Oxygen breathing or recompression during decompression from nitrox dives with a rebreather: effects on intravascular bubble burden and ramifications for decompression profiles
- 244 Downloads
Preventive measures to reduce the risk of decompression sickness can involve several procedures such as oxygen breathing during in-water decompression. Theoretical predictions also suggest that brief periods of recompression during the course of decompression could be a method for controlling bubble formation. The aim of this study was to get clearer information about the effects of different experimental ascent profiles (EAPs) on bubble reduction, using pure oxygen or recompression during decompression for nitrox diving. Four EAPs were evaluated using bubble monitoring in a group of six military divers using Nitrox 40% O2 breathing with a rebreather. For EAP 1 and 2, 100% O2 was used for the end stage of decompression, with a 30% reduction of decompression time in EAP 1 and 50% in EAP 2, compared to the French navy standard schedule. For EAP 3 and 4, nitrox 40% O2 was maintained throughout the decompression stage. EAP 3 is based on an air standard decompression schedule, whereas EAP 4 involved a brief period of recompression at the end of the stop. We found that EAP 1 significantly reduced bubble formation, whereas high bubble grades occurred with other EAPs. No statistical differences were observed in bubbles scores between EAP 3 and 4. One diver developed mild neurological symptoms after EAP 3. These results tend to demonstrate that the “oxygen window” plays a key role in the reduction of bubble production and that breathing pure oxygen during decompression stops is an optimal strategy to prevent decompression sickness for nitrox diving.
KeywordsDiving Decompression sickness Bubble Oxygen Recompression
The authors would like to thank the participating divers for their patience; the hyperbaric nurses who helping with the experiments (Denis Maisterrena and Yoann Mykijewicz) and the team of the hyperbaric centre CEPHISMER for their excellent technical assistance during the course of the study.
Conflict of interest
There is no financial or other relationship that might be perceived as leading to a conflict of interest (i.e., affecting author’s objectivity).
- Behnke AR (1951) Decompression sickness following exposure to high pressures. In: Fulton JF (ed) Decompression sickness. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 53–89Google Scholar
- Bert P (1878) The barometric pressure. Researches in experimental physiology. Translated by Hitchcock MA, Hitchcock FA, Columbus OH, College Book Company, 1943Google Scholar
- Blatteau JE, Gempp E, Simon O, Coulange M, Delafosse B, Souday V, Cochard G, Arvieux J, Henckes A, Lafère P, Germonpré P, Constantin P, Hugon M, Barthélémy A (2010) Prognostic factors of spinal cord decompression sickness in recreational diving: retrospective and multicentric analysis of 279 cases. Neurocrit Care (in press)Google Scholar
- Direction des Journaux Officiels (1992) Travaux en milieu hyperbare. Mesures particulières de prévention. No. 1636. ParisGoogle Scholar
- Gempp E, Louge P, Blatteau JE, Hugon M (2011) Descriptive epidemiology of 153 diving injuries with rebreathers among french military divers from 1979 to 2009. Mil Med 176 (3:1), in pressGoogle Scholar
- Gernhardt ML (1991) Development and evaluation of a decompression stress index based on tissue bubble dynamics. Ph Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp 284–290Google Scholar
- Hamilton RW, Thalmann E (2003) Decompression practice. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS (eds) Bennett and Elliot’s physiology and medicine of diving, 5th edn. WB Saunders, London, pp 453–498Google Scholar
- Hills BA (1966) A thermodynamic and kinetic approach to decompression sickness. Thesis, Adelaïde, Libraries Board of South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Hills BA (1977) Decompression sickness, volume 1: the biophysical basis of prevention and treatment. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hugon J (2010) Vers une modélisation biophysique de la décompression. PhD dissertation. Université de la Méditerranée, FranceGoogle Scholar
- Imbert JP, Bontoux M (1987) Production of procedures: comex. In: Nashimoto I, Lanphier EH (eds) Decompression in surface-based diving. 73(DES)6/15/87. Undersea Hyperbaric Medical Society, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
- Nishi RY, Eatock BC, Lauckner GR (1984) Evaluation of compressed air dives with oxygen decompression using Doppler ultrasonic monitoring. In: Abstract of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc. Annual Scientific Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, May 29–June 2, 1984Google Scholar
- Nishi RY, Brubakk AO, Eftedal OS (2003) Bubble detection. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS (eds) Bennett and Elliot’s physiology and medicine of diving, 5th edn edn. WB Saunders, London, pp 501–529Google Scholar
- Srinivisan RS, Gerth WA, Powell MR (1999) Mathematical models of diffusion-limited gas bubble dynamics in tissue. J Appl Physiol 86(2):732–741Google Scholar
- Walker JR, Hobbs GW, Gault KA, Howle LE, Freiberger JJ (2010) Decompression risk analysis comparing oxygen and 50% nitrox decompression stops. In: Abstract of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc. Annual Scientific Meeting, St Pete Beach Florida, June 3–5 2010Google Scholar