Influence of fascicle length on twitch potentiation of the medial gastrocnemius across three ankle angles

  • Samantha L. Kuzyk
  • Rowan R. Smart
  • Carey L. Simpson
  • Andrey Fedorov
  • Jennifer M. Jakobi
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Length dependence of post-activation potentiation (PAP) is a well-established phenomenon in animal models but less certain in intact whole human muscles. Recent advances in B-mode ultrasonography provide real-time imaging and evaluation of human muscle fascicles in vivo, thus removing the assumption that joint positioning alters fascicle length and influences the extent of PAP. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a conditioning maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) would influence the return of medial gastrocnemius (MG) fascicles to baseline length and alter the extent of twitch potentiation between three ankle positions.

Methods

Ultrasonography was used to measure MG fascicle length for baseline and potentiated twitches at angles of 10° dorsiflexion (DF), 0° neutral (NEU—tibia perpendicular to the sole of the foot), and 20° plantar flexion (PF). A MVC was used as a conditioning contraction and PAP determined for each ankle angle.

Results

PAP of the plantar flexors was greater in PF (28.8 ± 2.6%) compared to NEU (19.8 ± 1.8%; p < 0.05) and DF (9.3 ± 2.8%; p < 0.0001). In PF, fascicle lengths (4.64 ± 0.17 cm) were shorter than both NEU (5.78 ± 0.15 cm; p < 0.0001) and DF (6.09 ± 0.15 cm; p < 0.0001). Fascicle lengths for the baseline twitches were longer (5.92 ± 0.11 cm) than the potentiated twitches (5.83 ± 0.10 cm; p < 0.01) at all joint angles.

Conclusion

Although PAP is greatest in PF compared to NEU and DF, the higher PAP in the PF joint angle cannot be attributed to fascicles remaining shortened following the MVC because across all joint positions, fascicles are similarly shortened following the MVC.

Keywords

Ultrasound Maximal voluntary contraction Fascicle length Post-activation potentiation 

Abbreviations

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

AT

Achilles tendon

Avg. fall

Average fall

Avg. rise

Average rise

DF

Dorsiflexion

HRT

Half relaxation time

MG

Medial gastrocnemius

MTJ

Muscle–tendon junction

MVC

Maximal voluntary contraction

NEU

Neutral

PAP

Post-activation potentiation

PF

Plantar flexion

PT

Peak tension

TPT

Time to peak tension

US

Ultrasound

VA

Voluntary activation

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Noelannah Neubauer for her contribution to the subset of soleus data presented in this manuscript, and to the anonymous reviewers for their detailed feedback that assisted in improving the paper.

