Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impairing effects of noise in high and low noise sensitive persons working on different mental tasks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

There is no information of mental strain in noise sensitive persons working under moderate levels of noise. The aim of the study was to determine relevant dimensions of impairing effects differentiating between noise sensitive and insensitive persons.

Methods

56 participants (27 men, 29 women; 18–31 years old) were classified into 28 low and 28 high noise sensitive persons. They worked either on a grammatical reasoning task (GRT) or a mental arithmetic task (MPT) under realistic road traffic scenarios [LAeq 55 dB(A)]. Afterwards they rated their annoyance and subjective mental strain.

Results

A multivariate analysis of variance provided significant effects for the individual noise sensitivity (P < 0.01) and the kind of task being performed (P < 0.01). To determine to what extent the rating scales lead to a differentiation of the four groups, a 2-factorial discriminant analysis was carried out subsequently. Results showed, that psycho-physiological effort and emotional strain differentiated best between the noise sensitivity groups and psycho physiological effort and focus on tasks (attention) separated the tasks.

Conclusion

Noise sensitive persons are more distracted by noise than insensitive persons. Furthermore the results suggest that noise sensitive subjects do not only evaluate a noisy situation as more annoying but experience higher levels of strain than insensitive persons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann H (2006) Basics of medical biometrics. [Grundlagen der medizinischen Biometrie.]. Epsilon-Verlag, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • AGARD (1989) Human performance assessment methods. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Babisch W (2004) Health aspects of extra-aural noise research. Noise Health 6(22):69–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley AD (1968) A three minute reasoning test based on grammatical transformation. Psychon Sci 10(10):341–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Belojevic G, Öhrström E, Rylander R (1992) Effects of noise on mental performance with regard to subjective noise sensitivity. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 64:293–301. doi:10.1007/BF00378288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belojevic G, Slepcevic V, Jakovljevic B (1999) Individual differences in mental processing under quiet and noisy laboratory conditions. Facta Univ 1(4):45–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Belojevic G, Jakovljevic B, Slepcevic V (2003) Noise and mental performance: personality attributes and noise sensitivity. Noise Health 6(21):77–89

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borsky PN (1972) Sonic boom exposure effects II.4: annoyance reactions. J Sound Vib 20:527–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortz J (2005) Statistics for human and social scientists. [Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler.]. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortz J, Liehnert G, Boehnke K (2008) Non-parametric methods in biostatistics. [Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik.]. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley WW, Lohnes PR (1971) Multivariate data analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornic S, Laaksonen T, Ekehammar B (1990) Noise sensitivity: general self-reports vs. noise effect in laboratory situations. Report No. 716. Department of Psychology, University Stockholm, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudek B, Marszal-Wisniewska M, Merecz-Kot D et al (1991) Effects of noise on cognitive processes of individuals in a laboratory experiment. Pol J Occup Med Environ Health 4(3):269–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation (2007) EUROCONTROL medium-term forecast: IFR flight movements 2007–2013. EATMP Infocentre, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields JM, de Jong RG, Gjestland T et al (2001) Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation. In community response to noise team of ICBEN (ed). J Sound Vib 242:641–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guski R, Felscher-Suhr U, Schuemer R (1999) The concept of noise annoyance: how international experts see it. J Sound Vib 223:513–527. doi:10.1006/jsvi.1998.2173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker W, Richter P (1984) Mental strain: mental fatigue, monotony, satiation and stress. [Psychische Fehlbeanspruchung. Psychische Ermüdung, Monotonie, Sättigung und Streß.]. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 10075-1:1991, Ergonomic principles related to mental work-load—general terms and definitions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  • ISO 10075-3: 2004, Ergonomic principles related to mental workload—part 3: principles and requirements concerning methods for measuring and assessing mental workload. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  • ISO/TS 15666: 2003, Acoustics—assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  • Jelínková Z, Picek M, Hynčica V (1989) Psychophysiological aspects of noise influence. Int J Psychophysiol 7(2–4):249–250. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(89)90190-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Job RFS (1996) The influence of subjective reactions to noise on health effects of the noise. Environ Int 22(1):93–104. doi:10.1016/0160-4120(95)00107-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Job RFS (1999) Noise sensitivity as a factor influencing human reactions to noise. Noise Health 3:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1992) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Joiko K, Schmauder M, Wolff G (2008) Mental stress and strain in the job: identification—design. [Psychische Belastung und Beanspruchung im Berufsleben: Erkennen—Gestalten.] Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund

