Shift work, long working hours and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose

Specific physical activities or working conditions are suspected for increasing the risk of preterm birth (PTB). The aim of this meta-analysis is to review and summarize the pre-existing evidence on the effect of shift work or long working hours on the risk of PTB.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE (1990–2013) for observational and intervention studies with original data. We only included articles that met our specific criteria for language, exposure, outcome, data collection and original data that were of at least of moderate quality. The data of the included studies were pooled.

Results

Eight high-quality studies and eight moderate-quality studies were included in the meta-analysis. In these studies, no clear or statistically significant relationship between shift work and PTB was found. The summary estimate OR for performing shift work during pregnancy and the risk of PTB were 1.04 (95 % CI 0.90–1.20). For long working hours during pregnancy, the summary estimate OR was 1.25 (95 % CI 1.01–1.54), indicating a marginally statistically significant relationship but an only slightly elevated risk.

Conclusion

Although in many of the included studies a positive association between long working hours and PTB was seen this did reach only marginal statistical significance. In the studies included in this review, working in shifts or in night shifts during pregnancy was not significantly associated with an increased risk for PTB. For both risk factors, due to the lack of high-quality studies focusing on the risks per trimester, in particular the third trimester, a firm conclusion about an association cannot be stated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Bonzini M, Coggon D, Palmer KT (2007) Risk of prematurity, low birth weight and pre-eclampsia in relation to working hours and physical activities: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 64:228–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonzini M, Coggon D, Godfrey K et al (2009) Occupational physical activities, working hours and outcome of pregnancy: findings from the Southampton Women’s Survey. Occup Environ Med 66:685–690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonzini M, Palmer KT, David C, Michele C, Antonella C, Ferrario MM (2011) Shift work and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of currently available epidemiologic studies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 118(12):1429–1437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Both M, Overvest MA, Wildhagen MF, Golding J, Wildschut HIJ (2010) The association of daily physical activity and birth outcome: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol 25:421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cerón-Mireles P, Harlow SD, Sánchez-Carrillo CI (1996) The risk of prematurity and small-for-gestational-age birth in Mexico City: the effects of working conditions and antenatal leave. Am J Public Health 86(6):825–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Croteau A, Marcoux S, Brisson C (2007) Working activity in pregnancy, preventive measures, and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol 166:951–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dutch Society for occupational Medicine (NVAB) (2007) Practice guideline pregnancy, postpartum period and work: advice and guidance by the occupational physician. http://nvab.artsennet.nl/Richtlijnen.htm

  8. Emancipatiemonitor (2012) Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) and The Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP). http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/F5DF2565-1721-40A4-BF16-FF7852AAC53D/0/emancipatiemonitor2012.pdf

  9. Escribà-Agüir V, Perez-Hoyos S, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ (2001) Physical load and psychological demand at work during pregnancy and preterm birth. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74:583–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The cochrane collaboration. www.cochrane-handbook.org

  11. Jansen PW, Tiemeier H, Verhulst FC, Burdorf A, Jaddoe VWV, Hofman A, Moll HA, Verburg BO, Steegers EAP, Mackenbach JP, Raat H (2010) Employment status and the risk of pregnancy complications: the Generation R Study. Occup Environ Med 67:387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lawson CC, Whelan EA, Hibert EN, Grajewski B, Spiegelman D, Rich-Edwards JW (2009) Occupational factors and risk of preterm birth in nurses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:51.e1–51.e8

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA-statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PloS Med 6(7):e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luke B, Mamelle N, Keith L, Munoz F, Minogue J, Papiernik E, Johnson TRB (1995) The association between occupational factors and preterm birth: a United States nurses’ study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:849–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mozurkewich EL, Luke B, Avni M, Wolf FM (2000) Working conditions and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 95:623–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. NHS Plus. Royal College of Physicians (2009) Physical and shift work in pregnancy: occupational aspects of management. A national Guideline

  17. Niedhammer I, O’Mahony D, Daly S, Morrison JJ, Kelleher CC (2009) Occupational predictors of pregnancy outcome in Irish working women in the Lifeways cohort. Br J Obstet Gyneacol 16:943–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nurminen T (1995) Female noise exposure, shift work, and reproduction. J Occup Environ Med 37(8):945–950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pompeii LA, Savitz DA, Evenson KR, Rogers B, McMahon M (2005) Physical exertion at work and the risk of preterm delivery and small-for-gestational-age birth. Obstet Gynecol 106:1279–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rothman KL, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Zeitlin J, Lelong N, Papiernik E, Di Renzo GC, Bréart G (2004) Employment, working conditions, and preterm birth: results from the Europop case-control survey. J Epidemiol Commun Health 58:395–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Methodology. http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/index.html

  23. Shirangi A, Fritschi L, Holman DJ (2009) Associations of unscavenged anesthetic gases and long working hours with preterm delivery in female veterinarians. Obstet Gynecol 113:1008–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Snijder CA, Brand T, Jaddoe V, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Steegers EAP, Burdorf A (2012) Physically demanding work, fetal growth and the risk of adverse birth outcomes. The Generation R Study. Occup Environ Med 69:543–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stinson JC, Lee KL (2003) Premature labor and birth: influence of rank and perception of fatigue in active duty military women. Mil Med 168(5):385–389

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tuntiseranee P, Geater A, Chongsuvivatwong V (1998) The effect of heavy maternal workload on fetal growth retardation and preterm delivery: a study among Southern Thai women. J Occup Environ Med 40(11):1013–1021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu X, Ding M, Li B, Christiani DC (1994) Association of rotating shift work with preterm births and low birth weight among never smoking women textile workers in China. Occup Environ Med 51:470–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu JL, Hjollund NH, Olsen J (2004) Shift work, duration of pregnancy, and birth weight: the National Birth Cohort in Denmark. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 191:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. J.H.A.M. Verbeek (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Kuopio, Finland) for his help with the meta-analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. G. J. van Melick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Melick, M.J.G.J., van Beukering, M.D.M., Mol, B.W. et al. Shift work, long working hours and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87, 835–849 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0934-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Preterm birth
  • Shift work
  • Working hours
  • Meta-analysis