Author contributions

JMJ, RRS and SLK conceived and designed the study; SLK, RRS and AF collected and analyzed the data; JMJ, SLK, RRS and CLS interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript; JMJ edited the manuscript; JMJ, SLK and CLS edited and addressed reviewer comments; JMJ approved the final version.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abellaneda S, Guissard N, Duchateau J (2009) The relative lengthening of the myotendinous structures in the medial gastrocnemius during passive stretching differs among individuals. J Appl Physiol 106:169–177.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.90577.2008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arampatzis A, Karamanidis K, Stafilidis S et al (2006) Effect of different ankle- and knee-joint positions on gastrocnemius medialis fascicle length and EMG activity during isometric plantar flexion. J Biomech 39:1891–1902.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arampatzis A, Mademli L, De Monte G, Walsh M (2007) Changes in fascicle length from rest to maximal voluntary contraction affect the assessment of voluntary activation. J Biomech 40:3193–3200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.04.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baudry S, Lecoeuvre G, Duchateau J (2012) Age-related changes in the behavior of the muscle-tendon unit of the gastrocnemius medialis during upright stance. J Appl Physiol 112:296–304.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00913.2011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fowles JR, Green HJ (2003) Coexistence of potentiation and low-frequency fatigue during voluntary exercise in human skeletal muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 81:1092–1100.  https://doi.org/10.1139/y03-114 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fukunaga T, Ichinose Y, Ito M, Kawakami Y, Fukashiro S (1997) Determination of fascicle length and pennation in a contracting human muscle in vivo. J Appl Physiol 82:354–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hagbarth BYK, Hagglund JV, Nordin M, Wallin EU (1985) Thixotropic behaviour of human finger flexor muscles with accompanying chnages in spindle and reflex responses to stretch. J Physiol 368:323–342CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Holt NC, Azizi E (2014) What drives activation-dependent shifts in the force-length curve? Biol Lett 10:20140651–20140651.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0651 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jakobi JM, Rice CL (2002) Voluntary muscle activation varies with age and muscle group. J Appl Physiol 93:457–462.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00012.2002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kawakami Y, Ichinose Y, Fukunaga T (1998) Architectural and functional features of human triceps surae muscles during contraction. J Appl Physiol 85:398–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T (2002) Effect of stretching training on the viscoelastic properties of human tendon structures in vivo. J Appl Physiol 92:595–601.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00658.2001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. MacIntosh BR (2010) Cellular and whole muscle studies of activity dependent potentiation. Adv Exp Med Biol 682:315–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. MacIntosh BR (2017) Recent developments in understanding the length dependence of contractile response of skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 117:1059–1071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Maffiuletti NA (2010) Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol 110(2):223–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayfield DL, Lichtwark GA, Cronin NJ et al (2015) Doublet potentiation in the triceps surae is limited by series compliance and dynamic fascicle behavior. J Appl Physiol 119:807–816.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00403.2015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore RL, Stull JT (1984) Myosin light chain phosphorylation in fast and slow skeletal muscles in situ. Am J Physiol 247:C462-71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Moore RL, Houston ME, Stull JT, Iwamoto GA (1985) Phosphorylation of rabbit skeletal muscle myosin in situ. J Cell Physiol 125:301–305.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041250219 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Leary DD, Hope K, Sale DG (1997) Posttetanic potentiation of human dorsiflexors. J Appl Physiol 83:2131–2138.  https://doi.org/10.1139/y98-108 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Oda T, Himeno R, Hay CD et al (2007a) In vivo behavior of muscle fascicles and tendinous tissues in human tibialis anterior muscle during twitch contraction. J Biomech 40:3114–3120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.03.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Oda T, Himeno R, Hay CD et al (2007b) In vivo behavior of muscle fascicles and tendinous tissues of human gastrocnemius and soleus muscles during twitch contraction. J Biomech 40:3114–3120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.03.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Patel JR, Diffee GM, Huang XP, Moss RL (1998) Phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain eliminates force-dependent changes in relaxation rates in skeletal muscle. Biophys J 74:360–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77793-8 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Peltonen J, Cronin NJ, Stenroth L et al (2013) Viscoelastic properties of the Achilles tendon in vivo. Springerplus 2:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Place N, Maffiuletti NA, Ballay Y, Lepers R (2005) Twitch potentiation is greater after a fatiguing submaximal isometric contraction performed at short vs. long quadriceps muscle length. J Appl Physiol 98:429–436.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00664.2004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rassier DE, MacIntosh BR (2000) Length dependence of staircase potentiation: interactions with caffeine and dantrolene sodium. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 78:350–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rassier DE, MacIntosh BR (2002) Length-dependent twitch contractile characteristics of skeletal muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 80:993–1000.  https://doi.org/10.1139/Y02-127 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rassier DE, Tubman LA, MacIntosh BR (1997) Length-dependent potentiation and myosin light chain phosphorylation in rat gastrocnemius muscle. Am J Physiol 273:C198-204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sale DG (2002) Postactivation potentiation: role in human performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30:138–143.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2002.003392 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Simpson CL, Kim BDH, Bourcet MR et al (2017) Stretch training induces unequal adaptation in muscle fascicles and thickness in medial and lateral gastrocnemii. Scand J Med Sci Sport 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12822 Google Scholar
  29. Smith JC, Fry AC (2007) Effects of a 10-s maximum voluntary contraction on regulatory myosin light-chain phosphorylation and dynamic performance measures. Strength Cond 21:73–76.  https://doi.org/10.1519/R-19485.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stuart DS, Lingley MD, Grange RW, Houston ME (1988) Myosin light chain phosphorylation and contractile performance of human skeletal muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 66:49–54.  https://doi.org/10.1139/y88-009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sweeney HL, Stull JT (1986) Phosphorylation of myosin in permeabilized mammalian cardiac and skeletal muscle cells. Am J Physiol 250:C657-60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sweeney HL, Stull JT (1990) Alteration of cross-bridge kinetics by myosin light chain phosphorylation in rabbit skeletal muscle: implications for regulation of actin-myosin interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:414–418.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.1.414 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tillin NA, Bishop D (2009) Factors modulating post-activation potentiation and its effects on performance. Sport Med 39:147–166.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0274-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vandervoort AA, Quinlan J, McComas AJ (1983) Twitch potentiation after voluntary contraction. Exp Neurol 81:141–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(83)90163-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang Z, Stull JT, Levine RJ, Sweeney HL (1998) Changes in interfilament spacing mimic the effects of myosin regulatory light chain phosphorylation in rabbit psoas fibers. J Struct Biol 122:139–148.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.1998.3979 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Healthy Exercise and Aging Lab Group, School of Health and Exercise SciencesUniversity of British Columbia OkanaganKelownaCanada

Personalised recommendations