  • Kjellberg A, Sköldström B (1991) Noise annoyance during the performance of different nonauditory tasks. Percept Mot Skills 73:39–49. doi:10.2466/PMS.73.4.39-49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg A, Landström U, Tesarz M, Söderberg L, Akerlund E (1996) The effects of nonphysical noise characteristics, ongoing task and noise sensitivity on annoyance and distraction due to noise at work. J Environ Psychol 16:123–136. doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljungberg JK, Neely G (2007) Stress, subjective experience and cognitive performance during exposure to noise and vibration. J Environ Psychol 27:44–54. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann HU, Ratzenberger R, Schubert M et al (2001) Traffic forecast 2015 for the Bundesverkehrswegeplanung. [Verkehrsprognose 2015 für die Bundesverkehrswegeplanung.]. Federal Ministry of Transport, Building, and Urban Affairs, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Miedema HME, Vos H (2003) Noise sensitivity and reactions to noise and other environmental conditions. J Acoust Soc Am 113:1492–1504. doi:10.1121/1.1547437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Öhrström E, Björkman M, Rylander R (1988) Noise annoyance with regard to neurophysiological sensitivity, subjective noise sensitivity and personality variables. Psychol Med 18(3):605–613

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plath HE, Richter P (1984) Fatigue, monotony, satiation, stress (BMS II) method for the scaled assessment of perceived strain. [Ermüdung, Monotonie, Sättigung, Stress (BMS II). Verfahren zur skalierten Erfassung erlebter Beanspruchungsfolgen.] Psychodiagnostisches Zentrum, Berlin

  • Schlegel RE, Gilliland K (1990) Evaluation of the criterion task set. Part 1. CTS performance and SWAT data—baseline conditions. Wright-Patterson Airforce Base, Dayton

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütte M, Marks A, Wenning E, Griefahn B (2007a) The development of the noise sensitivity questionnaire. Noise Health 9(34):15–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schütte M, Sandrock S, Griefahn B (2007b) Factorial validity of the noise sensitivity questionnaire. Noise Health 9(37):96–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shingledecker CA (1984) A task battery for applied human performance assessment research. Wright-Patterson Airforce Base, Dayton

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1990) Noise, performance efficiency and safety. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 62:1–5. doi:10.1007/BF00397841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stansfeld SA (1992) Noise, noise sensitivity and psychological studies, psychological medicine—monograph supplement, vol 22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education, Inc, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kamp I, Job RFS, Hatfield J et al (2004) The role of noise sensitivity in the noise–response relation: a comparison of three international airport studies. J Acoust Soc Am 116:3471–3479. doi:10.1121/1.1810291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VDI guideline 2058-3 (1999) Rating of noise at the workplace with respect to different tasks. [Beurteilung von Lärm am Arbeitsplatz unter Berücksichtigung unterschiedlicher Tätigkeiten.] Beuth, Berlin

  • Weinstein N (1978) Individual differences in reactions to noise: a longitudinal study in a college dormitory. J Appl Psychol 63(4):458–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell A (1996) Perfomance tests. Environ Health Perspect 104(Suppl 2):247–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wierwille WW, Eggemeier FT (1993) Recommendations for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Hum Factors 35:263–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer K, Ellermeier W (1999) Psychometric properties of four measures of noise sensitivity: a comparison. J Environ Psychol 19:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The study was performed within the framework of the EU-funded IP SILENCE (Contract 516288).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft, Uerdinger Str. 56 , 40474, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Stephan Sandrock

  2. Institut für Arbeitsphysiologie an der Universität Dortmund, Ardeystraße 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany

    Martin Schütte & Barbara Griefahn

Authors
  1. Stephan Sandrock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Schütte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barbara Griefahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Sandrock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandrock, S., Schütte, M. & Griefahn, B. Impairing effects of noise in high and low noise sensitive persons working on different mental tasks. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82, 779–785 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0379-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0379-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation