Nasal blown secretion evaluation in specific occupational nasal challenges
To investigate the usefulness of nasal blown secretion evaluation during specific nasal provocation test (sNPT) in diagnosing occupational rhinitis (OR).
To validate the method, nasal blown secretions from 103 healthy subjects and 30 allergic rhinitis patients were analyzed. Furthermore, we analyzed nasal blown secretions, collected before and after sNPT, of 29 subjects with work-related rhinitis symptoms (WRRS) who underwent the diagnostic pathway for OR. Rhinoscopy and nasal symptom score were used to define a positive sNPT.
A total of 89.6% WRRS subjects provided suitable nasal secretions. Eosinophils significantly increased after positive sNPTs compared to negative ones (P = 0.006). Four percent and/or 1 × 104 eosinophils/ml was the cut-off for a significant post-sNPT eosinophil increase. A total of 4/13 (33%) WRRS subjects with negative sNPT, assessed by rhinoscopy and nasal symptom score, presented a significant post-sNPT nasal eosinophil increase, and were identified as possible OR.
Eosinophil evaluation in nasal blown secretions is an important tool in monitoring the response to occupational specific nasal challenges.
KeywordsEosinophils Nasal provocation test Nasal blown secretions Occupational rhinitis Reference values
Specific nasal provocation test/challenge
Work-related rhinitis symptoms
High molecular weight
Low molecular weight
- Efthimiadis A, Spanevello A, Hamid Q et al (2002) Methods of sputum processing for cell counts, immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridisation. Eur Respir J Suppl 37:19s–23sGoogle Scholar
- Hytönen M, Sala E (1996) Nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational allergic rhinitis. Rhinology 34:86–90Google Scholar
- Krakowiak A, Walusiak J, Krawczyk P et al (2008) IL-18 levels in nasal lavage after inhalatory challenge test with flour in bakers diagnosed with occupational asthma. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 9:1–8Google Scholar
- Moscato G, Vandenplas O, Van Wijk R et al (2009) EAACI Position paper on occupational rhinitis. Respir Res 3:10–16Google Scholar
- Rajakulasingam K (2003) Nasal provocation testing. In: Adkinson NF Jr, Yunginger JW, Busse WW, Bochner BS, Holgate ST, Simons FER (eds) Middleton’s allergy principles and practice. Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 644–655Google Scholar
- Roquet A, Ihre E, van-Hage Hamsten M et al (1996) Allergen-induced inflammation in the nose: a comparison of acute and repeated low-dose allergen exposure. Allergy 51:42–48Google Scholar
- Vandenplas O, Cartier A, Malo JL (2006) Occupational challenge test. In: Bernstein IL, Chan-Yeung M, Malo JL, Bernstein DI (eds) Asthma in the workplace. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 227–252Google Scholar
- Walusiak J, Wiszniewska M, Krawczyk-Adamus P et al (2004) Occupational allergy to wheat flour. Nasal response to specific inhalative challenge in asthma and rhinitis versus isolated rhinitis: a comparative study. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 17:433–440Google Scholar