Sampling of urinary cadmium: differences between 24-h urine and overnight spot urine sampling, and impact of adjustment for dilution

Abstract

Purpose

Urinary cadmium (U-Cd) sampling can be done either by 24-h urine or spot urine sampling, and adjustment for dilution is usually needed. The choice of sampling period and adjustment technique could, however, potentially induce bias. The aim of the study was to compare 24-h urine and spot urine sampling and two dilution adjustment techniques, when assessing U-Cd.

Methods

Separate 24-h urine (U24) and timed overnight spot urine (UON) samples were collected from 152 healthy kidney donors. U-Cd, creatinine concentration (U-Crea) and specific gravity (SG) were analysed. Differences between U24 and UON samples were tested using paired t test, and the effect of urinary flow rate (UF) was assessed by linear regression.

Results

The cadmium excretion rate (U-Cd/h) was lower in the UON than in U24 samples (mean 0.017 μg/h vs. 0.021 μg/h; p < 0.001). This decrease was found also for the creatinine-adjusted U-Cd (U-CdCrea) (mean 0.36 μg/gC and 0.41 μg/gC; p < 0.001). For U-Cd adjusted for specific gravity (U-CdSG), the difference was reversed, but not statistically significant. The creatinine excretion rate (U-Crea/h) decreased at low UF, especially in the UON.

Conclusions

Since U-Cd/h was lower in UON than in U24 samples, the former will underestimate the true Cd excretion. This was seen for U-CdCrea but not for U-CdSG. However, it may be an advantage that the U-CdSG is similar, irrespective of sampling strategy. At low UF, U-CdCrea will be biased upwards. Whether U24 or UON samples adjusted for U-Crea or SG best reflect kidney-Cd is still unknown.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Barany E, Bergdahl I, Schütz A, Skerfving S, Oskarsson A (1997) Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for direct multi-element analysis of diluted human blood and serum. J Anal At Spectrom 12:1005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barregard L, Fabricius-Lagging E, Lundh T, Molne J, Wallin M, Olausson M, Modigh C, Sallsten G (2010) Cadmium, mercury, and lead in kidney cortex of living kidney donors: impact of different exposure sources. Environ Res 110:47–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berlin A, Alessio L, Sesana G, Dell’orto A, Ghezzi I (1985) Problems concerning the usefulness of adjustment of urinary cadmium for creatinine and specific gravity. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 55:107–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carrieri M, Trevisan A, Bartolucci GB (2001) Adjustment to concentration-dilution of spot urine samples: correlation between specific gravity and creatinine. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74:63–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. EFSA (2009) Cadmium in food–scientific opinion of panel on contaminants in the food chain. EFSA J 980:1–139

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elkins HB, Pagnotto LD, Smith HL (1974) Concentration adjustments in urinalysis. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 35:559–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenberg GN, Levine RJ (1989) Urinary creatinine excretion is not stable: a new method for assessing urinary toxic substance concentrations. J Occup Med 31:832–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarup L, Berglund M, Elinder CG, Nordberg G, Vahter M (1998) Health effects of cadmium exposure–a review of the literature and a risk estimate. Scand J Work Environ Health 24(Suppl 1):1–51

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moriguchi J, Ezaki T, Tsukahara T, Fukui Y, Ukai H, Okamoto S, Shimbo S, Sakurai H, Ikeda M (2005) Decreases in urine specific gravity and urinary creatinine in elderly women. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78:438–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearson MA, Lu C, Schmotzer BJ, Waller LA, Riederer AM (2009) Evaluation of physiological measures for correcting variation in urinary output: implications for assessing environmental chemical exposure in children. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 19:336–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sata F, Araki S, Yokoyama K, Murata K (1995) Adjustment of creatinine-adjusted values in urine to urinary flow rate: a study of eleven heavy metals and organic substances. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 68:64–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Suwazono Y, Akesson A, Alfven T, Jarup L, Vahter M (2005) Creatinine versus specific gravity-adjusted urinary cadmium concentrations. Biomarkers 10:117–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Trachtenberg F, Barregard L, Mckinlay S (2010) The influence of urinary flow rate on mercury excretion in children. J Trace Elem Med Biol 24:31–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trevisan A, Nicoletto G, Maso S, Grandesso G, Odynets A, Secondin L (1994) Biological monitoring of cadmium exposure: reliability of spot urine samples. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65:373–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yokoyama K, Araki S, Sato H, Aono H (2000) Circadian rhythms of seven heavy metals in plasma, erythrocytes and urine in men: observation in metal workers. Ind Health 38:205–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magnus Akerstrom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akerstrom, M., Lundh, T., Barregard, L. et al. Sampling of urinary cadmium: differences between 24-h urine and overnight spot urine sampling, and impact of adjustment for dilution. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 85, 189–196 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0658-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Urinary cadmium
  • Creatinine
  • Specific gravity
  • 24-h urine
  • Spot urine