European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 101, Issue 4, pp 495–502 | Cite as

Short-term effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields after physical exercise are dependent on autonomic tone before exposure

  • V. Grote
  • H. Lackner
  • C. Kelz
  • M. Trapp
  • F. Aichinger
  • H. Puff
  • M. MoserEmail author
Original Article


The therapeutic application of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) can accelerate healing after bone fractures and also alleviate pain according to several studies. However, no objective criteria have been available to ensure appropriate magnetic field strength or type of electromagnetic field. Moreover, few studies so far have investigated the physical principles responsible for the impact of electromagnetic fields on the human body. Existing studies have shown that PEMFs influence cell activity, the autonomic nervous system and the blood flow. The aim of this study is to examine the instantaneous and short-term effects of a PEMF therapy and to measure the impact of different electromagnetic field strengths on a range of physiological parameters, especially the autonomic nervous systems, determined by heart rate variability (HRV) as well as their influence on subjects’ general feeling of well-being. The study comprised experimental, double-blind laboratory tests during which 32 healthy male adults (age: 38.4 ± 6.5 years) underwent four physical stress tests at standardised times followed by exposure to pulsed magnetic fields of varying intensity [HPM, High Performance magnetic field; Leotec; pulsed signal; mean intensity increase: zero (placebo), 0.005, 0.03 and 0.09 T/s]. Exposure to electromagnetic fields after standardised physical effort significantly affected the very low frequency power spectral components of HRV (VLF; an indicator for sympathetically controlled blood flow rhythms). Compared to placebo treatment, exposure to 0.005 T/s resulted in accelerated recovery after physical strain. Subjects with lower baseline VLF power recovered more quickly than subjects with higher VLF when exposed to higher magnetic field strengths. The application of electromagnetic fields had no effect on subjects’ general feeling of well-being. Once the magnetic field exposure was stopped, the described effects quickly subsided. PEMF exposure has a short-term dosage-dependent impact on healthy subjects. Exposure to PEMF for 20 min resulted in more rapid recovery of heart rate variability, especially in the very low frequency range after physical strain. The study also showed the moderating influence of the subjects’ constitutional VLF power on their response to PEMF treatment. These findings have since been replicated in a clinical study and should be taken into consideration when PEMF treatment is chosen.


