM:

Left ventricular mass

MVC:

Maximal voluntary contraction torque

PEF:

Predicted peak expiratory flow

RWT:

Relative left cardiac ventricle wall thickness

RWT:

Relative left ventricular wall thickness

SV:

Stroke volume

VEmax :

Maximal pulmonary ventilation

VO2max:

Maximal oxygen uptake

VTmax :

Tidal volume

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants for taking part in the study.

Funding

The study was funded by the Lithuanian Sports University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HD, AS, AS, BS, and TV conceived the study and collected the data. HD and TV performed the analyses. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomas Venckunas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Guido Ferretti.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Degens, H., Stasiulis, A., Skurvydas, A. et al. Physiological comparison between non-athletes, endurance, power and team athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 119, 1377–1386 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04128-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04128-3

Keywords

Navigation