Muscle activation during low- versus high-load resistance training in well-trained men
- 1.6k Downloads
It has been hypothesized that lifting light loads to muscular failure will activate the full spectrum of MUs and thus bring about muscular adaptations similar to high-load training. The purpose of this study was to investigate EMG activity during low- versus high-load training during performance of a multi-joint exercise by well-trained subjects.
Employing a within-subject design, 10 young, resistance-trained men performed sets of the leg press at different intensities of load: a high-load (HL) set at 75 % of 1-RM and a low-load (LL) set at 30 % of 1-RM. The order of performance of the exercises was counterbalanced between participants, so that half of the subjects performed LL first and the other half performed HL first, separated by 15 min rest. Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to assess mean and peak muscle activation of the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, and biceps femoris.
Significant main effects for trials and muscles were found (p < 0.01). Significantly greater peak EMG activity was found during the HL set (M = 177.3, SD = 89.53) compared to the LL set (M = 137.73, SD = 95.35). Significantly greater mean EMG activity was found during the HL set (M = 63.7, SD = 37.23) compared to the LL set (M = 41.63, SD = 28.03).
Results indicate that training with a load of 30 % 1-RM to momentary muscular failure does not maximally activate the full motor unit pool of the quadriceps femoris and hamstrings during performance of multi-joint lower body exercise.
KeywordsMuscle recruitment Low-load resistance training Light weights Momentary muscular failure
Muscle protein synthesis
Maximal voluntary isometric contraction
We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Robert Harris and Gabriel Irizarry for their indispensible roles as research assistants in this study.
- Baechle TR, Earle RW (eds) (2008) Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- Hislop H, Montgomery J (2002) Daniels and Wortingham’s muscle testing: techniques of manual examination. WB Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- SENIAM Project (2005) Recommendations for sensor locations on individual muscles. http://seniam.org/sensor_location.htm
- Wright GA, Delong T, Gehlsen G (1999) Electromyographic activity of the hamstrings during performance of the leg curl, stiff-leg deadlift and back squat movements. J Strength Cond Res 13:168–174Google Scholar