Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validity of the Actical for estimating free-living physical activity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) develop a refined 2-regression model for the Actical which predicts METs every 15 s, and (2) compare the refined and 2008 Crouter 2-regression models and the Klippel and Heil equations during free-living activity. To develop the refined 2-regression model, 48 participants (mean ± SD; age 35 ± 11.4 years) performed 10-min bouts of various activities ranging from sedentary to vigorous intensity. An Actical accelerometer was worn on the left hip, and a Cosmed K4b2 was used to measure oxygen consumption. For the free-living measurements, 29 participants (age, 38 ± 11.7 years; BMI, 25.0 ± 4.6 kg m−2) were monitored for approximately 6 h during work (N = 23) or leisure time (N = 9) while wearing an Actical and Cosmed. Actical prediction equations were compared against the Cosmed for METs and time spent in sedentary behaviors, light physical activity (LPA), moderate PA (MPA), vigorous PA (VPA), and moderate and vigorous PA (MVPA). The refined 2-regression model developed used an exponential regression equation and a linear equation to predict METs every 15 s for walking/running and intermittent lifestyle activities, respectively. Based on the free-living measurement, the refined 2-regression model was the only method that was not significantly different from the Cosmed for estimating time spent in sedentary behaviors, LPA, and MVPA (P > 0.05). On average, compared to the Cosmed, the refined 2-regression model and the Klippel and Heil equations had similar mean errors for average METs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet North Am Ed 1:307–310

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne NM, Hills AP, Hunter GR, Weinsier RL, Schutz Y (2005) Metabolic equivalent: one size does not fit all. J Appl Physiol 99(3):1112–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corder K, Brage S, Wareham NJ, Ekelund U (2005) Comparison of PAEE from combined and separate heart rate and movement models in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(10):1761–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter SE, Bassett DR Jr (2008) A new 2-regression model for the Actical accelerometer. Br J Sports Med 42(3):217–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter SE, Churilla JR, Bassett DR Jr (2006a) Estimating energy expenditure using accelerometers. Eur J Appl Physiol 98(6):601–612. doi:10.1007/s00421-006-0307-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter SE, Clowers KG, Bassett DR Jr (2006b) A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol 100(4):1324–1331. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00818.2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter SE, Churilla JR, Bassett DR Jr (2008) Accuracy of the Actiheart for the assessment of energy expenditure in adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 62:704–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter SE, Kuffel E, Haas JD, Frongillo EA, Bassett DR Jr (2009) A refined 2-regression model for the ActiGraph accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 4:2009. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c37458

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG (2008) Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci 26(14):1557–1565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JA, Benedict FG (1919) A biometric study of basal metabolism in men. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil DP (2006) Predicting activity energy expenditure using the Actical activity monitor. Res Q Exerc Sport 77(1):64–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klippel NJ, Heil DP (2003) Validation of energy expenditure prediction algorithms in adults using the Actical electronic activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35(suppl 5):S284

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozey S, Lyden K, Staudenmayer J, Freedson P (2010a) Errors in met estimates of physical activities using 3.5 ml × kg(−1)  × min(−1) as the baseline oxygen consumption. J Phys Act Health 7(4):508–516

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kozey SL, Lyden K, Howe CA, Staudenmayer JW, Freedson PS (2010b) Accelerometer output and met values of common physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42(9):1776–1784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuffel EE, Crouter SE, Haas JD, Frongillo EA, Bassett DR Jr (2008) Validity of estimating minute-by-minute energy expenditure with accelerometry (abstract). Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:S415

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin JE, King GA, Howley ET, Bassett DR Jr, Ainsworth BE (2001) Validation of the cosmed k4b2 portable metabolic system. Int J Sports Med 22(4):280–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer KA, McIver KL, Dowda M, Almeida MJ, Pate RR (2006) Validation and calibration of the actical accelerometer in preschool children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38(1):152–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Zakeri I, Butte NF (2004) Prediction of activity energy expenditure using accelerometers in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(9):1625–1631

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strath SJ, Bassett DR Jr, Swartz AM (2003) Comparison of mti accelerometer cut-points for predicting time spent in physical activity. Int J Sports Med 24(4):298–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay MS, Wolfson M, Gorber SC (2007) Canadian health measures survey: rationale, background, and overview. Health Rep 18(Suppl):7–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M (2008) Physical activity in the united states measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40(1):181–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Charlie and Mai Coffey Endowment in Exercise Science and NIH Grant 01R21 CA122430-01. No financial support was received from any of the activity monitor manufacturers, importers, or retailers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott E. Crouter.

Additional information

Communicated by Klaas Westerterp.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crouter, S.E., DellaValle, D.M., Horton, M. et al. Validity of the Actical for estimating free-living physical activity. Eur J Appl Physiol 111, 1381–1389 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1758-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1758-2

Keywords

Navigation