Abstract
Mechanomyography has shown that “resting” muscle is mechanically active, with greater activity after vigorous exercise. This experiment studied the post-exercise resting mechanomyography activity that results from different levels of exercise; the effects of exercise levels on the contralateral non-exercised limb; and the effects of resting muscle length on post-exercise resting mechanomyographic activity. Ten healthy volunteers had mechanomyography recordings over both mid-rectus femoris, at rest, before and after sets (1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 repetitions) of right leg extensions on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60 s−1. Sets were performed a week apart, after only sedentary activity during the previous two hours. No definite threshold effect was shown. There was a linear correlation between mechanomyography and work done (R = 0.61, P < 0.01). There was a positive correlation of change of activity between the two thighs (R = 0.62, P < 0.01), with the non-exercised thigh demonstrating about half the activity of the exercised thigh. Finally, we observed that mechanomyographic activity was greater when rectus femoris muscle length was shorter (i.e. when the leg was extended versus flexed). We conclude that resting mechanomyography increases with increasing work and that there is a cross-over for increase in mechanomyography in the non-exercised leg, suggesting a neural mechanism. The greater mechanomyographic activity at shorter muscle lengths suggests that muscle that is less stretched could more freely oscillate, producing higher MMG amplitudes. Altered activity of the muscle spindle gamma loop or Golgi tendon apparatus may also play a role in altered activity with different muscle length.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akataki K, Mita K, Watakabe M, Ito K (2002) Age-related change in motor unit activation strategy in force production: a mechanomyographic investigation. Muscle Nerve 25:505–512
Candow DG, Chilibeck PD, Burke DG, Davison KS, Smith-Palmer T (2001) Effect of glutamine supplementation combined with resistance training in young adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 86:142–149
deVries HA (1965) Muscle tonus in postural muscles. Am J Phys Med 44:275–291
deVries HA (1976) Relationship of resting EMG level to total body metabolism with reference to the origin of “tissue noise”. Am J Phys Med 55:139–147
Ebersole KT, Housh TJ, Johnson GO, Evetovich TK, Smith DB, Perry SR (1998) The effect of leg flexion angle on the mechanomyographic responses to isometric muscle actions. Eur J Appl Physiol 78:264–269
Enoka RM (1988) Muscle strength and its development: new perspectives. Sports Med 6:146–168
Esposito F, Malgrati D, Veicsteinas A, Orizio C (1996) Time and frequency domain analysis of electromyogram and sound myogram in the elderly. Eur J Appl Physiol 73:503–510
Esposito F, Ce E, Gobbo M, Veicsteinas A, Orizio C (2005) Surface EMG and mechanomyogram disclose isokinetic training effects on quadriceps muscle in elderly people. Eur J Appl Physiol 94:549–557
Farthing JP, Chilibeck PD (2003) The effect of eccentric training at different velocities on cross-education. Eur J Appl Physiol 89:570–577
Jacobson E (1943) Innervation and tonus of striated muscle in man. J Nerv Ment Dis 97:197–203
Jacobson E (1951) Muscular tension and the estimation of effort. Am J Psychol 64:112–124
Jaskolska A, Kisiel K, Brzenczek W, Jaskolski A (2003) EMG and MMG of synergists and antagonists during relaxation at three joint angles. Eur J Appl Physiol 90:58–68
Jaskolska A, Brzenczek W, Kisiel-Sajewicz K, Kawczynski A, Marusiak J, Jaskolski A (2004) The effect of skinfold on frequency of human muscle mechanomyogram. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14(2):217–225
Jaskolska A, Kisiel-Sajewicz K, Brzenczek-OwkzarzakW, Yue GH, Jaskolski A (2006) EMG and MMG of agonist and antagonist muscles as a function of age and joint angle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 16:89–102
Joseph J, Nightingale A, Williams PL (1955) A detailed study of the electric potentials recorded over some postural muscles while relaxed and standing. J Physiol 127:617–625
Lerman J (1996) Study design in clinical research: sample size estimation and power analysis. Can J Anaesth 43:184–191
McKay WPS, Gregson PH, McKay BWS, Blanchet T (1998) Resting muscle sounds in anaesthetised patients. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 76:401–406
McKay WPS, Chilibeck PD, Chad KE, Daku BLF (2004) Resting mechanomyography after aerobic exercise. Can J Appl Physiol 29:743–757
Miyamoto N, Oda S (2003) Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses of the triceps surae during maximal voluntary contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13:451–459
Orizio C, Gobbo M, Diemont B, Esposito F, Veicsteinas A (2003) The surface mechanomyogram as a tool to describe the influence of fatigue on biceps brachii motor unit activation strategy. Historical basis and novel evidence. Eur J Appl Physiol 90(3–4):326–336
Orizio C (1993) Muscle sound: bases for the introduction of a mechanomyographic signal in muscle studies. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 21(3):201–243
Oster G, Jaffe JS (1980) Low frequency sounds from sustained contraction of human skeletal muscle. Biophys J 30:119–128
Pearson CE (ed) (1983) Handbook of applied mathematics: selected results and methods, 2nd edn. Van Nosrand Reinhold, New York
Weir JP, Ayers KM, Lacefield JF, Walsh KL (2000) Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during fatigue in humans: influence of muscle length. Eur J Appl Physiol 81:352–359
Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19(1):231–240
Zhou S (2000) Chronic neural adaptations to unilateral exercise: mechanisms of cross education. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 28:177–184
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to the participants, who came and performed faithfully 5 weeks in a row.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKay, W.P.S., Jacobson, P., Chilibeck, P.D. et al. Effects of graded levels of exercise on ipsilateral and contralateral post-exercise resting rectus femoris mechanomyography. Eur J Appl Physiol 98, 566–574 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-006-0301-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-006-0301-y