The response of the human circulatory system to an acute 200-μT, 60-Hz magnetic field exposure
- 148 Downloads
Recent research by the authors on the effects of extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic field (MF) exposure on human heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and skin blood perfusion found no cardiovascular effects of exposure to an 1,800-μT, 60-Hz MF. Research from our group using rats, however, has suggested a microcirculatory response to a 200-μT, 60-Hz MF exposure. The present pilot study investigated the effects of 1 h of exposure to a 200-μT, 60-Hz MF on the human circulation. Microcirculation (as skin blood perfusion) and HR were measured using laser Doppler flowmetry. Mean arterial pressure was monitored with a non-invasive blood pressure system.
Ten volunteers were recruited to partake in a counterbalanced, single-blinded study consisting of two testing sessions (real and sham exposure) administered on separate days. Each session included four consecutive measurement periods separated by rest, allowing assessment of cumulative and residual MF effects.
A within-subjects analysis of variance did not reveal session by time period interactions for any of the parameters which would have been suggestive of a MF effect (p > 0.05). Perfusion, HR, and skin surface temperature decreased over the course of the experiment (p < 0.05).
The MF used in this experiment did not affect perfusion, HR, or mean arterial pressure. Decreasing perfusion and HR trends over time were similar to our previous results and appear to be associated with a combination of inactivity (resulting in decreasing body temperatures) and reduced physiological arousal.
KeywordsMagnetic field 60 Hz Microcirculation Heart rate Blood pressure
The authors wish to extend thanks to Lynn Keenliside for his technical expertise and assistance with this project.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Funding for this project was supplied by Hydro Québec—TransEnergié and Électricité de France—Réseau de Transport d’Électricité. This study was also funded in part by Canadian Institutes of Health Research grants (FRN 85217 and MOP 43874), the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (11358) and the Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund (MAR-01-0936).
- Akata T, Kanna T, Yoshino J, Higashi M, Fukui K, Takahashi S (2004) Reliability of fingertip skin-surface temperature and its related thermal measures as indices of peripheral perfusion in the clinical setting of the operating theatre. Anaesth Intensive Care 32(4):519–529Google Scholar
- Dekker JM, Schouten EG, Klootwijk P, Pool J, Swenne CA, Kromhout D (1997) Heart rate variability from short electrocardiographic recordings predicts mortality from all causes in middle-aged and elderly men. Am J Epidemiol 145:899–908Google Scholar
- Hensel JM, Bohnert R, Tyml K, Prato FS, Thomas AW (2003) Effects of specific pulsed and oscillating (30 Hz, 60 Hz) magnetic fields on acetylcholine-induced vasodilation in rats. Poster session presented at: BEMS 25th Annual Meeting. 2003 Jun 22–27; Maui, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
- Kenny WL, Johnson JM (1992) Control of skin blood flow during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24(3):303–312Google Scholar
- Liao D, Cai J, Rosamond WD, Bames RW, Hutchinson RG, Whitsel EA, Rautaharju P, Heiss G (1997) Cardiac autonomic function and incident coronary heart disease: a population based case-cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 145:696–706Google Scholar
- Moses ZB, Luecken LJ, Eason JC (2007) Measuring task-related changes in heart rate variability. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007:644–647Google Scholar
- Savitz DA, Liao D, Sastre A, Kleckner RC, Kavet R (1999) Magnetic field exposure and cardiovascular disease mortality among electric utility workers. Am J Epidemiol 149:135–142Google Scholar
- Tsuji H, Larson MG, Venditti FJ, Manders ES, Evans JC, Feldman CL, Levy D (1996) Impact of reduced heart rate variability on risk for cardiac events. The Framingham heart study. Circulation 94(11):2850–2855Google Scholar
- Wertheimer N, Leeper E (1979) Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol 109(3):273–284Google Scholar