The influence of individual and contextual psychosocial work factors on the perception of the indoor environment at work: a multilevel analysis
The aims of this study was to investigate the role of the psychosocial work environment—at the individual level as well as the workplace level—in explaining the variability in the employees’ perception of the indoor environment.
The perception of the indoor environment was surveyed by questionnaires among 3,281 employees in 39 randomly selected workplaces. Multilevel logistic regression analyses included individual-level and workplace-level covariates to examine the effect of context. Associations between psychosocial risk factors at the workplace level and the employees’ perception of the indoor environment was calculated as the interval odds ratios while between-workplace variations were quantified by intraclass correlations and median odds ratios.
We found moderate differences between the workplaces in the perception of the indoor environment, but large differences between individuals in the same building indicating that some occupants of a building do perceive problems in the indoor environment even in the absence of a general indoor air problem in the workplace. The type of organisation accounted for some of the variation in perceived indoor environment. Psychosocial work environment factors at the individual level, but not at the workplace-level, were associated with the individual perception of the indoor environment. In addition, an increased tendency to report symptoms was strongly associated with complaints about the indoor environment suggesting bias due to a tendency to “over-report”.
In studies investigating “sick buildings” contextual factors may be important. Multilevel analyses should be used in future research within workplaces where clustering could be expected.
KeywordsSick building Indoor environment Perception Job satisfaction Multilevel analysis
- Andersson K (1998) Epidemiological approach to indoor air problems. Indoor Air Suppl 4: 32–39Google Scholar
- Brauer C, Mikkelsen S, Skov P (2000) Reliability and validity of a new questionnaire for investigation of symptoms related to “The Sick Building Syndrome” and perceived Indoor Air Quality [in Danish, Report, own print]. Department of Occupational Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark, 1–73Google Scholar
- Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurements 37–46Google Scholar
- Johansson SG, Hourihane JO, Bousquet J, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, Dreborg S, Haahtela T, Kowalski ML, Mygind N, Ring J, van Cauwenberge P, Hage-Hamsten M, Wuthrich B (2001) A revised nomenclature for allergy. An EAACI position statement from the EAACI nomenclature task force. Allergy 56:813–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
- Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, Beckman A, Johnell K, Hjerpe P, Rastam L, Larsen K (2006) A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Health 60:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson NA, Kaufman JD, Burt J, Karr C (1995) Health symptoms and the work environment in four nonproblem United States office buildings. Scand J Work Environ Health 21:51–59Google Scholar
- Reijula K, Sundman-Digert C (2004) Assessment of indoor air problems at work with a questionnaire. Occup Environ Med 61:33–38Google Scholar
- Skov P, Valbjorn O, Pedersen BV (1989) Influence of personal characteristics, job-related factors and psychosocial factors on the sick building syndrome. Danish Indoor Climate Study Group. Scand J Work Environ Health 15:286–295Google Scholar
- Snijders TAB, Bosker RO (1999) Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. SAGE Publications Ltd, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar