Skip to main content
Log in

Gender differences in power production, energetic capacity and efficiency of elite cross-country skiers during whole-body, upper-body, and arm poling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize gender differences in power output, energetic capacity and exercise efficiency during whole-body (WP), upper-body (UP), and arm poling (AP).

Methods

Ten male and ten female elite cross-country skiers, matched for international performance level, completed three incremental submaximal tests and a 3-min self-paced performance test on a Concept2 SkiErg. Power output, cardiorespiratory and kinematic variables were monitored. Body composition was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Results

The men demonstrated 87, 97 and 103 % higher power output, and 51, 65 and 71 % higher VO2peak (L min−1) than the women during WP, UP and AP, respectively, while utilizing ~10 % more of their running VO2max in all modes (all P < 0.001). The men had 35, 38 and 59 % more lean mass in the whole body, upper body and arms (all P < 0.001). The men exhibited greater shoulder and elbow extension at the start of poling and greater trunk flexion at the end of poling (all P < 0.05). The relationship between VO2 and power output did not differ between the men and women.

Conclusions

Gender differences in power production and peak aerobic capacity increased sequentially from WP to UP to AP, coinciding with a greater portion of the muscle mass in the arms of the men. Although the men and women employed each poling technique differently, the estimated efficiency of double poling was independent of gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

AP:

Arm poling

cm:

Centimeter

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

DXA:

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

FIS:

International Ski Federation

h:

Hours

HRmax :

Maximal heart rate

J:

Joule

kg:

Kilogram

L:

Liter

min:

Minute

mmol:

Millimole

O2 :

Oxygen

RPE:

Rating of perceived exertion

UP:

Upper-body poling

VO2 :

Oxygen uptake

VO2max :

Maximal oxygen uptake

W:

Watts

WP:

Whole-body poling

yrs:

Years

µL:

Microliter

References

  • Ainegren M, Carlsson P, Tinnsten M, Laaksonen MS (2013) Skiing economy and efficiency in recreational and elite cross-country skiers. J Strength Cond Res Natl Strength Cond Assoc 27(5):1239–1252. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824f206c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bojsen-Moller J, Losnegard T, Kemppainen J, Viljanen T, Kalliokoski KK, Hallen J (2010) Muscle use during double poling evaluated by positron emission tomography. J Appl Physiol 109(6):1895–1903. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00671.2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borg G (1970) Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 2(2):92–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calbet JA, Holmberg HC, Rosdahl H, van Hall G, Jensen-Urstad M, Saltin B (2005) Why do arms extract less oxygen than legs during exercise? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 289(5):R1448–R1458. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00824.2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coast JR, Blevins JS, Wilson BA (2004) Do gender differences in running performance disappear with distance? Can J Appl Physiol 29(2):139–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder MJ, Hand DJ (1990) Analysis of repeated measures. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater BL (1984) Women and exercise: physiological aspects. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 12:21–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ettema G, Loras HW (2009) Efficiency in cycling: a review. Eur J Appl Physiol 106(1):1–14. doi:10.1007/s00421-009-1008-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falkel JE, Sawka MN, Levine L, Pimental NA, Pandolf KB (1986) Upper-body exercise performance: comparison between women and men. Ergonomics 29(1):145–154. doi:10.1080/00140138608968247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes SC, Chilibeck PD, Craven B, Bhambhani Y (2010) Comparison of a double poling ergometer and field test for elite cross country sit skiers. N Am J Sports Phys Therapy (NAJSPT) 5(2):40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda DH, Hetrick RP, Kendall KL, Smith-Ryan AE, Jackson ME, Stout JR (2014) Characterization of the work-time relationship during cross-country ski ergometry. Physiol Meas 35(1):31–43. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/35/1/31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hegge AM, Bolger CM, Sandbakk Ø (2015a) The blood lactate and cardiorespiratory responses to upper and lower body exercise in cross-country skiers. In: Müller E, Kröll J, Lindinger S, Pfusterschmied J, Stöggl T (eds) Science and skiing VI. Meyer & Meyer Sport (UK), Oxford, pp 396–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegge AM, Myhre K, Welde B, Holmberg HC, Sandbakk O (2015b) Are gender differences in upper-body power generated by elite cross-country skiers augmented by increasing the intensity of exercise? PLoS One 10(5):e0127509. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127509

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heyward VH, Johannes-Ellis SM, Romer JF (1986) Gender differences in strength. Res Q Exerc Sport 57(2):154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill DW, Smith JC (1993) Gender difference in anaerobic capacity: role of aerobic contribution. Br J Sports Med 27(1):45–48

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg HC, Lindinger S, Stoggl T, Bjorklund G, Muller E (2006) Contribution of the legs to double-poling performance in elite cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38(10):1853–1860. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000230121.83641.d1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingjer F (1991) Maximal oxygen uptake as a predictor of performance ability in woman and man elite cross-country skiers. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1(1):25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM, Ross R (2000) Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J Appl Physiol 89(1):81–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner MJ (1993) Physiological limiting factors and distance running: influence of gender and age on record performances. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 21:103–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lepers R, Stapley PJ (2010) Differences in gender and performance in off-road triathlon. J Sports Sci 28(14):1555–1562. doi:10.1080/02640414.2010.517545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis DA, Kamon E, Hodgson JL (1986) Physiological differences between genders. Implications for sports conditioning. Sports Med 3(5):357–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindinger SJ, Stöggl T, Müller E, Holmberg HC (2009) Control of speed during the double poling technique performed by elite cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(1):210–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maud PJ, Shultz BB (1986) Gender comparisons in anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity tests. Br J Sports Med 20(2):51–54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AE, MacDougall JD, Tarnopolsky MA, Sale DG (1993) Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 66(3):254–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rud B, Secher NH, Nilsson J, Smith G, Hallen J (2014) Metabolic and mechanical involvement of arms and legs in simulated double pole skiing. Scand J Med Sci Sports 24(6):913–919. doi:10.1111/sms.12133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandbakk O, Holmberg HC, Leirdal S, Ettema G (2010) Metabolic rate and gross efficiency at high work rates in world class and national level sprint skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol 109(3):473–481. doi:10.1007/s00421-010-1372-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandbakk O, Ettema G, Leirdal S, Holmberg HC (2012) Gender differences in the physiological responses and kinematic behaviour of elite sprint cross-country skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol 112(3):1087–1094. doi:10.1007/s00421-011-2063-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sandbakk O, Hegge AM, Ettema G (2013) The role of incline, performance level, and gender on the gross mechanical efficiency of roller ski skating. Front Physiol 4:293. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00293

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sandbakk O, Ettema G, Holmberg HC (2014) Gender differences in endurance performance by elite cross-country skiers are influenced by the contribution from poling. Scand J Med Sci Sports 24(1):28–33. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01482.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher YO, Mueller P, Keul J (2001) Development of peak performance in track cycling. J Sports Med Phys Fit 41(2):139–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seiler KS, Kjerland GO (2006) Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports 16(1):49–56. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00418.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seiler S, De Koning JJ, Foster C (2007) The fall and rise of the gender difference in elite anaerobic performance 1952–2006. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39(3):534–540. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000247005.17342.2b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sparling PB (1980) A meta-analysis of studies comparing maximal oxygen uptake in men and women. Res Q Exerc Sport 51(3):542–552. doi:10.1080/02701367.1980.10608077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stefani RT (2006) The relative power output and relative lean body mass of World and Olympic male and female champions with implications for gender equity. J Sports Sci 24(12):1329–1339. doi:10.1080/02640410500520559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoggl T, Enqvist J, Muller E, Holmberg HC (2010) Relationships between body composition, body dimensions, and peak speed in cross-country sprint skiing. J Sports Sci 28(2):161–169. doi:10.1080/02640410903414160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Hall G, Jensen-Urstad M, Rosdahl H, Holmberg HC, Saltin B, Calbet JA (2003) Leg and arm lactate and substrate kinetics during exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284(1):193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verellen J, Meyer C, Janssens L, Vanlandewijck Y (2012) Peak and submaximal steady-state metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses during arm-powered and arm-trunk-powered handbike ergometry in able-bodied participants. Eur J Appl Physiol 112(3):983–989. doi:10.1007/s00421-011-2051-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woo JS, Derleth C, Stratton JR, Levy WC (2006) The influence of age, gender, and training on exercise efficiency. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(5):1049–1057. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda N, Gaskill SE, Ruby BC (2008) No gender-specific differences in mechanical efficiency during arm or leg exercise relative to ventilatory threshold. Scand J Med Sci Sports 18(2):205–212. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00637.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the skiers and coaches for their cooperation and participation, Kenneth Myhre for assistance in the laboratory, and Jørgen Danielsen for assistance in analyzing kinematic data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Magdalen Hegge.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Peter Krustrup.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hegge, A.M., Bucher, E., Ettema, G. et al. Gender differences in power production, energetic capacity and efficiency of elite cross-country skiers during whole-body, upper-body, and arm poling. Eur J Appl Physiol 116, 291–300 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-015-3281-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-015-3281-y

Keywords

Navigation