Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 115, Issue 5, pp 969–979 | Cite as

Energetics and biomechanics of double poling in regional and high-level cross-country skiers

  • Chiara ZoppirolliEmail author
  • Barbara Pellegrini
  • Lorenzo Bortolan
  • Federico Schena
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the energetics and the biomechanics of double poling technique (DP) in two groups of cross-country skiers.

Methods

Eight high-level (HLG) and eight regional-level (RLG) skiers performed a 5-min sub-maximal DP trial, roller skiing on a treadmill at 14 km h−1 and 2°. Energetic cost (ECDP), center of mass (COM) vertical displacement range, body inclination (θ, i.e., the angle between the vertical line and the line passing through COM and a fixed pivot point identified at feet level) and mechanical work associated to COM motion were analyzed. Pole and joint kinematics, poling forces and cycle timing were also considered.

Results

HLG showed lower ECDP than RLG, smaller COM vertical displacement range and mechanical work, whereas higher θ during the early part of the poling phase (P < 0.05). In HLG, pole inclination was higher, poling forces greater and cycle duration longer (P < 0.05). Considering all skiers, a forward multiple regression revealed that the maximum value of θ (θ max) and the minimum value of COM vertical displacement resulted the COM-related parameters that better predict ECDP (AdjR 2 = 0.734; P < 0.001). Moreover, θ max positively related to poling force integrals and cycle duration (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

A pronounced body inclination during the early poling phase and a reduced COM vertical displacement range concur in explaining the differences in ECDP found between the groups and among the skiers. A mechanically advantageous motion of COM during DP improves poling effectiveness, reduces cycle frequency and the mechanical work sustained.

Keywords

Cross-country skiing COM Energetic cost Poling force 

Abbreviations

[BLa]

Blood lactate concentration

2-D

Bi-dimensional

COM

Center of mass

DP

Double poling

EC

Energetic cost

ECDP

Energetic cost of double poling

FISI

Federazione Italiana Sport Invernali (Italian Winter Sports Federation)

HLG

High-level group

iF %

Integral of poling force normalized by body weight

iFx%

Integral of propulsive poling force normalized by body weight

iFz%

Integral of vertical poling force normalized by body weight

m

Body segment mass

M

Body mass

MANOVA

Multivariate analysis of variance

MATLAB

Matrix laboratory

Max

Maximum value within a cycle

Min

Minimum value within a cycle

Off

End of poling phase

On

Start of poling phase

P

P value

pk

Instant of peak poling force

R

R value

RLG

Regional-level group

SD

Standard deviation

SPSS

Statistical package for the social sciences

V′O2

Oxygen consumption

Wx

Mechanical work associated with forward movement of COM

Wz

Mechanical work associated with vertical movement of COM

WCOM

Mechanical work associated with total movement of COM

x

Antero-posterior dimension

xCOM

Position of center of mass in the antero-posterior dimension

z

Vertical dimension

zCOM

Position of center of mass in the vertical dimension

α

Pole inclination

θ

Body inclination with respect to the vertical line

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the athletes and their coaches for their participation and cooperation, the military groups to which the skiers belong (Fiamme Gialle and Fiammo Oro) and the Italian Federation of Winter Sports Federation (FISI). This study was supported financially by the Municipality of Rovereto, Italy.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ainegren M, Carlsson P, Tinnsten M, Laaksonen MS (2013) Skiing economy and efficiency in recreational and elite cross-country skiers. J Strength Cond Res 27(5):1239–1252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbosa TM, Keskinen KL, Fernandes RJ, Colaco P, Lima AB, Vilas-Boas JP (2005) Energy cost and intracyclic variation of the velocity of the centre of mass in butterfly stroke. Eur J Appl Physiol 93(5):519–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbosa TM, Fernandes RJ, Keskinen KL, Vilas-Boas JP (2008) The influence of stroke mechanics into energy cost of elite swimmers. Eur J Appl Physiol 103(2):139–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Belli A, Lacour JR, Komi PV, Candau R, Denis C (1995) Mechanical step variability during treadmill running. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 70(6):510–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilodeau B, Rundell KW, Roy B, Boulay MR (1996) Kinematics of cross-country ski racing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28(1):128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Candau R, Belli A, Millet GY, Georges D, Barbier B, Rouillon JD (1998) Energy cost and running mechanics during a treadmill run to voluntary exhaustion in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 77(6):479–485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Capelli C, Zamparo P, Cigalotto A, Francescato MP, Soule RG, Termin B, Pendergast DR, Di Prampero PE (1995) Bioenergetics and biomechanics of front crawl swimming. J Appl Physiol 78(2):674–679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dempster WT, Gabel WC, Felts WJ (1959) The anthropometry of the manual work space for the seated subject. Am J Phys Anthropol 17:289–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. di Prampero PE (2003) Factors limiting maximal performance in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 90(3–4):420–429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. di Prampero PE, Ferretti G (1999) The energetics of anaerobic muscle metabolism: a reappraisal of older and recent concepts. Respir Physiol 118(2–3):103–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandes R, Billat V, Cruz A, Colaco P, Cardoso C, Campos J (2006) Does net energy cost of swimming affect time to exhaustion at the individual’s maximal oxygen consumption velocity? J Sports Med Phys Fitness 46(3):373–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gard SA, Miff SC, Kuo AD (2004) Comparison of kinematic and kinetic methods for computing the vertical motion of the body center of mass during walking. Hum Mov Sci 22(6):597–610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gregor RJ, Kirkendall D (1978) Performance efficiency of world class female marathon runners. In: Ansmussen E, Jorgensen K (eds) Biomechanics VI-B. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 40–45Google Scholar
  14. Gutierrez-Farewik EM, Bartonek Ǻ, Saraste H (2006) Comparison and evaluation of two common methods to measure center of mass displacement in three dimensions during gait. Hum Mov Sci 25(2):238–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffman MD, Clifford PS (1990) Physiological responses to different cross country skiing techniques on level terrain. Med Sci Sports Exerc 22(6):841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Holmberg HC, Lindinger S, Stöggl T, Eitzlmair E, Müller E (2005) Biomechanical analysis of double poling in elite cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(5):807–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Holmberg HC, Lindinger S, Stöggl T, Björklund G, Müller E (2006) Contribution of the legs to double-poling performance in elite cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38(10):1853–1860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Joyner MJ, Coyle EF (2008) Endurance exercise performance: the physiology of champions. J Physiol 586(1):35–44CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Leirdal S, Saetran L, Roeleveld K, Vereijken B, Bråten S, Løset S, Holtermann A, Ettema G (2006) Effects of body position on slide boarding performance by cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38(8):1462–1469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindinger SJ, Holmberg H-C (2011) How do elite cross-country skiers adapt to different double poling frequencies at low to high speeds? Eur J Appl Physiol 111(6):1103–1119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindinger SJ, Holmberg HC, Müller E, Rapp W (2009) Changes in upper body muscle activity with increasing double poling velocities in elite cross-country skiing. Eur J Appl Physiol 106(3):353–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Millet GY, Hoffman MD, Candau RB, Buckwalter JB, Clifford PS (1998) Cycle rate variations in roller ski skating: effects on oxygen uptake and poling forces. Int J Sports Med 19(08):521–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Millet GY, Perrey S, Candau R, Rouillon JD (2002) Relationships between aerobic energy cost, performance and kinematic parameters in roller ski skating. Int J Sports Med 23(3):191–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nilsson J, Tinmark F, Halvorsen K, Arndt A (2013) Kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic adaptation to speed and resistance in double poling cross country skiing. Eur J Appl Physiol 113(6):1385–1394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pellegrini B (2011) Biomechanical and physiological characterization of cross-country skiing techniques. Analysis of the selection between techniques. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  26. Pellegrini B, Bortolan L, Schena F (2011) Poling force analysis in diagonal stride at different grades in cross country skiers. Scand J Med Sci Sports 21(4):589–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pellegrini B, Zoppirolli C, Bortolan L, Holmberg H-C, Zamparo P, Schena F (2013) Biomechanical and energetic determinants of technique selection in classical cross-country skiing. Hum Mov Sci 32(6):1415–1429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Peronnet F, Massicotte D (1991) Table of nonprotein respiratory quotient: an update. Can J Sport Sci 16:23–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rundell KW, McCarthy JR (1996) Effect of kinematic variables on performance in women during a cross-country ski race. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28(11):1413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Saibene F, Cortili G, Roi G, Colombini A (1989) The energy cost of level cross-country skiing and the effect of the friction of the ski. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 58(7):791–795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Saltin B (1997) The physiology of competitive cc skiing across a four decade perspective; with a note on training induced adaptations and role of training at medium altitude. Science and skiing. Chapman & Hall, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Sandbakk Ø, Holmberg HC, Leirdal S, Ettema G (2010) Metabolic rate and gross efficiency at high work rates in world class and national level sprint skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol 109(3):473–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sandbakk Ø, Ettema G, Leirdal S, Jakobsen V, Holmberg HC (2011) Analysis of a sprint ski race and associated laboratory determinants of world-class performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 111(6):947–957CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, Hawley JA (2004) Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Med 34(7):465–485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Seifert L, Toussaint HM, Alberty M, Schnitzler C, Chollet D (2010) Arm coordination, power, and swim efficiency in national and regional front crawl swimmers. Hum Mov Sci 29(3):426–439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith GA, Fewster JB, Braudt SM (1996) Double poling kinematics and performance in cross-country skiing. J Appl Biomech 12:88–103Google Scholar
  37. Stöggl T, Holmberg HC (2011) Force interaction and 3D pole movement in double poling. Scand J Med Sci Sports 21(6):e393–e404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Stöggl TL, Müller E (2009) Kinematic determinants and physiological response of cross-country skiing at maximal speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(7):1476–1487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Willems PA, Cavagna GA, Heglund NC (1995) External, internal and total work in human locomotion. J Exp Biol 198(2):379–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams KR, Cavanagh PR (1987) Relationship between distance running mechanics, running economy and performace. J Appl Physiol 63(3):1236–1245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zoppirolli C, Holmberg H-C, Pellegrini B, Quaglia D, Bortolan L, Schena F (2013) The effectiveness of stretch-shortening cycling in upper-limb extensor muscles during elite cross-country skiing with the double-poling technique. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.08.013 PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Zoppirolli
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Barbara Pellegrini
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lorenzo Bortolan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Federico Schena
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.CeRiSM (Research Center Sport Mountain and Health)RoveretoItaly
  2. 2.Neurological and Movement Science DepartmentUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations