The SOBANE risk management strategy and the Déparis method for the participatory screening of the risks

Documents of International Meetings and Activities

Abstract

Introduction

The first section of the document describes a risk-prevention strategy, called SOBANE, in four levels: screening, observation, analysis and expertise. The aim is to make risk prevention faster, more cost effective, and more effective in coordinating the contributions of the workers themselves, their management, the internal and external occupational health (OH) practitioners and the experts. These four levels are: screening, where the risk factors are detected by the workers and their management, and obvious solutions are implemented; observation, where the remaining problems are studied in more detail, one by one, and the reasons and the solutions are discussed in detail; analysis, where, when necessary, an OH practitioner is called upon to carry out appropriate measurements to develop specific solutions; expertise, where, in very sophisticated and rare cases, the assistance of an expert is called upon to solve a particular problem.

Method

The method for the participatory screening of the risks (in French: Dépistage Participatif des Risques), Déparis, is proposed for the first level screening of the SOBANE strategy. The work situation is systematically reviewed and all the aspects conditioning the easiness, the effectiveness and the satisfaction at work are discussed, in search of practical prevention measures. The points to be studied more in detail at level 2, observation, are identified. The method is carried out during a meeting of key workers and technical staff.

Conclusion

The method proves to be simple, sparing in time and means and playing a significant role in the development of a dynamic plan of risk management and of a culture of dialogue in the company.

Keywords

Prevention strategy Risk analysis Screening method 

References

  1. Anon (2002) Control banding workshop. A joint workshop held in November 2002 with BIOH and IOHA supported by HSE, WHO and ILO, http://www.bohs.org/mod.php?mod=fileman&op=view_cat&id=14
  2. BS 8800 (1996) Guide to occupational health and safety management systems. BSIGoogle Scholar
  3. European Communities (1989) Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work, Official Journal L 183, 29/06/1989 pp 0001–0008Google Scholar
  4. Goelzer BIF (1996) Yant Award Lecture: “The harmonized development of occupational hygiene—a need in developing countries”, presented on 21 May 1996, at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. International Labour Office (2001) Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems, ILO-OSH 2001, Geneva, p 40Google Scholar
  6. International Standard ISO 7933 (1991) Hot environments—analytical determination and interpretation of thermal stress using calculation of required sweat rates. International Standard Organisation, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  7. Malchaire J (2000). Strategy for prevention and control of the risk due to noise. Occup Environ Med 57:361–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Malchaire J, Piette A (1997) A comprehensive strategy for the assessment of noise exposure and risk of hearing impairment. Ann Occup Hyg 41:467–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Malchaire J, Piette A (2001) Stratégie de prévention des risques dus à l’utilisation de machines vibrantes. Recueil des résumés du 9ème congrès international sur les vibrations mains-bras, 5–8 June 2001, Nancy, FranceGoogle Scholar
  10. Malchaire J, Piette A (2002) Co-ordinated strategy of prevention and control of the biomechanical factors associated with the risk of musculoskeletal disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:459–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Malchaire J, Piette A, Cock N (1998a) Stratégie d’évaluation et de prévention des risques liés au bruit. Commissariat général à la Promotion du Travail, Ministère de l’Emploi et du TravailGoogle Scholar
  12. Malchaire J, Piette A, Cock N (1998b) Stratégie d’évaluation et de prévention des risques liés aux ambiances thermiques. Commissariat général à la Promotion du Travail, Ministère de l’Emploi et du TravailGoogle Scholar
  13. Malchaire J, Piette A, Cock N (1998c) Stratégie d’évaluation et de prévention des risques liés à l’éclairage. Commissariat général à la Promotion du Travail, Ministère de l’Emploi et du TravailGoogle Scholar
  14. Malchaire J, Piette A, Cock N (1998d) Stratégie d’évaluation et de prévention des risques liés aux vibrations corps total. Commissariat général à la Promotion du Travail, Ministère de l’Emploi et du TravailGoogle Scholar
  15. Malchaire J, Piette A, Cock N (1998e) Stratégie d’évaluation et de prévention des risques liés aux vibrations mains-bras. Commissariat général à la Promotion du Travail, Ministère de l’Emploi et du TravailGoogle Scholar
  16. Malchaire J, Gebhardt HJ, Piette A (1999) Strategy for evaluation and prevention of risk due to work in thermal environments. Ann Occup Hyg 43:367–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Malchaire J, Piette A, Cock N (2002) Stratégie d’évaluation et de prévention des risques liés aux troubles musculosquelettiques du dos et des membres supérieurs. Ministère fédéral de l’Emploi et du TravailGoogle Scholar
  18. Occhipinti E, (1998) OCRA: a concise index for the assessment of exposure to repetitive movements of the upper limbs. Ergonomics 41:1290–1311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Oldershaw P (2002) Control banding—an overview. Joint workshop held in November 2002 with BIOH and IOHA supported by HSE, WHO and ILO, http://www.bohs.org/mod.php?mod=fileman&op=view_cat&id=14
  20. Radwin RG, Lin ML, Yen TY (1994) Exposure assessment of biomechanical stress in repetitive manual work using frequency-weighted filters. Ergonomics 37:1984–1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rappaport SM (1991) Assessment of long-term exposures to toxic substances in air. Ann Occup Hyg 35:61–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wells R, Moore A, Potvin J, Norman R (1994) Assessment of risk factors for development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (RSI). Appl Ergon 25:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Occupational Hygiene and Work Physiology UnitUniversité catholique de LouvainBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations