Reduction in welding fume and metal exposure of stainless steel welders: an example from the WELDOX study
- 588 Downloads
In a plant where flux-cored arc welding was applied to stainless steel, we investigated changes in airborne and internal metal exposure following improvements of exhaust ventilation and respiratory protection.
Twelve welders were examined at a time in 2008 and in 2011 after improving health protection. Seven welders were enrolled in both surveys. Exposure measurement was performed by personal sampling of respirable welding fume inside the welding helmets during one work shift. Urine and blood samples were taken after the shift. Chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), and manganese (Mn) were determined in air and biological samples.
The geometric mean of respirable particles could be reduced from 4.1 mg/m3 in 2008–0.5 mg/m3 in 2011. Exposure to airborne metal compounds was also strongly reduced (Mn: 399 vs. 6.8 μg/m3; Cr: 187 vs. 6.3 μg/m3; Ni: 76 vs. 2.8 μg/m3), with the most striking reduction inside helmets with purified air supply. Area sampling revealed several concentrations above established or proposed exposure limits. Urinary metal concentrations were also reduced, but to a lesser extent (Cr: 14.8 vs. 4.5 μg/L; Ni: 7.9 vs. 3.1 μg/L). Although biologically regulated, the mean Mn concentration in blood declined from 12.8 to 8.9 μg/L.
This intervention study demonstrated a distinct reduction in the exposure of welders using improved exhaust ventilation and welding helmets with purified air supply in the daily routine. Data from area sampling and biomonitoring indicated that the area background level may add considerably to the internal exposure.
KeywordsExposure reduction Welding fume Biological monitoring
The WELDOX study and this intervention study were financially supported by the German Social Accident Insurance (DGUV). We thank the staff working for the MGU measurement system, especially Rolf Reichel and Frank Fiegehenn, and all welders for having participated. We gratefully acknowledge the field team, especially Hans Gese, Hans Berresheim and Eleonora Gutwinski.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- ACGIH (2011) Threshold limit values for chemical substances and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, Ohio: ISBN 978-1-607260-28-8Google Scholar
- Colli G, Terzi R, Terzi M, Catenacci G (2005) Application of mathematical modelling for assessing the urinary half-times of nickel in stainless steel welders. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 27:427–430Google Scholar
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (2011) List of MAK and BAT values. Report No 47 Weinheim: Wiley-VCHGoogle Scholar
- Gabriel S, Koppisch D, Range D (2010) The MGU—a monitoring system for the collection and documentation of valid workplace exposure data Gefahrstoffe—Reinhaltung der Luft. Air Qual Control 70:43–49Google Scholar
- Hahn J-U (2005) Aufarbeitungsverfahren zur Analytik metallhaltiger Stäube IFA-Arbeitsmappe digital. Available at: http://www.ifa-arbeitsmappedigital.de/6015. Accessed 15 Mar 2013
- Hebisch R, Fricke H–H, Hahn J-U, Lahaniatis M, Maschmeier C-P, Mattenklott M (2005) Sampling and determining aerosols and their chemical compounds. In: Parlar H, Greim H (eds) The MAK Collection for Occupational Health and Safety, Part III Air Monitoring Methods. Wiley, Weinheim VCH 9 ISBN 3-527-31134-3Google Scholar
- Kiefer M, Trout D, Wallace ME (1998) Health Hazard Evaluation Avondale Shipyards, Avondale Louisiana. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports/pdfs/1997-0260-2716.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2013
- Lehnert M, Pesch B, Lotz A, Pelzer J, Kendzia B, Gawrych K, Heinze E, Van Gelder R, Punkenburg E, Weiss T, Mattenklott M, Hahn J-U, Möhlmann C, Berges M, Hartwig A, Brüning T, the WELDOX Study Group (2012) Exposure to inhalable, respirable, and ultrafine particles in welding fume. Ann Occup Hyg 56:557–567Google Scholar
- Moehlmann C (2006) Simultane personenbezogene Probenahme der E- und A-Fraktionen in Schweißrauchen Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung (IFA). Available at: http://www.ifa-arbeitsmappedigital.de/3025. Accessed 15 Mar 2013
- OSHA (2006) Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium final rule. Fed Regist 71:10099–10385Google Scholar
- Pesch B, Weiss T, Kendzia B, Henry J, Lehnert M, Spickenheuer A, Heinze E, Kaefferlein H, Van Gelder R, Berges M, Hahn JU, Mattenklott M, Punkenburg E, Hartwig A, Bruening T (2012) Levels and predictors of airborne and internal exposure to manganese and iron among welders. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 22:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pocock D, Saunders JC, Carter G (2009) Effective control of gas shielded arc welding fume. Research Report No 683 Norwich, UK: health and safety executive available at: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/rr683.htm. Accessed 15 Mar 2013
- Tossavainen A, Nurminen M, Mutanen P, Tola S (1980) Application of mathematical modelling for assessing the biological halftimes of chromium and nickel in field studies. Br J Ind Med 37(3):285–291Google Scholar
- Weiss T, Pesch B, Lotz A, Gutwinski E, Van Gelder R, Punkenburg E, Kendzia B, Gawrych K, Lehnert M, Heinze E, Hartwig A, Käfferlein HU, Hahn JU, Brüning T, the WELDOX Group (2013) Levels and predictors of airborne and internal exposure to chromium and nickel among welders—results of the WELDOX study. Int J Hyg Environ Health 216(2):175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar