Abstract
Hazardous substances that penetrate the skin barrier may induce dermal irritation, inflammation or sensitisation, as well as systemically toxic effects. Air threshold limits are insufficient to prevent adverse health effects in the case of contact with substances with a high dermal absorption potential. Biological monitoring is a useful tool to quantify internal exposure of an individual and allows an assessment to be made of the dermal absorption pathway. Additionally, the efficacy of protective equipment can be proved. Standard gloves are ineffective to decrease dermal uptake. Various skin-care products include emulgators, which are used as penetration enhancers in transdermal therapeutic drugs. Hence, specific skin-care products potentially enhance dermal absorption of certain chemicals. On the other hand, the best protection from dermal absorption is the physiological skin barrier—the stratum corneum. Skin-care products that accelerate regeneration of the stratum corneum are obliged to have positive effects to prevent dermal absorption. With regard to the increasing number of occupational skin diseases and the large quantity of skin-care products that are used at workplaces it is essential that the mechanism of protection and efficacy be assessed. In the future, we require evidence-based prevention or evidence-based medicine that includes evidence-based prevention.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (2000) Threshold limit values and biological exposure indices 1997–1998. Cincinnati
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (1999) List of MAK and BAT values; report no. 35. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Dost AA (1995) Meeting report—a European meeting held to discuss dermal exposure monitoring and related issues. Ann Occup Hyg 39:241–255
Drexler H (1998) Assignment of the skin notation for MAK values and its legal consequences in Germany. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 71:503–505
Drexler H, Göen T, Angerer J (1995) Carbon disulphide. II. Investigations on the uptake of CS2 and the excretion of its metabolite 2-thiothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid after occupational exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 67:5–10
Fiserova-Bergerova V, Pierce JT, Droz PO (1990) Dermal absorption potential of industrial chemicals: criteria for skin notation. Am J Ind Med 17:617–635
Grandjean P (1990) Skin penetration—hazardous chemicals at work. Taylor and Francis, London pp 171–173
Kennedy GL, Brock JW Jr, Banerjee AK (1993) Assignment of skin notation for threshold limit values chemicals based on acute dermal toxicity. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 8:26–30
Korinth G, Göen T, Kruse C, Freudlsperger F, Drexler H (2000) Die Effektivität des persönlichen Körperschutzes zur Reduktion der inneren Belastung durch Schwefelkohlenstoff in der Viskoseindustrie. Zentralbl Arbeitsmed [Suppl 31]
Larese F, Fiorito A, Dobetti L, Furlan G, Fernetich E, Bussani R (1994) Skin absorption of solvents: evaluation in experimental conditions. Occup Hyg 1:191–198
Walters KA, Bialik W, Brain KR (1993) The effects of surfactants on penetration across the skin. Int J Cosmet Sci15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Paper presented at the Occupational Skin Care Management State-of-the-Art Conference, 1–3 September 2000, Zurich
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drexler, H. Skin protection and percutaneous absorption of chemical hazards. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76, 359–361 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-002-0423-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-002-0423-4
Keywords
- Dermal absorption
- Biological monitoring
- Penetration enhancement
- Protective creams