Skip to main content

Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between somatosensory event-related potentials (ERP) and the variation of reaction time (RT). For this purpose, we recorded the ERPs (N250 and P300) in fast- and slow-reaction trials during a somatosensory discrimination task. Strong, standard, and weak target electrical stimuli were randomly delivered to the left median nerve at the wrist with a random interstimulus interval (900–1,100 ms). All the subjects were instructed to respond by pressing a button with their right thumb as fast as possible whenever a target stimulus was presented. We divided all the trials into fast- and slow-RT trials and averaged the data. N250 latency tended to be delayed when the RT was slow, but not significantly. P300 latency was delayed significantly when the RT was slow, but to a much lesser extent than the RT delay, so we concluded that the change of RT was not fully determined by the processes reflected by the somatosensory N250 or P300. Furthermore, the larger and earlier P300 in the fast-RT trials implied that when larger amounts of attentional resources were allocated to a given task, the speed of stimulus evaluation somewhat increased and RT was shortened to a great extent. N250 amplitude did not significantly vary in the two RT clusters. In conclusion, the somatosensory N250 reflects active target detection, which is relatively independent of the modulation of the response speed, whereas the somatosensory P300 could change without manipulation of either the stimulus or the response processing demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

References

  • Abbruzzese M, Ratto S, Abbruzzese G, Favale E (1985) Electroneurographic correlates of the monosynaptic reflex: experimental studies and normative data. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 48:434–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudena P, Halgren E, Heit G, Clarke JM (1995) Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94:251–264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyant P, Garcia-Larrea L, Mauguiere F (1993) Target side and scalp topography of the somatosensory P300. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88:468–477

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke JM, Halgren E, Chauvel P (1999) Intracranial ERPs in humans during a lateralized visual oddball task. II. Temporal, parietal, and frontal recordings. Clinical Neurophysiol 110:1226–1244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donchin E, Coles MGH (1988) Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Brain Behav Sci 100:357–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucet C, Stelmack MR (1999) The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time. Psychophysiology 36:351–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukoshima Y, Yamashita N, Shimada Y (1982) Facilitation of H-reflex by homonymous Ia-afferent fibres in man. J Neurophysiol 48:1079–1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross J, Tass PA, Salenius S, Hari R, Freund H-J, Schnitzler A (2000) Cortico-muscular synchronization during isometric muscle contraction in humans as revealed by magnetoencephalography. J Physiol (Lond) 527:623–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Halgren E, Baudena P, Clarke JM, Heit G, Liegeois C, Chauvel P, Musolino A (1995a) Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. I.Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94:191–220

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halgren E, Baudena P, Clarke JM, Heit G, Marinkovic K, Devaux B, Vignal J-P, Biraben A (1995b) Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94:229–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halgren E, Marinkovic K, Chauvel P (1998) Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 106:156–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito J, Shibasaki H, Kimura J (1992) Somatosensory event-related potentials following different stimulus conditions. Int J Neurosci 65:239–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jossiasen RC, Shagass C, Roemer RA, Ercegovac DV and Straumanis JJ (1982) Somatosensory evoked potential changes with a selective attention task. Psychophysiology 19:146–159

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kekoni J, Hämäläinen H, McCloud V, Reinekainen K Näätänen R (1996) Is the somatosensory N250 related to deviance discrimination or conscious target detection? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100:115–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kekoni J, Hämäläinen H, Mikael S, Grohn J, Reinekainen K, Lehtokoski A, Näätänen R (1997) Rate effect and mismatch responses in the somatosensory system: ERP-recordings in humans. Biol Psychol 46:125–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knight RT (1990) Neural mechanisms of event-related potentials: evidence from human lesion studies. In: Rohrbaugh JW, Parasuraman R, Johnson Jr R (eds) Event-related brain potentials: basic issues and applications. Oxford University Press, New York pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok A (1997) Event-related (ERP) reflections of mental resources: a review and synthesis. Biol Psychol 45:19–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kok A (2001) On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38:557–577

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer AF, Strayer DL (1988) Assessing the development of automatic processing: an application of dual-track and event-related brain potential methodologies. Biol Psychol 26:231–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kujala T, Alho K, Kekoni J, Hamalainen H, Reinikainen K, Salonen O, Sandertskjold-Nordenstam C-G, Näätänen R (1995) Auditory and somatosensory event-related brain potentials in blind humans. Exp Brain Res 104:519–526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, McCarthy G, Donchin E (1977) Augmenting mental chronometry: the P3 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 197:792–795

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy G, Donchin E (1981) A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science 197:792–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Misiaszek JE, Cheng J, Brooke JD (1995) Movement-induced depression of solues H-reflexes is consistent in humans over the range of excitatory afferents involved. Brain Res 702:271–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen R (1992) Attention and brain function. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 236–347

  • Novak GP, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr, Wiznitzer ML (1990) Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75:255–275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfefferbaum A, Ford J, Johnson R (1983) Manipulation of P3 latency: speed vs accuracy instructions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55:188–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI (1978) Chronometric explorations of mind. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

  • Ritter W, Simson R, Vaughan HG Jr, (1979) A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. Science 203:1358–1361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter W, Paavilainen P, Lavilainen J, Reinikainen K, Alho K, Sams M, Naatanen R (1992) Event-related potentials to repetition and change to auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 83:306–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Day BL, Boyd S, Marsden CD (1991) Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Exp Physiol 76:159–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sams M, Paavilainen P, Alho K, Naatanen R (1985) Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 62:437–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R A (2000) Motor learning and performance: from principles to practice. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith ME, Halgren E, Sokolik M, Baudena P, Musolino A, Liegeois-Chauvel C, Chauvel P (1990) The intracranial topography of the P3 event-related potential elicited during auditory oddball. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 76:235–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stains WR, Brooke JD, Cheng J, Misiaszek JE, MacKay WA (1997) Movement-induced gain modulation of somatosensory potentials and solues H-reflexes evoked from the leg. I. Kinaesthetic task demands. Exp Brain Res 115:147–155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarkka IM, Micheloyannis S, Stokic DS (1996) Generators for human P300 elicited by somatosensory stimuli using multiple dipole source analysis. Neuroscience 75:275–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Titiinen H, May P, Reinekainen K, Näätänen R (1994) Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature. 372:90–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Valeriani M, Fraioli L, Ranghi F, Giaquinto S (2001) Dipolar source modeling of the P300 event-related potential after somatosensory stimulation. Muscle Nerve 24:1677–1687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verleger R (1997) On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology 34:131–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens C, Kramer A, Vanasse L, Donchin E (1983) The performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information processing resources. Science 221:1080–1082

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by the Nishihira/Tsukuba Project of COE (Center of Excellence) from the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuo Kida.

Additional information

Tetsuo Kida is participating in the doctoral program in Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kida, T., Nishihira, Y., Hatta, A. et al. Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time. Eur J Appl Physiol 89, 326–330 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0801-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0801-y

Keywords

  • Attention
  • N250
  • P300
  • Somatosensory
  • Reaction time