Skip to main content

Improvement in functional performance with high-speed power training in older adults is optimized in those with the highest training velocity

Abstract

Purpose

To identify whether variability in limb movement velocity during high-speed power training (HSPT) may impact physical functioning in older adults.

Methods

42 older men and women (71.3 ± 6.6 years) were randomized to lower extremity HSPT (n = 28) or control (CON; n = 14) (Analysis 1) for 12 weeks. A second analysis (Analysis 2) allocated HSPT into high-velocity (n = 14) or low-velocity (n = 14) based on a limb movement speed above or below the median average velocity during the 12-week HSPT intervention. Habitual gait speed, maximal gait speed, timed up-and-go, and the short physical performance battery were measured at baseline and 12 weeks. Change scores were compared between HSPT and CON (Analysis 1), and high-velocity, low-velocity, and CON (Analysis 2) using ANCOVA. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05.

Results

Analysis 1 There were no group differences in habitual gait speed, maximal gait speed, or timed up-and-go between HSPT and CON (all p > 0.05). Short physical performance battery was greater in HSPT (0.96 ± 0.19) compared to CON (0.10 ± 0.26; p = 0.01). Analysis 2 There were no group differences in the change in habitual GS (p = 0.33) among high-velocity, low-velocity and CON. There were significant group differences in the change in maximal GS (p = 0.007), timed up-and-go (p = 0.03), and short physical performance battery (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

There is considerable variation in self-selected maximal limb velocity during HSPT in older adults. In the present cohort, an average limb velocity of 0.88 m/s during HSPT was necessary to ensure optimal improvement in functional performance for older adults, but this threshold will need further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Abbreviations

1RM:

One-repetition maximum

ANCOVA:

Analysis of covariance

AV:

Average velocity

BMI:

Body mass index

CON:

Control

GDS:

Geriatric depression scale

GS:

Gait speed (habitual and maximal)

HI-V:

High-velocity training group within HSPT with limb movement speed >0.88 m/s

HSPT:

High-speed power training

ICC:

Intraclass correlation

KE:

Knee extension

LO-V:

Low-velocity training group within HSPT with limb movement speed <0.88 m/s

LP:

Leg press

MEDS:

Number of medications taken

MMSE:

Mini-mental state examination

RT:

Resistance training

SPPB:

Short physical performance battery

TUG:

Timed up-and-go

References

  1. Barry BK, Carson RG (2004) The consequences of resistance training for movement control in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borg G (1970) Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 2:92–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bottaro M, Machado SN, Nogueira W, Scales R, Veloso J (2007) Effect of high versus low-velocity resistance training on muscular fitness and functional performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 99:257–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchner DM, Larson EB, Wagner EH, Koepsell TD, de Lateur BJ (1996) Evidence for a non-linear relationship between leg strength and gait speed. Age Ageing 25:386–391

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caserotti P (2010) Strength training in older adults: changes in mechanical muscle function and functional performance. Open Sports Sci J 3:62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Vos NJ, Singh NA, Ross DA, Stavrinos TM, Orr R, Fiatarone Singh MA (2008) Effect of power-training intensity on the contribution of force and velocity to peak power in older adults. J Aging Phys Act 16:393–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fielding RA, LeBrasseur NK, Cuoco A, Bean J, Mizer K, Fiatarone Singh MA (2002) High-velocity resistance training increases skeletal muscle peak power in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:655–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleiss J (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fritz SL, Lusardi MM (2010) White paper: walking speed: the sixth vital sign. J Geriatr Phys Ther 32:2–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferruci L et al (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49:M85–M94

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF et al (2000) Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: Consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol 55A:M221–M231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hakkinen K, Kallinen M, Izquierdo M, Jokelainen K, Lassila H, Malkia E, Kraemer WJ, Newton RU, Alen M (1998) Changes in agonist-antagonist EMG, muscle CSA, and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people. J Appl Physiol 84:1341–1349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Henwood TR, Taaffe DR (2005) Improved physical performance in older adults undertaking a short-term programme of high-velocity resistance training. Gerontology 51:108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Henwood TR, Riek S, Taaffe DR (2008) Strength versus muscle power-specific resistance training in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jandacka D, Beremlijski P (2011) Determination of strength exercise intensities based on the load-power velocity relationship. J Hum Kinet 28:33–44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jidovtseff B, Quie`vre J, Hanon C, Crielaard JM (2009) Inertial muscular profiles allow a more accurate training loads definition. Sci Sport 24:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Katula JA, Rejeski WJ, Marsh AP (2008) Enhancing quality of life in older adults: a comparison of muscular strength and power training. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:45

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Keysor JJ, Jette AM (2001) Have we oversold the benefit of late-life exercise? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M412–M423

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Latham NK, Bennett DA, Stretton CM, Anderson CS (2004) Systematic review of progressive resistance strength training in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59:48–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lusardi MM (2003) Functional performance in community living older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 26:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mann JB, Ivey PA, Sayers SP (2015) Velocity-based training in football. Strength Cond J 37:52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marsh AP, Miller ME, Rejeski WJ, Hutton SL, Kritchevsky SB (2009) Lower extremity muscle function after strength or power training in older adults. J Aging Phys Act 17:416–443

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. McDonagh MJN, Davies CTM (1984) Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loads. Eur J Appl Physiol 52:139–155

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi MM (2015) Walking speed: the functional vital sign. J Aging Phys Act 23:314–322. doi:10.1123/japa.2013-0236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Orr R, de Vos NJ, Singh NA, Ross DA, Stavrinos TM, Fiatarone-Singh MA (2006) Power training improves balance in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:78–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pereira A, Izquierdo M, Silva AJ, Costa AM, Bastos E, Gonzalex-Badillo JJ, Marques MC (2012) Effects of high-speed power training on functional capacity and muscle performance in older women. Exp Gerontol 47:250–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Piirainen JM, Cronin NJ, Avela J, Linnamo V (2014) Effects of plyometric and pneumatic explosive strength training on neuromuscular function and dynamic balance control in 60–70 year old males. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 24:246–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed “Up & Go”: a test if basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142–148

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reid KF, Callahan DM, Carabello RJ, Phillips EM, Frontera WR, Fielding RA (2008) Lower extremity power training in elderly subjects with mobility limitations: a randomized controlled trial. Aging Clin Exp Res 20:337–343

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Reid KF, Martin KI, Doros G, Clark DJ, Hau C, Patten C et al (2015) Comparative effects of light or heavy resistance power training for improving lower extremity power and physical performance in mobility-limited older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 70:374–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roman RA (1986) The training of the weightlifter. Sportivny Press, Moscow, pp 40–74

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sayers SP (2007) High-speed power training: a novel approach to resistance training in older men and women. A brief review and pilot study. J Strength Cond Res 21:518–526

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sayers SP, Gibson K (2010) A comparison of high-speed power training and traditional slow-speed resistance training in older men and women. J Strength Cond Res 24:3369–3380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sayers SP, Gibson K (2012) Effects of high-speed power training on muscle performance and braking speed in older adults. J Aging Res 2012:426278

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sayers SP, Gibson K (2014) High-speed power training in older adults: a shift of the external resistance at which peak power is produced. J Strength Cond Res 28:616–621

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sayers SP, Gibson K, Cook CR (2012) Effect of high-speed power training on muscle performance, function, and pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: a pilot investigation. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M (2000) Predicting the probability for falls in community dwelling older adults using the timed up & go test. Phys Ther 80:896–903

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Siff MC (2000) Supertraining. Supertraining Institute, Denver, pp 262–289

    Google Scholar 

  40. Steib S, Schoene D, Pfeifer K (2010) Dose-response relationship of resistance training in older adults: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:902–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tschopp M, Sattelmayer MK, Hilfiker R (2011) Is power training or conventional resistance training better for function in elderly persons? A meta-analysis. Age Ageing 40:549–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO (1982) Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 17:37–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data from this study were supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging R03-AG025141-01 and the Arthritis Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen P. Sayers.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Jean-René Lacour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sayers, S.P., Gibson, K. & Bryan Mann, J. Improvement in functional performance with high-speed power training in older adults is optimized in those with the highest training velocity. Eur J Appl Physiol 116, 2327–2336 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3484-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Average velocity
  • Power training
  • Aging
  • Functional performance