Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a field study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to describe the effects of speed and gradient during uphill ski mountaineering on energy expenditure, to relate any changes to changes in stride characteristics, and to determine an optimal gradient and speed allowing minimization of energy expenditure.

Methods

11 subjects were tested on snowy trails using their mountaineering skis (fitted with skins), boots and poles, at three gradients (7, 11 and 33 %) at 80 % of maximum heart rate (HRmax), and at 11 % also at 90 and 100 % of HRmax. Energy expenditure was calculated by indirect calorimetry to derive energy cost of locomotion (EC), vertical energy cost (ECvert) and mechanical efficiency, while stride length, stride frequency, relative and absolute thrust phase duration, and slope gradient were measured with an inertial sensor-based system.

Results

At 11 % there was no change with speed in EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency, while stride length and frequency increased and absolute thrust phase duration decreased. There was an effect of gradient on EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency, while speed, stride length and stride frequency decreased and absolute and relative thrust phase duration increased. The most economical gradient (lowest ECvert) was the steepest one.

Conclusion

During ski mountaineering uphill at shallow gradient (11 %), EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency do not vary with speed, while at steeper gradient (33 %) economy is improved. It follows that to minimize energy expenditure and optimize performance to reach a place located at a higher altitude, an athlete should choose a steep gradient, if he/she is able to maintain a sufficient speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

EC:

Energy cost of locomotion

ECvert :

Vertical energy cost

HRmax :

Maximum heart rate

HR:

Heart rate

mvert :

Vertical meter

\( \dot{\text V}\)O2 :

Oxygen uptake

\( \dot{\text V}\)O2max :

Maximal oxygen uptake

References

  • Adrian MJ, Singh M, Karpovich PV (1966) Energy cost of leg kick, arm stroke, and whole crawl stroke. J Appl Physiol 21:1763–1766

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ainegren M, Carlsson P, Laaksonen MS, Tinnsten M (2014) The influence of grip on oxygen consumption and leg forces when using classical style roller skis. Scand J Med Sci Sports 24:301–310. doi:10.1111/sms.12006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ardigò LP, Saibene F, Minetti AF (2003) The optimal locomotion on gradients: walking, running or cycling?. Europ J Appl Physiol 90(3–4):365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasel B, Favre J, Chardonnens J et al (2015) An inertial sensor-based system for spatio-temporal analysis in classic cross-country skiing diagonal technique. J Biomech 48:3199–3205. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fasel B, Praz C, Kayser B, Aminian K (2016) Measuring spatio-temporal parameters of uphill ski-mountaineering with ski-fixed inertial sensors. J Biomech. (online first) doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.017

  • Formenti F, Ardigo LP, Minetti AE (2005) Human locomotion on snow: determinants of economy and speed of skiing across the ages. Proc Biol Sci 272(1572):1561–1569. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura K, Tokuhiro A, Takechi H (1991) Gait analysis of slope walking: a study on step length, stride width, time factors and deviation in the center of pressure. Acta Med Okayama 45:179–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margaria R (1968) Positive and negative work performances and their efficiencies in human locomotion. Int Z Angew Physiol Einschl Arbeitsphysiol 25:339–351. doi:10.1007/BF00699624

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margaria R, Cerretelli P, Aghemo P, Sassi G (1963) Energy cost of running. J Appl Physiol 18:367–370

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millet GY, Hoffman MD, Candau RB et al (1998) Effect of rolling resistance on poling forces and metabolic demands of roller skiing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:755–762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minetti AE (1995) Optimum gradient of mountain paths. J Appl Physiol 79:1698–1703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minetti AE, Ardigo LP, Saibene F (1993) Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man. J Physiol 472:725–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Minetti AE, Ardigo LP, Saibene F (1994) Mechanical determinants of the minimum energy cost of gradient running in humans. J Exp Biol 195:211–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minetti AE, Moia C, Roi GS et al (2002) Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. J Appl Physiol 93:1039–1046. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01177.2001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J, Thorstensson A, Halbertsma J (1985) Changes in leg movements and muscle activity with speed of locomotion and mode of progression in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 123:457–475. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.1985.tb07612.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini B, Zoppirolli C, Bortolan L, Holmberg HC, Zamparo P, Schena F (2013) Biomechanical and energetic determinants of technique selection in classical cross-country skiing. Hum Mov Sci 32(6):1415–1429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Praz C, Fasel B, Vuistiner P et al (2016) Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a laboratory study. Eur J Appl Physiol 116:1011–1019. doi:10.1007/s00421-016-3371-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saibene F, Minetti AE (2003) Biomechanical and physiological aspects of legged locomotion in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 88(4):297–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tosi P, Leonardi A, Schena F (2009) The energy cost of ski mountaineering: effects of speed and ankle loading. J Sports Med Phys Fit 49:25–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tosi P, Leonardi A, Zerbini L et al (2010) Energy cost and efficiency of ski mountaineering. A laboratory study. J Sports Med Phys Fit 50:400–406

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Swiss Federal Office of Sports.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bengt Kayser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed with ethical approval from a competent body and complied to the international and national standards and legislation for experimental research with humans.

Additional information

Communicated by Jean-René Lacour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Praz, C., Fasel, B., Vuistiner, P. et al. Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a field study. Eur J Appl Physiol 116, 2017–2024 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3455-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3455-2

Keywords

Navigation