Study of the validity of a job–exposure matrix for the job strain model factors: an update and a study of changes over time
- 246 Downloads
The objectives of the study were to construct a job–exposure matrix (JEM) for psychosocial work factors of the job strain model, to evaluate its validity, and to compare the results over time.
The study was based on national representative data of the French working population with samples of 46,962 employees (2010 SUMER survey) and 24,486 employees (2003 SUMER survey). Psychosocial work factors included the job strain model factors (Job Content Questionnaire): psychological demands, decision latitude, social support, job strain and iso-strain. Job title was defined by three variables: occupation and economic activity coded using standard classifications, and company size. A JEM was constructed using a segmentation method (Classification and Regression Tree—CART) and cross-validation.
The best quality JEM was found using occupation and company size for social support. For decision latitude and psychological demands, there was not much difference using occupation and company size with or without economic activity. The validity of the JEM estimates was higher for decision latitude, job strain and iso-strain, and lower for social support and psychological demands. Differential changes over time were observed for psychosocial work factors according to occupation, economic activity and company size.
This study demonstrated that company size in addition to occupation may improve the validity of JEMs for psychosocial work factors. These matrices may be time-dependent and may need to be updated over time. More research is needed to assess the validity of JEMs given that these matrices may be able to provide exposure assessments to study a range of health outcomes.
KeywordsPsychosocial work factors Job stress Job strain Job–exposure matrix Job title Occupation Economic activity Company size
The authors thank the members of the DARES (French ministry of labour), all the occupational physicians and ‘médecins inspecteurs régionaux du travail’, and all the employees who participated to the SUMER survey and made this study possible. The authors also thank Laure Ngabirano for her help in the check of the data related to occupation and economic activity.
This study was funded by the French National Research Program for Environmental and Occupational Health of ANSES, France (Grant no. EST-2016/1/49).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bouyer J, Hemon D (1993) Studying the performance of a job exposure matrix. Int J Epidemiol 22(Suppl 2):S65–S71Google Scholar
- Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA (1984) Classification and regression trees. Taylor & Francis, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
- Eurostat (2002) NACE—statistical classification of economic activities in the European community, Rev. 1.1, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
- Fermanian J (1984) Measurement of agreement between 2 judges. Qualitative cases. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publ 32(2):140–147Google Scholar
- Frese M, Zapf D (1988) Methodological issues in the study of work stress: objective vs subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In: Cooper CL, Payne R (eds) Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work. Wiley series on studies in occupational stress. Wiley, Chichester, pp 375–411Google Scholar
- INSEE (2003a) Nomenclature des professions et catégories socio-professionnelles 2003. INSEE, Nomenclatures et codes, ParisGoogle Scholar
- INSEE (2003b) Nomenclatures d’activités et de produits françaises—Edition 2003. INSEE, Nomemclatures et codes, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Milner A, Niedhammer I, Chastang JF, Spittal MJ, Lamontagne AD (2016) Validity of a job-exposure matrix for psychosocial job stressors: results from the household income and labour dynamics in Australia survey. PLoS One 11(4):e0152980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152980 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Niedhammer I, Chastang J, Gendrey L, David S, Degioanni S (2006) Propriétés psychométriques de la version française des échelles de la demande psychologique, de la latitude décisionnelle et du soutien social du “Job Content Questionnaire” de Karasek: résultats de l’enquête nationale SUMER. Santé Publique 18(3):413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Niedhammer I, Sultan-Taieb H, Chastang JF, Vermeylen G, Parent-Thirion A (2014) Fractions of cardiovascular diseases and mental disorders attributable to psychosocial work factors in 31 countries in Europe. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87(4):403–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0879-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Niedhammer I, Lesuffleur T, Coutrot T, Chastang JF (2016) Contribution of working conditions to occupational inequalities in depressive symptoms: results from the national French SUMER survey. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 89(6):1025–1037 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-016-1142-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Office IL (1990) International standard classification of occupations (ISCO-88). International Labour Office, GenevaGoogle Scholar