European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 116, Issue 3, pp 657–658 | Cite as

Motor unit recruitment cannot be inferred from surface EMG amplitude and basic reporting standards must be adhered to

  • Andrew D. Vigotsky
  • Dan Ogborn
  • Stuart M. Phillips
Letter to the Editor

Abstract

The study by Jenkins et al. attempted to elucidate the mechanisms behind the findings of Mitchell et al. (J Appl Physiol 113(1):71–77, 2012). However, we believe the work of Jenkins et al. contains methodological issues, does not meet electromyographic reporting standards, and deduces conclusions beyond which can be interpreted from the data provided.

Keywords

Electromyography Motor unit recruitment 

Abbreviations

EMG

Electromyography

iEMG

Integrated electromyography

MPF

Mean power frequency

MU

Motor unit

References

  1. Bouissou P, Estrade PY, Goubel F, Guezennec CY, Serrurier B (1989) Surface EMG power spectrum and intramuscular pH in human vastus lateralis muscle during dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol 67(3):1245–1249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jenkins ND, Housh TJ, Bergstrom HC, Cochrane KC, Hill EC, Smith CM, Johnson GO, Schmidt RJ, Cramer JT (2015) Muscle activation during three sets to failure at 80 vs. 30 % 1RM resistance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. doi:10.1007/s00421-015-3214-9 Google Scholar
  3. Mitchell CJ, Churchward-Venne TA, West DW, Burd NA, Breen L, Baker SK, Phillips SM (2012) Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. J Appl Physiol 113(1):71–77. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA
  2. 2.McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations