Skip to main content

Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill

Abstract

Purpose

Minimalist running shoes are designed to induce a foot strike made more with the forepart of the foot. The main changes made on minimalist shoe consist in decreasing the height difference between fore and rear parts of the sole (drop). Barefoot and shod running have been widely compared on overground or treadmill these last years, but the key characteristic effects of minimalist shoes have been yet little studied. The purpose of this study is to find whether the shoe drop has the same effect regardless of the task: overground or treadmill running.

Methods

Twelve healthy male subjects ran with three shoes of different drops (0, 4, 8 mm) and barefoot on a treadmill and overground. Vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) (transient peak and loading rate) and lower limb kinematics (foot, ankle and knee joint flexion angles) were observed.

Results

Opposite footwear effects on loading rate between the tasks were observed. Barefoot running induced higher loading rates during overground running than the highest drop condition, while it was the opposite during treadmill running. Ankle plantar flexion and knee flexion angles at touchdown were higher during treadmill than overground running for all conditions, except for barefoot which did not show any difference between the tasks.

Conclusions

Shoe drop appears to be a key parameter influencing running pattern, but its effects on vGRF differ depending on the task (treadmill vs. overground running) and must be considered with caution. Unlike shod conditions, kinematics of barefoot condition was not altered by treadmill running explaining opposite conclusions between the tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

BF:

Barefoot condition

BW:

Body weight

D0:

0 mm shoe drop condition

D4:

4 mm shoe drop condition

D8:

8 mm shoe drop condition

EU:

European Union

EVA:

Ethylene-vinyl acetate

GRF:

Ground reaction force

vGRF:

Vertical ground reaction force

References

  • Altman AR, Davis IS (2012) A kinematic method for footstrike pattern detection in barefoot and shod runners. Gait Posture 35(2):298–300

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson FC, Pandy MG (1999) A dynamic optimization solution for vertical jumping in three dimensions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2(3):201–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop M, Fiolkowski P, Conrad B, Brunt D, Horodyski MB (2006) Athletic footwear, leg stiffness, and running kinematics. J Athl Train 41(4):387–392

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh PR, Lafortune MA (1980) Ground reaction forces in distance running. J Biomech 13(5):397–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chambon N, Delattre N, Guéguen N, Berton E, Rao G (2014) Is midsole thickness a key parameter for the running pattern? Gait Posture 40(1):58–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung RT, Rainbow MJ (2014) Landing pattern and vertical loading rates during first attempt of barefoot running in habitual shod runners. Hum Mov Sci 34(120):127

    Google Scholar 

  • Daoud AI, Geissler GJ, Wang F, Saretsky J, Daoud YA, Lieberman DE (2012) Foot strike and injury rates in endurance runners: a retrospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44(7):1325–1334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit B, De Clercq D, Aerts P (2000) Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running. J Biomech 33(269):278

    Google Scholar 

  • Delattre N, Chambon N, Berton E, Gueguen N, Rao G (2013) Effect of time during a running session with minimal footwear. Footwear Sci 5(Suppl 1):S113–S114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, Guendelman E, Thelen DG (2007) OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54(11):1940–1950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dingwell JB, Cusumano JP, Cavanagh PR, Sternad D (2001) Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking. J Biomech Eng 123(1):27–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Divert C, Mornieux G, Baur F, Mayer F, Belli A (2005) Mechanical comparison of barefoot and shod running. Int J Sports Med 26(7):593–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Divert C, Mornieux G, Freychat P, Baly L, Mayer F, Belli A (2008) Barefoot-shod running differences: shoe or mass effect? Int J Sports Med 29(6):512–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duquette AM, Andrews DM (2010) Comparing methods of quantifying tibial acceleration slope. J Appl Biomech 26(2):229–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fellin RE, Manal K, Davis IS (2010) Comparison of lower extremity kinematic curves during overground and treadmill running. J Appl Biomech 26(4):407–414

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukano M, Nagano Y, Ida H, Fukubayashi T (2009) Change in tibial rotation of barefoot versus shod running. Footwear Sci 1(1):19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen KG, van den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM (1995) Direct dynamics simulation of the impact phase in heel-toe running. J Biomech 28(6):661–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamill J, Russel EM, Gruber AH, Miller R (2011) Impact characteristics in shod and barefoot running. Footwear Sci 3(1):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamner SR, Seth A, Delp SL (2010) Muscle contributions to propulsion and support during running. J Biomech 43(14):2709–2716

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander K, Riebe D, Campe S, Braumann KM, Zech A (2014) Effects of footwear on treadmill running biomechanics in preadolescent children. Gait Posture 40(3):381–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horvais N, Samozino P (2013) Effect of midsole geometry on foot-stike pattern and running kinematics. Footwear Sci 5(2):81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hreljac A, Marshall RN, Hume PA (2000) Evaluation of lower extremity overuse injury potential in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(9):1635–1641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME (1990) Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res 8(3):383–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, Daoud AI, D’Andrea S, Davis IS, Ojiambo Mang’Eni R, Pitsiladis Y (2010) Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature 463(7280):531–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lussiana T, Hébert-Losier H, Mourot L (2014) Effect of minimal shoes and slope on vertical and leg stiffness during running. J Sport Health Sci. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2013.09.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner CE, Ferber R, Pollard CD, Hamill J, Davis IS (2006) Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38(2):323–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nigg BM, De Boer RW, Fisher V (1995) A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27(1):98–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paquette MR, Zhang S, Baumgartner DL (2013) Acute effects of barefoot, minimal shoes and running shoes on lower limb mechanics in rear and forefoot strike runners. Footwear Sci 5(1):9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl MB, Hamill J, Davis IS (2009) Biomechanical and anatomic factors associated with a history of plantar fasciitis in female runners. Clin J Sport Med 19(5):372–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shih Y, Lin KL, Shiang TY (2013) Is the foot striking pattern more important than barefoot or shod conditions in running? Gait Posture 38(3):490–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Squadrone R, Galozzi C (2009) Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners. J Sports Med Phys Fit 49(1):6–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Squadrone R, Galozzi C (2011) Effect of a five-toed minimal protection shoe on static and dynamic ankle position sense. J Sports Med Phys Fit 51(3):401–408

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • TenBroek TM, Rodrigues P, Frederick EC, Hamill J (2013) Effects of unknown footwear midsole thickness on running kinematics within the initial six minutes of running. Footwear Sci 5(1):27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willy RW, Davis IS (2014) Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46(2):318–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors disclose that there is no conflict of interest regarding this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Chambon.

Additional information

Communicated by Jean-René Lacour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chambon, N., Delattre, N., Guéguen, N. et al. Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill. Eur J Appl Physiol 115, 911–918 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-3072-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-3072-x

Keywords

  • Footwear
  • Barefoot
  • Foot strike
  • Ground reaction force
  • Kinematics