Abstract
Purpose
The objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy of experimental manipulations of psychosocial exposures and to evaluate the sensitivity of a psychosocial questionnaire by determining the factors perceived.
Methods
A 50-item questionnaire was developed from the job content questionnaire (JCQ) and the quality of worklife survey (QWL). The experiment involved simulated work at different physical and psychosocial levels. Forty-eight participants were exposed to two levels of one psychosocial manipulation (job control, job demands, social support, or time pressure).
Results
Significantly different questionnaire responses supported the effectiveness of psychosocial manipulations. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five factors: skill discretion and decision authority, stress level and supervisor support, physical demands, quality of coworker support, and decision-making support.
Conclusions
These results suggest that psychosocial factors can be manipulated experimentally, and that questionnaires can distinguish perceptions of these factors. These questionnaires may be used to assess perceptions of psychosocial factors in experimental settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ariëns GAM, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Bouter LM, van der Wal G (2001) Psychosocial risk factors for neck pain: a systematic review. Am J Ind Med 39:180–193. doi :10.1002/1097-0274(200102)39:2≤180::AID-AJIM1005≥3.0.CO;2-#
Bültmann U, Kant IJ, Schröer CAP, Kasl SV (2002) The relationship between psychosocial work characteristics and fatigue and psychological distress. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:259–266. doi:10.1007/s00420-001-0294-0
Gillen M, Baltz D, Gassel M, Kirsch L, Vaccaro D (2002) Perceived safety climate, job demands, and coworker support among union and nonunion injured construction workers. J Safety Res 33:33–51. doi:10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00002-6
Holte KA, Westgaard RH (2002) Further studies of shoulder and neck pain and exposures in customer service work with low biomechanical demands. Ergonomics 45:887–909. doi:10.1080/0014013021000034867
Hughes LE (2007) Development of a comprehensive measurement method for assessing WMSD Risk in occupational settings. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04192007-215311/
Hurrell JJ Jr, Nelson DL, Simmons BL (1998) Measuring job stressors and strains: where we have been, where we are, and where we need to go. J Occup Health Psychol 3:368–389. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.368
Johnson DE (1998) Applied multivariate methods for data analysts. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove
Karasek RA (1985) Job content questionnaire and user’s guide. University of Massachusetts Lowell, Department of Work Environment, Lowell
Karasek RA, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers PM (1998) The job content questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 3:322–355. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.322
Landsbergis PA, Theorell T, Schwartz JE, Greiner BA, Krause N (2000) Measurement of psychosocial workplace exposure variables. Occup Med 15:163–188
Leyman ELC, Mirka GA, Kaber DB, Sommerich CM (2004) Cervicobrachial muscle response to cognitive load in a dual-task scenario. Ergonomics 47:625–645. doi:10.1080/00140130310001629766
Lundberg U, Forsman M, Zachau G, Eklöf M, Palmerud G, Melin B et al (2002) Effects of experimentally induced mental and physical stress on motor unit recruitment in the trapezius muscle. Work Stress 16:166–178. doi:10.1080/02678370210136699
MacDonald LA, Karasek RA, Punnett L, Scharf T (2001) Covariation between workplace physical and psychosocial stressors: evidence and implications for occupational health research and prevention. Ergonomics 44:696–718. doi:10.1080/00140130110041121
Marras WS, Davis KG, Heaney CA, Maronitis AB, Allread WG (2000) The influence of psychosocial stress, gender, and personality on mechanical loading of the lumbar spine. Spine 25:3045–3054. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012010-00012
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2002) Quality of worklife questionnaire. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/stress/qwlquest.html. Cited March 25, 2007
Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York
Punnett L, Gold J, Katz JN, Gore R, Wegman DH (2004) Ergonomic stressors and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders in automobile manufacturing: a one year follow up study. Occup Environ Med 61:668–674. doi:10.1136/oem.2003.008979
Searle BJ, Bright JEH, Bochner S (1999) Testing the 3-factor model of occupational stress: the impact of demands, control and social support on a mail sorting task. Work Stress 13:268–279. doi:10.1080/026783799296066
Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, Boston
Sood D, Nussbaum MA, Hager K (2007) Fatigue during prolonged intermittent overhead work: reliability of measures and effects of working heights. Ergonomics 50:497–513. doi:10.1080/00140130601133800
Vagg PR, Spielberger CD (1998) Occupational stress: measuring job pressure and organizational support in the workplace. J Occup Health Psychol 3:294–305. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.294
Wahlström J, Hagberg M, Toomingas A, Wigaeus Tornqvist E (2004) Perceived muscular tension, job strain, physical exposure, and associations with neck pain among VDU users; a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 61:523–528. doi:10.1136/oem.2003.009563
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ikuma, L.H., Babski-Reeves, K. & Nussbaum, M.A. Experimental manipulation of psychosocial exposure and questionnaire sensitivity in a simulated manufacturing setting. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82, 735–746 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0364-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0364-7