European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 93, Issue 5–6, pp 547–554

Body size as a determinant of the 1-h cycling record at sea level and altitude

Original Article

Abstract

This study was designed to validate models for predicting the two Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) classifications for the 1-h cycling record at sea level and altitude. Specific attention was paid to the integration of model components that were sensitive to scaling differences in body mass (mb). The Modern Aero Position model predicted UCI Best Hour performances using predictions of total projected frontal area (AP) that included use of an aerodynamic bicycle and aerodynamic handlebars. The Traditional Racing Position model predicted UCI Hour Record performances using predictions of total AP that include use of a “Merckx-era” bicycle with drop-style handlebars. Prediction equations for AP, as well as the coefficient of drag and metabolic power output , involved scaling relationships with mb, while other model components were similar to previously published 1-h models. Both models were solved for the distance cycled in 1 h (DHR) using an iterative strategy. Chris Boardman’s current records for the UCI Best Hour Performance (56.375 km) and the UCI Hour Record (49.202 km) were underpredicted by only 0.332 km (-0.6%) and 0.239 km (-0.5%). Both models, regardless of altitude, suggested that DHR should scale with mb to the +0.174 power (DHRmb+0.174), which is lower than the +0.32 exponent recently suggested in the literature. Lastly, the same models also predicted that six-time Tour de France winner, Lance Armstrong, could exceed both of Boardman’s current records at sea level by about 2.0 km.

Keywords

Aerodynamics Bicycle Body mass scaling Modeling Power output 

References

  1. Astrand PO, Rodahl K (1986) Textbook of work physiology. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 363, 391–411Google Scholar
  2. Bassett DR, Kyle CR, Passfield L, Broker JP, Burke ER (1999) Comparing cycling world records, 1967–1996: modeling with empirical data. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:1665–1676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Capelli C, di Prampero PE (1995) Effects of altitude on top speeds during 1 h unaccompanied cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 71:469–471Google Scholar
  4. Coyle EF, Feltner ME, Kautz SA, Hamilton MT, Montain SJ, Baylor AM, Abraham LD, Petrek GW (1991) Physiological and biomechanical factors associated with elite endurance cycling performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23:93–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Heil DP (1997a) Body mass scaling of peak oxygen uptake in 20- to 79-yr-old adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:1602–1608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Heil DP (1997b) Body mass scaling of oxygen uptake and power output at peak and ventilatory threshold in competitive cyclists. Res Q Exerc Sport 68:A-22Google Scholar
  7. Heil DP (2001) Body mass scaling of projected frontal area in competitive cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol 85:358–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Heil DP (2002) Body mass scaling of frontal area in competitive cyclists without aerobars. Eur J Appl Physiol 87:520–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE (1988) Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, 2nd edn. Belmon, Calif.: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kyle CR (1996) Selecting cycling equipment. In: Burke ER (eds) High tech cycling. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill., pp 6–7Google Scholar
  11. Nevill AM, Holder RL (1995) Scaling, normalizing, and per ratio standards: an allometric modeling approach. J Appl Physiol 79:1027–1031PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nevill AM, Ramsbottom R, Williams C (1992) Scaling physiological measurements for individuals of different body size. Eur J Appl Physiol 65:110–117Google Scholar
  13. Olds T (1992) The optimal altitude for cycling performance: a mathematical model. Excel 8:155–159Google Scholar
  14. Olds TS, Norton KI, Craig NP (1993) Mathematical model of cycling performance. J Appl Physiol 75:730–737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Olds T, Norton K, Craig N, Olive S, Lowe E (1995a) The limits of the possible: models of power supply and demand in cycling. Australian J Sci Med Sport 27:29–33Google Scholar
  16. Olds TS, Norton KI, Lowe ELA, Olive S, Reay F, Ly S (1995b) Modeling road-cycling performance. J Appl Physiol 78:1596–1611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Padilla S, Mujika I, Cuesta G, Goiriena JJ (1999) Level ground and uphill cycling ability in professional road cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:878–885CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Padilla S, Mujika I, Angulo F, Goiriena JJ (2000) Scientific approach to the 1-h cycling world record: a case study. J Appl Physiol 89:1522–1527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Prampero PE di (2000) Cycling on Earth, in space, on the Moon. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:345–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Prampero PE di, Cortilli G, Mognoni P, Saibene F (1979) Equation of motion of a cyclist. J Appl Physiol 47:201–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pugh LGCE (1974) The relation of oxygen intake and speed in competition cycling and comparative observations on the bicycle ergometer. J Physiol (Lond) 241:795–808Google Scholar
  22. Swain DP (1994) The influence of body mass in endurance bicycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26:58–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. West JB (1996) Prediction of barometric pressures at high altitudes with the use of model atmospheres. J Appl Physiol 81:1850–1854PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. West JB (1999) Barometric pressures on Mt. Everest: new data and physiological significance. J Appl Physiol 86:1062–1066CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health and Human DevelopmentMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA

Personalised recommendations