Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 116, Issue 3, pp 593–600 | Cite as

Strength and size relationships of the quadriceps and hamstrings with special reference to reciprocal muscle balance

  • Pavlos E. EvangelidisEmail author
  • Garry J. Massey
  • Matthew T. G. Pain
  • Jonathan P. Folland
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined the association of muscle size and strength for the quadriceps and hamstrings, the relationship between the size of these muscles, and whether the H:Q size ratio influenced reciprocal strength balance—widely regarded as a risk factor for hamstrings injury.

Methods

Knee extensor and flexor isometric, concentric and eccentric (50 and 350° s−1) strength were measured in 31 healthy, recreationally active young men. Muscle volume was measured with magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

The knee flexors achieved higher concentric and eccentric torques (normalised to isometric values) than the extensors. Muscle volume explained a significant part of the inter-individual differences in strength in both extensors (isometric 71 %, concentric 30–31 %) and flexors (isometric 38 %, concentric 50–55 %). Notably, muscle size was related to knee flexor eccentric strength (r = 0.69–0.76; R 2 = 48–58 %) but not extensor eccentric strength. Quadriceps and hamstrings volumes were moderately correlated (r = 0.64), with the majority of the variance in the size of one muscle (59 %) not explained by the size of the other muscle. The hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) volume ratio was correlated with the isometric (r = 0.45) and functional strength ratios (350° s−1, r = 0.56; 50° s−1, r = 0.34).

Conclusions

Muscle size exhibited a differential influence on knee extensor and flexor eccentric strength. Quadriceps and hamstrings muscle size was related, and the H:Q size ratio contributed to their strength ratios. Muscle size imbalances contribute to functional imbalances and these findings support the use of hamstrings strength training with an emphasis on hypertrophic adaptations for reducing injury risk.

Keywords

Maximal strength Muscle volume Hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio Torque-velocity relationship Isokinetic dynamometer Magnetic resonance imaging 

Abbreviations

ACSA

Anatomical cross-sectional area

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

CV

Coefficient of variation

H:Q

Hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

PCSA

Physiological cross-sectional area

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Magnusson SP, Larsson B, Dyhre-Poulsen P (1998) A new concept for isokinetic hamstring: quadriceps muscle strength ratio. Am J Sports Med 26:231–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Akagi R, Tohdoh Y, Takahashi H (2012) Muscle strength and size balances between reciprocal muscle groups in the thigh and lower leg for young men. Int J Sports Med 33:386–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Akagi R, Tohdoh Y, Takahashi H (2014) Strength and size ratios between reciprocal muscle groups in the thigh and lower leg of male collegiate soccer players. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 34:121–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Amiridis IG, Martin A, Morlon B, Martin L, Cometti G, Pousson M, van Hoecke J (1996) Co-activation and tension-regulating phenomena during isokinetic knee extension in sedentary and highly skilled humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 73:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babault N, Pousson M, Ballay Y, Van Hoecke J (2001) Activation of human quadriceps femoris during isometric, concentric, and eccentric contractions. J Appl Physiol 91:2628–2634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bamman MM, Newcomer BR, Larson-Meyer DE, Weinsier RL, Hunter GR (2000) Evaluation of the strength-size relationship in vivo using various muscle size indices. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1307–1313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Behm DG, Whittle J, Button D, Power K (2002) Intermuscle differences in activation. Muscle Nerve 25:236–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Byram IR, Bushnell BD, Dugger K, Charron K, Harrell FE Jr, Noonan TJ (2010) Preseason shoulder strength measurements in professional baseball pitchers: identifying players at risk for injury. Am J Sports Med 38:1375–1382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chumanov ES, Schache AG, Heiderscheit BC, Thelen DG (2012) Hamstrings are most susceptible to injury during the late swing phase of sprinting. Br J Sports Med 46:90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1381–1395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Croisier J, Forthomme B, Namurois M-H, Vanderthommen M, Criellaard J-M (2002) Hamstring muscle strain recurrence and strength performance disorders. Am J Sports Med 30:199–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Croisier JL, Ganteaume S, Binet J, Genty M, Ferret J-M (2008) Strength imbalances and prevention of hamstring injury in professional soccer players: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 36:1469–1475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Denadai BS, de Oliveira FB, Camarda SR, Ribeiro L, Greco CC (2014) Hamstrings-to-quadriceps strength and size ratios of male professional soccer players with muscle imbalance. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12209 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dudley GA, Harris RT, Duvoisin MR, Hather BM, Buchanan P (1990) Effect of voluntary vs. artificial activation on the relationship of muscle torque to speed. J Appl Physiol 69:2215–2221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dvir Z, Eger G, Halperin N, Shklar A (1989) Thigh muscle activity and anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Biomech 4:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fukunaga T, Miyatani M, Tachi M, Kouzaki M, Kawakami Y, Kanehisa H (2001) Muscle volume is a major determinant of joint torque in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 172:249–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kellis E, Baltzopoulos V (1998) Muscle activation differences between eccentric and concentric isokinetic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:1616–1623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Knapik JJ, Wright JE, Mawdsley RH, Braun J (1983) Isometric, isotonic, and isokinetic torque variations in four muscle groups through a range of joint motion. Phys Ther 63:938–947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lieber RL, Fridén J (2000) Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve 23:1647–1666CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pain MT, Young F, Kim J, Forrester SE (2013) The torque-velocity relationship in large human muscles: maximum voluntary versus electrically stimulated behaviour. J Biomech 46:645–650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwartz FP, Bottaro M, Celes RS, Brown LE, Nascimento FA (2010) The influence of velocity overshoot movement artifact on isokinetic knee extension tests. J Sports Sci Med 9:140–146PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Thelen DG, Chumanov ES, Hoerth DM, Best TM, Swanson SC, Li L, Young M, Heiderscheit BC (2005) Hamstring muscle kinematics during treadmill sprinting. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:108–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Westing SH, Cresswell AG, Thorstensson A (1991) Muscle activation during maximal voluntary eccentric and concentric knee extension. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 62:104–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Yeung SS, Suen AM, Yeung EW (2009) A prospective cohort study of hamstring injuries in competitive sprinters: preseason muscle imbalance as a possible risk factor. Br J Sports Med 43:589–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pavlos E. Evangelidis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Garry J. Massey
    • 1
  • Matthew T. G. Pain
    • 1
  • Jonathan P. Folland
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Sport, Exercise and Health SciencesLoughborough UniversityLeicestershireUK

Personalised recommendations