Skip to main content
Log in

Variability in physical activity patterns as measured by the SenseWear Armband: how many days are needed?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To examine sources of variance in objectively measured physical activity and to determine the number of monitoring days needed to quantify physical activity patterns reliably, 394 Flemish adults (41.1 ± 9.9 years) were monitored during 7 days, using the SenseWear Armband. Differences between weekdays, Saturday and Sunday were examined with repeated measures ANOVA’s. Variance components were estimated for subject, weekday and residual error using data from Mondays through Fridays and used to calculate the reliability of 1–5 monitoring weekdays. Saturday was more and Sunday less active than an average weekday. Inter-individual variability was the largest source of variance (54.4–67.9%) for physical activity level (PAL), energy expenditure, inactivity, light, moderate and total physical activity. Intra-individual variability accounted for 31.8–44.8% and weekday for 0.1–1.1% of total variance. Intra-individual variability was the largest source of variance for vigorous activity in both sexes and steps in women. At least, 3 monitoring weekdays were required to achieve a reliability of 0.80 for PAL, energy expenditure, inactivity, light, moderate and total physical activity. All 5 weekdays should be monitored to reach acceptable reliability for steps. Five weekdays resulted in a reliability of 0.58–0.60 for vigorous activity. Both Saturday and Sunday and at least 3 weekdays need to be monitored to obtain reliable measures of habitual physical activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’Brien WL, Bassett DR Jr, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, Jacobs DR Jr, Leon AS (2000) Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S498–S504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baranowski T, de Moor C (2000) How many days was that? Intra-individual variability and physical activity assessment. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:S74–S78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baranowski T, Smith M, Thompson WO, Baranowski J, Hebert D, de Moor C (1999) Intraindividual variability and reliability in a 7-day exercise record. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:1619–1622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baranowski T, Masse LC, Ragan B, Welk G (2008) How many days was that? We’re still not sure, but we’re asking the question better!. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:S544–S549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett DR Jr (2000) Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:S30–S36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchowski MS, Acra S, Majchrzak KM, Sun M, Chen KY (2004) Patterns of physical activity in free-living adults in the Southern United States. Eur J Clin Nutr 58:828–837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Catellier DJ, Hannan PJ, Murray DM, Addy CL, Conway TL, Yang S, Rice JC (2005) Imputation of missing data when measuring physical activity by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:S555–S562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen KY, Bassett DR Jr (2005) The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:S490–S500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman KJ, Epstein LH (1998) Application of generalizability theory to measurement of activity in males who are not regularly active: a preliminary report. Res Q Exerc Sport 69:58–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corder K, Brage S, Ekelund U (2007) Accelerometers and pedometers: methodology and clinical application. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 10:597–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donahoo WT, Levine JA, Melanson EL (2004) Variability in energy expenditure and its components. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 7:599–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunton GF, Whalen CK, Jamner LD, Henker B, Floro JN (2005) Using ecologic momentary assessment to measure physical activity during adolescence. Am J Prev Med 29:281–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gretebeck RJ, Montoye HJ (1992) Variability of some objective measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24:1167–1172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagstromer M, Oja P, Sjostrom M (2007) Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:1502–1508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A (2007) Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:1423–1434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jakicic JM, Marcus M, Gallagher KI, Randall C, Thomas E, Goss FL, Robertson RJ (2004) Evaluation of the SenseWear Pro Armband to assess energy expenditure during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:897–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johannsen DL, Calabro MA, Stewart J, Franke W, Rood JC, Welk GJ (2010) Accuracy of armband monitors for measuring daily energy expenditure in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:2134–2140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson M, Baranowski T (1996) Estimating and evaluating correlation structures in repeated measures designs using the GLM and MIXED procedures. In: SAS Users Group International Proceedings (SUGI 21)

  • Kang M, Bassett DR, Barreira TV, Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth B, Reis JP, Strath S, Swartz A (2009) How many days are enough? A study of 365 days of pedometer monitoring. Res Q Exerc Sport 80:445–453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin S, Jacobs DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, Richardson MT, Leon AS (1999) Intra-individual variation and estimates of usual physical activity. Ann Epidemiol 9:481–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JA (2007) Nonexercise activity thermogenesis—liberating the life-force. J Intern Med 262:273–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masse LC, Fuemmeler BF, Anderson CB, Matthews CE, Trost SG, Catellier DJ, Treuth M (2005) Accelerometer data reduction: a comparison of four reduction algorithms on select outcome variables. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:S544–S554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews CE (2002) Use of self-reports instruments to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed) Physical activity assessments for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 107–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews CE, Hebert JR, Freedson PS, Stanek EJ III, Merriam PA, Ebbeling CB, Ockene IS (2001) Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels in the seasonal variation of blood cholesterol study. Am J Epidemiol 153:987–995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews CE, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, Bassett DR Jr (2002) Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:1376–1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattocks C, Leary S, Ness A, Deere K, Saunders J, Kirkby J, Blair SN, Tilling K, Riddoch C (2007) Intraindividual variation of objectively measured physical activity in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:622–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw KO, Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1:30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger JS, Catellier DJ, Evenson KR, Treuth MS, Rosamond WD, Siega-Riz AM (2008) Patterns of objectively measured physical activity in the United States. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:630–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller R, Brown W (2004) Steps and sitting in a working population. Int J Behav Med 11:219–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montoye HJ (2000) Introduction: evaluation of some measurements of physical activity and energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S439–S441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paul DR, Kramer M, Stote KS, Spears KE, Moshfegh AJ, Baer DJ, Rumpler WV (2008) Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults. BMC Med Res Methodol 8:38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry MA, Hendrick PA, Hale L, Baxter GD, Milosavljevic S, Dean SG, McDonough SM, Hurley DA (2010) Utility of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer in free living: an investigation of adherence and data loss. Appl Ergon 41:469–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley K, Olds T, Hands B, Larkin D, Parker H (2009) Intra-individual variation in children’s physical activity patterns: Implications for measurement. J Sci Med Sport 12:568–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • St-Onge M, Mignault D, Allison DB, Rabasa-Lhoret R (2007) Evaluation of a portable device to measure daily energy expenditure in free-living adults. Am J Clin Nutr 85:42–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Togo F, Watanabe E, Park H, Yasunaga A, Park S, Shephard RJ, Aoyagi Y (2008) How many days of pedometer use predict the annual activity of the elderly reliably? Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:1058–1064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M (2008) Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:181–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR (2005) Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:S531–S543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Locke C, Ham SA, Macera CA, Ainsworth BE, Kirtland KA, Reis JP, Kimsey CD Jr (2004) Descriptive epidemiology of pedometer-determined physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1567–1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Locke C, Burkett L, Reis JP, Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Wilson DK (2005) How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults? Prev Med 40:293–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wareham NJ, Rennie KL (1998) The assessment of physical activity in individuals and populations: why try to be more precise about how physical activity is assessed? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22 Suppl 2:S30-S38

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren JM, Ekelund U, Besson H, Mezzani A, Geladas N, Vanhees L (2010) Assessment of physical activity—a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research: a report of the exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 17:127–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welk GJ, McClain JJ, Eisenmann JC, Wickel EE (2007) Field validation of the MTI Actigraph and BodyMedia armband monitor using the IDEEA monitor. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15:918–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerterp KR (2009) Assessment of physical activity: a critical appraisal. Eur J Appl Physiol 105:823–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickel EE, Welk GJ (2010) Applying generalizability theory to estimate habitual activity levels. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:1528–1534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

T. Scheers was funded by the Research Foundation Flanders.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tineke Scheers.

Additional information

Communicated by Klaas R Westerterp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheers, T., Philippaerts, R. & Lefevre, J. Variability in physical activity patterns as measured by the SenseWear Armband: how many days are needed?. Eur J Appl Physiol 112, 1653–1662 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2131-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2131-9

Keywords

Navigation