Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Energy systems contributions in 2,000 m race simulation: a comparison among rowing ergometers and water

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the energy system contributions of rowers in three different conditions: rowing on an ergometer without and with the slide and rowing in the water. For this purpose, eight rowers were submitted to 2,000 m race simulations in each of the situations defined above. The fractions of the aerobic (W AER), anaerobic alactic (W PCR) and anaerobic lactic (W [La]) systems were calculated based on the oxygen uptake, the fast component of excess post-exercise oxygen uptake and changes in net blood lactate, respectively. In the water, the metabolic work was significantly higher [(851 (82) kJ] than during both ergometer [674 (60) kJ] and ergometer with slide [663 (65) kJ] (P ≤ 0.05). The time in the water [515 (11) s] was higher (P < 0.001) than in the ergometers with [398 (10) s] and without the slide [402 (15) s], resulting in no difference when relative energy expenditure was considered: in the water [99 (9) kJ min−1], ergometer without the slide [99.6 (9) kJ min−1] and ergometer with the slide [100.2 (9.6) kJ min−1]. The respective contributions of the W AER, W PCR and W [La] systems were water = 87 (2), 7 (2) and 6 (2)%, ergometer = 84 (2), 7 (2) and 9 (2)%, and ergometer with the slide = 84 (2), 7 (2) and 9 (1)%. \( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{ 2} \), HR and lactate were not different among conditions. These results seem to indicate that the ergometer braking system simulates conditions of a bigger and faster boat and not a single scull. Probably, a 2,500 m test should be used to properly simulate in the water single-scull race.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Beneke R (1995) Anaerobic threshold, individual anaerobic threshold, and maximal lactate steady state in rowing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:863–867

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beneke R, Bleif I, Leithauser RM, Hutler M (2002) How anaerobic is the Wingate test? Eur J Appl Physiol 87:388–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beneke R, Beyer T, Jachner C, Erasmus J, Hutler M (2004) Energetics of karate kumite. Eur J Appl Physiol 92:518–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertuzzi RCM, Franchini E, Kokubun E, Kiss MAPDM (2007) Energy system contributions in indoor rock climbing. Eur J Appl Physiol 101:293–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • di Prampero PE, Ferretti G (1999) The energetics of anaerobic muscle metabolism: a reappraisal of older and recent concepts. Respir Physiol 118:10–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott B, Lyttle A, Birkett O (2002) The RowPerfect ergometer: a training aid for on-water single scull rowing. Sports Biomech 1:123–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman L (2005) Ergometer technique. In: Volker N (ed) Rowing faster. Champaing, Human Kinetics, pp 159–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman FC (1994) Physiology and nutrition for rowing. In: Lamb DR, Knuttgen HG, Murray R (eds) Physiology and nutrition for competitive sport. Cooper Publishing Group, Carmel, pp 221–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman FC (2000) Physiology of competitive rowing. In: Garret WE Jr, Kirkendall DT (eds) Exercise and sport science. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 843–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman FC, Connors MC, Gault JA, Hagerman GR, Polinski WJ (1978) Energy expenditure during simulated rowing. J Appl Physiol 45:87–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hausswirth C, Bigard AX LE, Chevalier JM (1997) The Cosmed K4 telemetry system as an accurate device for oxygen uptake measurements during exercise. Int J Sports Med 18:449–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jürimäe J, Mäestu J, Jürimäe T, Pihl E (2000) Prediction of rowing performance on single sculls from metabolic and anthropometric variables. J Hum Mov Stud 38:123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda DA, Jensen RL, Williams SE, Watts PB (2008) Effects of drag factor on physiological aspects of rowing. Int J Sports Med 29:390–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäestu J, Jürimäe J, Jürimäe T (2000) Prediction of rowing performance from selected physiological variables—differences between lightweight and open class rowers. Med Sport 53:247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäestu J, Jürimäe J, Jürimäe T (2005) Monitoring of performance and training in rowing. Sports Med 35:597–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Messonnier L, Aranda-Berthouze SE, Bourdin M, Bredel Y, Lacour J (2005) Rowing performance and estimated training load. Int J Sports Med 26:376–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mickelson TC, Hagerman FC (1982) Anaerobic threshold measurements of elite oarsmen. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:440–444

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pripstein LP, Rhodes EC, McKenzie DC, Coutts KD (1999) Aerobic and anaerobic energy during a 2-km race simulation in female rowers. Eur J Appl Physiol 79:491–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riechman SE, Zoller RF, Balasekaran G, Goss FL, Robertson RJ (2002) Prediction of 2000 m indoor rowing performance using a 30 s sprint and maximal oxygen uptake. J Sports Sci 20:681–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russel AP, Rossignol PFLE, Sparrow WA (1998) Prediction of elite schoolboy 2000-m rowing ergometer performance from metabolic, anthropometric and strength variables. J Sports Sci 16:749–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all athletes and their coaches for their committed participation. This study was supported by a grant from CNPq (470572/2007-8)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emerson Franchini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Campos Mello, F., de Moraes Bertuzzi, R.C., Grangeiro, P.M. et al. Energy systems contributions in 2,000 m race simulation: a comparison among rowing ergometers and water. Eur J Appl Physiol 107, 615–619 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1172-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1172-9

Keywords

Navigation