Magnetic field effects PEMF Heart rate variability Very-low-frequency Recovery 


  1. Bassett CA (1989) Fundamental and practical aspects of therapeutic uses of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). Crit Rev Biomed Eng 17(5):451–529PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Carney RM, Blumenthal JA, Freedland KE, Stein PK, Howells WB, Berkman LF, Watkins LL, Czajkowski SM, Hayano J, Domitrovich PP, Jaffe AS (2005) Low heart rate variability and the effect of depression on post-myocardial infarction mortality. Arch Intern Med 165(13):1486–1491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheing GL, Wan JW, Kai Lo S (2005) Ice and pulsed electromagnetic field to reduce pain and swelling after distal radius fractures. J Rehabil Med 37(6):372–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Mattei M, Caruso A, Traina GC, Pezzetti F, Baroni T, Sollazzo V (1999) Correlation between pulsed electromagnetic fields exposure time and cell proliferation increase in human osteosarcoma cell lines and human normal osteoblast cells in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 20(3):177–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diniz P, Shomura K, Soejima K, Ito G (2002) Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation on bone tissue like formation are dependent on the maturation stages of the osteoblasts. Bioelectromagnetics 23(5):398–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dortch AB, Johnson MT (2006) Characterization of pulsed magnetic field therapy in a rat model for rheumatoid arthritis. Biomed Sci Instrum 42:302–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fassina L, Visai L, Benazzo F, Benedetti L, Calligaro A, De Angelis MG, Farina A, Maliardi V, Magenes G (2006) Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on calcified matrix production by SAOS-2 cells over a polyurethane porous scaffold. Tissue Eng 12(7):1985–1999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitzsimmons RJ, Ryaby JT, Magee FP, Baylink DJ (1994) Combined magnetic fields increased net calcium flux in bone cells. Calcif Tissue Int 55(5):376–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fleisher LA, Frank SM, Sessler DI, Cheng C, Matsukawa T, Vannier CA (1996) Thermoregulation and heart rate variability. Clin Sci 90:97–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaykema RP, Goehler LE, Tilders FJ, Bol JG, McGorry M, Fleshner M, Maier SF, Watkins LR (1998) Bacterial endotoxin induces fos immunoreactivity in primary afferent neurons of the vagus nerve. Neuroimmunomodulation 5(5):234–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graham C, Sastre A, Cook M, Gerkovich M (2000) Nocturnal magnetic field exposure: gender-specific effects on heart rate variability and sleep. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1936–1941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hadase M, Azuma A, Zen K, Asada S, Kawasaki T, Kamitani T, Kawasaki S, Sugihara H, Matsubara H (2004) Very low frequency power of heart rate variability is a powerful predictor of clinical prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure. Circ J 68(4):343–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heermeier K, Spanner M, Trager J, Gradinger R, Strauss PG, Kraus W, Schmidt J (1998) Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (EMF) on collagen type I mRNA expression and extracellular matrix synthesis of human osteoblastic cells. Bioelectromagnetics 19(4):222–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobi V (1985) Basler Befindlichkeits-Skala. Weinheim: Beltz Test GesellschaftGoogle Scholar
  15. Icaro Cornaglia A, Casasco M, Riva F, Farina A, Fassina L, Visai L, Casasco A (2006) Stimulation of osteoblast growth by an electromagnetic field in a model of bone-like construct. Eur J Histochem 50(3):199–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ichioka S, Iwasaka M, Shibata M, Harii K, Kamiya A, Ueno S (1998) Biological effects of static magnetic fields on the microcirculatory blood flow in vivo: a preliminary report. Med-Biol-Eng-Comput 36(1):91–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanai S, Taniguchi N, Kawamoto M, Endo H, Higashino H (2004) Effect of static magnetic field on pain associated with frozen shoulder. Pain-Clinic 16(2):173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keen EN, Sloan AW (1958) Observations on the Harvard Step Test. J Appl Physiol 13:241–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleinbaum K (1978) Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Duxbury Press. North ScituateGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuo, Terry BJ, Tsann Lin, Cheryl Yang CH, Chia-Lin Li, Chieh-Fu Chen, Pesus Chou (1999) Effect of aging on gender differences in neural control of heart rate. Am J Physiol 277 (Heart Circ Physiol 46):2233–2239Google Scholar
  21. Lee JH, McLeod KJ (2000) Morphologic responses of osteoblast-like cells in onolayer culture to ELF electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 21(2):129–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lyskov E, Kalezic N, Markov M, Mild KH, Thunberg J, Johansson H (2005) Low frequency therapeutic EMF differently influences experimental muscle pain in female and male subjects. Bioelectromagnetics 26(4):299–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Markov MS, Colbert AP (2000) Magnetic and electromagnetic field therapy. J Back Muscular Rehabil 14:1–13Google Scholar
  24. McKay JC, Prato FS, Thomas AW (2006) A literature review: The effects of magnetic field exposure on blood flow and blood vessels in the microvasculature. Bioelectromagnetics 28(2):81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miksa M, Wu R, Zhou M, Wang P (2005) Sympathetic excitotoxicity in sepsis: pro-inflammatory priming of macrophages by norepinephrine. Front Biosci 10:2217–2229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moser M, Gallasch E, Rafolt D, Jernej G, Kemp C, Moser-Kneffel E, Kenner T, Baevskij R, Funtowa I (1992) Cardiovascular monitoring in microgravity: The experiments PULSTRANS and SLEEP. In: Austrian Society for Aerospace Medicine (edts) Health from Space Research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 167–189Google Scholar
  27. Moser M, Lehofer M, Sedminek A, Lux M, Zapotoczky HG, Kenner T, Noordergraaf A (1994) Heart rate variability as a prognostic tool in cardiology. Circulation 90:1078–1082PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Moser M, Lehofer M, Hoehn-Saric R, McLeod DR, Hildebrandt G, Steinbrenner B, Voica M, Liebmann P, Zapotoczky H (1998) Increased heart rate in depressed subjects in spite of unchanged autonomic balance? J Affect Disord 48:115–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Brien IA, O’Hare P, Corrall RJM (1986) Heart rate variability in healthy subjects: effect of age and the derivation of normal ranges for tests of autonomic function. Br Heart J 55:348–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Owegi R, Johnson MT (2006) Localized pulsed magnetic fields for tendonitis therapy. Biomed Sci Instrum 42:428–433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pilla AA (2006) Mechanisms and therapeutic applications of time varying and static magnetic fields. In: Barnes F, Greenebaum B (eds) Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetic fields, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (in press)Google Scholar
  32. Quittan M, Schuhfried O, Wiesinger GF, Fialka-Moser V (2000) Klinische Wirksamkeiten der Magnetfeldtherapie - eine Literaturübersicht. Acta Med Austriaca 27:61–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sait ML, Wood AW, Sadafi HA (1999) A study of heart rate and heart rate variability in human subjects exposed to occupational levels of 50 Hz circularly polarised magnetic fields. Med Eng Phys 21(5):361–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sastre A, Cook MR, Graham C (1998) Nocturnal exposure to intermittent 60 Hz magnetic fields alters human cardiac rhythm. Bioelectromagnetics 19(2):98–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shahabi S, Hassan ZM, Jazani NH, Ebtekar M (2006) Sympathetic nervous system plays an important role in the relationship between immune mediated diseases. Med Hypotheses 67(4):900–903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shupak NM, McKay JC, Nielson WR, Rollman GB, Prato FS, Thomas AW (2006) Exposure to a specific pulsed low-frequency magnetic field: a double-blind placebo-controlled study of effects on pain ratings in rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia patients. Pain Res Manag 11(2):85–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Stepansky R, Jahn O, Windischbauer G, Zeitlhofer J (2000) Elektromagnetische Felder - Auswirkungen auf die Gesundheit. AMA Acta Med Austr 27(3):69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tabor Z, Michalski J, Rokita E (2004) Influence of 50 Hz magnetic field on human heart rate variability: linear and nonlinear analysis. Bioelectromagnetics 25:474–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Task Force of the ESC, NASPE (1996) Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use (Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology). Eur Heart J 17:354–381Google Scholar
  40. Taylor JA, Carr DL, Myers CW, Eckberg DL (1998) Mechanisms underlying very-low-frequency RR-interval oscillations in humans. Circulation 98:547–555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Umetani K, Singer DH, McCraty R, Atkinson M (1998) Twenty-four hour time domain heart rate variability and heart rate: relations to age and gender over nine decades. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:593–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yuge L, Okubo A, Miyashita T, Kumagai T, Nikawa T, Takeda S, Kanno M, Urabe Y, Sugiyama M, Kataoka K (2003) Physical stress by magnetic force accelerates differentiation of human osteoblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 311(1):32–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Grote
    • 1
  • H. Lackner
    • 1
  • C. Kelz
    • 1
  • M. Trapp
    • 1
  • F. Aichinger
    • 2
  • H. Puff
    • 3
  • M. Moser
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Noninvasive Diagnosis, JOANNEUM RESEARCHWeizAustria
  2. 2.Clinical PracticeLinzAustria
  3. 3.Humanomed CentreAlthofenAustria
  4. 4.Physiological InstituteMedical University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations