Abstract
Aims
Inter-observer repeatability, validity and responsiveness to change were determined for an expert assessment method for video-display unit (VDU) workstation ergonomics. The aim was to determine to what extent the expert assessment of ergonomics is related to the technical measurements, tidiness and space, work chair ergonomics and responds to changes in these characteristics.
Methods
Technical measurements and video-recordings before and 2 months after an ergonomic intervention were made for 109 VDU office workstations. Two experts in ergonomics analysed and rated the ergonomics of the workstations. A researcher analysed tidiness and available space. A physiotherapist classified the work chairs used according to their ergonomic properties.
Results
The intra-class correlation coefficient between the workstation ergonomic ratings of the two experts was 0.74 at the baseline and 0.81 at the follow-up. Workstation tidiness and space, and work chair ergonomics, had a strong effect on the assessments of both experts. For both experts a change in the locations of the mouse, the screen and the keyboard and values of tidiness and space and work chair ergonomics during the intervention showed a significant association with the ratings.
Conclusion
The assessment method studied can be utilized by an expert in a repeatable manner both in cross-sectional and in longitudinal settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Aarås A, Ro O (1997) Workload when using a mouse as an input device. Int J Hum Comput Interact 9:105–118
Aarås A, Fostervold KI, Ro O, Thoresen M, Larsen S (1997) Postural load during VDU work: a comparison between various work postures. Ergonomics 40:1255–1268
Burgess-Limerick RP, Plooy A, Fraser K, Ankrum DR (1999) The influence of computer monitor height on head and neck posture. Int J Ind Ergon 23:171–179
Gerr F, Marcus M, Ortiz D, White B, Jones W, Cohen S, Gentry E, Edwards A, Bauer E (2000) Computer users’ postures and associations with workstation characteristics. AIHAJ 61:223–230
Grandjean E, Hunting W, Pidermann M (1983) VDT workstation design: preferred settings and their effects. Hum Factors 25:161–175
Hedge AM, Morimoto S, McCrobie D (1999) Effects of keyboard tray geometry on upper body posture and comfort. Ergonomics 42:1333–1349
ISO 9241:1998 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals, part 2: guidance of task requirements
ISO 9241:1998 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals, part 11: guidance of usability
Karlqvist L (1997) Assessment of physical work load at visual display unit workstations: ergonomic applications and gender aspects. Arbete och hälsa 9:97
Karlqvist L, Hagberg M, Selin K (1994) Variation in upper limb posture and movement during word processing with and without mouse use. Ergonomics 37:1261–1267
Ketola R, Toivonen R, Häkkänen M, Luukkonen R, Takala EP, Viikari-Juntura E (2002) Effects of ergonomic intervention in work with video display units. Scand J Work Environ Health 28:18–24
Korhonen T, Ketola R, Toivonen R, Luukkonen R, Häkkänen M, Viikari-Juntura E (2003) Work related and individual predictors for incident neck pain among office employees working with video display units. Occup Environ Med 60:1–8
Lintula M, Nevala-Puranen N, Louhevaara V (2001) Effects of Ergorest arm supports on muscle strain and wrist positions during the use of the mouse and keyboard in work with visual display units: a work site intervention. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 7:103–116
Marcus M, Gerr F (1996) Upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms among female office workers: associations with video display terminal use and occupational psychosocial stressors. Am J Ind Med 29:161–170
Marklin RW, Simoneau GC (2001) Effect of setup configurations of split computer keyboards on wrist angle. Phys Ther 81:1038–1048
Moffet H, Hagberg M, Hansson-Risberg E, Karlqvist L (2002) Influence of laptop computer design and working position on physical exposure variables. Clin Biomech 17:368–375
Punnett L, Bergqvist U (1997) Visual display unit work and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Arbete och hälsa 16:1–156
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to Sanna Laaksonlaita and Ritva Kukkonen, Department of Physiology, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, for rating tidiness and space and ergonomics of the chair. This study was financially supported by the Finnish Environmental Fund and the European Commission (project MIRTH—G1RD-CT-2001-00574).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ketola, R., Toivonen, R., Luukkonen, R. et al. Expert assessment of physical ergonomics at video-display unit workstations: repeatability, validity and responsiveness to changes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 77, 437–442 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-004-0519-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-004-0519-0