Skip to main content
Log in

Three-dimensional contact surface modeling and stress analysis of interference fit based on cylindricity error

  • Original
  • Published:
Archive of Applied Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main failure mode of a wheel–axle assembly, which is an important moving part of rail vehicles, in the interference fit zone is partial fatigue. Given that neither the plane analytical method nor the axisymmetric finite element method can reveal the local and stochastic contact stress concentration at the end of the wheel seat, this study analyzed various factors influencing a machined mating surface and found that the cylindricity error is a key factor in transforming the plane contact into a 3D contact. In addition, the experimental data of the pressing force applied to 60 groups of wheel–axle assemblies were analyzed, and the circumferential contour of the mating surface was found to conform to a beta distribution. Accordingly, a method for obtaining random interpolation points on the circumferential contour was proposed. To ensure the continuity of the mating surface, the circumferential Hermite interpolation method and the axial cubic interpolation method were employed, and the contact surface with random characteristics was modeled. Based on the random ergodicity of the mating surface, a small-sample 3D finite element model of a wheel–axle assembly was established using the random cylindricity error, and a calculation method for the 3D contact stress was proposed. Taking the RE2B axle of railway locomotive as an example, compared with the axisymmetric method, the inhomogeneity analysis of the contact stress of the small-sample model proposed in this paper could help explain the problem of local stress concentration at the end of the wheel seat. The analysis results showed that the maximum stress of the 3D model based on the cylindricity is greater than that of the axisymmetric model, enabling strength evaluation in the design of wheel–axle assemblies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang, G.M., Coquille, J.C., Fontaine, J.F., Lambertin, M.: Contact pressure between two rough surfaces of a cylindrical fit. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 123, 490–497 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00139-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kato, K., Kayaba, T., Nitta, I., Shimoda, S.: The effect of surface roughness on fitting strength of shrink fit between ceramic and metal elements. J. Vib. Acoust. 111, 318–325 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3269859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonisoli, E., Marcuccio, G., Venturini, S.: Interference fit estimation through stress-stiffening effect on dynamics. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 160, 107 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oila, A., Bull, S.J.: Assessment of the factors influencing micropitting in rolling/sliding contacts. Wear 258(10), 1510–1524 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, Y.: Engineering Elasticity. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Civan F. Stress Dependency of Permeability Represented by an Elastic Cylindrical Pore-Shell Model: Comment on Zhu et al. (Transp Porous Med (2018) 122:235–252). Transp. Porous Media 2018; 127: 573–585https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1213-0

  7. Sen, S., Aksakal, B.: Stress analysis of interference fitted shaft–hub system under transient heat transfer conditions. Mater. Des. 25, 407–417 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2003.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Strozzi, A., Baldini, A., Giacopini, M., Bertocchi, E., Bertocchi, L.: Normalization of the stress concentrations at the rounded edges of a shaft–hub interference fit. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 46, 478–491 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324711403845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanber, B.: Boundary element analysis of interference fits. Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci. 30, 323–330 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Özel, A., Temiz, Ş, Aydin, M.D., Şen, S.: Stress analysis of shrink-fitted joints for various fit forms via finite element method. Mater. Des. 26, 281–289 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Han, C., Zhang, J.: Interference assembly and fretting wear analysis of hollow shaft. Sci. World J. 2014, 919518–919518 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/919518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Croccolo, D., De Agostinis, M., Vincenzi, N.: Normalization of the stress concentrations at the rounded edges of a shaft–hub interference fit: extension to the case of a hollow shaft. J Strain Anal Eng Des 47, 131–139 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324712439982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanoue, F., Vadean, A., Sanschagrin, B.: Fretting fatigue strength reduction factor for interference fits. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 19, 1811–1823 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2011.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lanoue, F., Vadean, A., Sanschagrin, B.: Finite element analysis and contact modelling considerations of interference fits for fretting fatigue strength calculations. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 17, 1587–1602 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2009.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luo, H.Y., Liu, C.J., Li, K.: Contacting model considerations of interference fit for shaft-hub system. Adv. Mater. Res. 118–120, 294–298 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.118-120.294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paredes, M., Nefissi, N., Sartor, M.: Study of an interference fit fastener assembly by finite element modelling, analysis and experiment. Int J Interact Des Manuf 6, 171–177 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-012-0146-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, G.M., Coquille, J.C., Fontaine, J.F., Lambertin, M.: Influence of roughness on characteristics of tight interference fit of a shaft and a hub. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38, 7691–7701 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7683(01)00035-x

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lorenz, S.J., Sadeghi, F., Trivedi, H.K., et al.: A continuum damage mechanics finite element model for investigating effects of surface roughness on rolling contact fatigue. Int. J. Fatigue 143(3), 105986 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, X., et al.: The effect of resolution on the deterministic finite element elastic-plastic rough surface contact under combined normal and tangential loading. Tribol. Int. 144, 106141 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fontaine, J.F., Siala, I.E.: Form defect influence on the shrinkage fit characteristics. Eur. J. Mech. A Solids 17, 107–119 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0997-7538(98)80066-1

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Dudziak, M., Domek, G., Kołodziej, A., Talaśka, K.: Contact problems between the hub and the shaft with a three-angular shape of cross-section for different angular positions. Proc. Eng. 96, 50–58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dudziak, M., Domek, G., Kołodziej, A.: Variation of static parameters of cooperation in axisymmetric connection. Proc. Eng. 136, 56–62 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sogalad, I., Ashoka, H.N., Udupa, N.G.S.: Influence of cylindricity and surface modification on load bearing ability of interference fitted assemblies. Precis. Eng. 36, 629–640 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2012.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsai, J.-C., Chou, T.-T., Chang, C.-K.: Statistical analysis of contact stiffness for shaft-bearing assembly with tolerancing and fit. Proc. CIRP 92, 45–50 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ulrich, D., Binz, H.: An enhanced design method for 3D contact surfaces on shaft–hub connections joined through lateral extrusion. Appl. Eng. Sci. 6, 100047 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ulrich D, Binz H, Meiner R, et al.: Iterative design method for plastically stressed shaft- hub connections with optimized contact stress. In: NAFEMS World Congress 2019. 2019

  27. Boca, M., Nagit, G., Cioată, F.: Aspects concerning the circularity and cylindricity deviation of a work piece processed by turning. MATEC Web of Conferences 112, 01020 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711201020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chamble, P., Bharath, M.R., Lokeshaa, K., Singh, S.C.: Machine tool vibration on dimensional accuracy and surface roughness during milling operation of Al6082 with indexable carbide inserts. J. Appl. Res. Technol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.22201/icat.24486736e.2020.18.2.999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei, Y.: Some mathematical models of measurement of cylindricity error with multi-point method. J. China Text. Univ. (Engl. Ed.) 2, 34–39 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sun, Q., Liu, X., Mu, X., Gao, Y.: Estimation for normal contact stiffness of joint surfaces by considering the variation of critical deformation. Assem. Autom. 40, 399–406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/aa-03-2019-0059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, H., Yu, Y., Yu, J., Duan, J., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., et al.: Effect of 3D random pitting defects on the collapse pressure of pipe—part I: experiment. Thin Wall. Struct. 129, 512–526 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, X., Zhang, J., He, M., et al.: Influence of interference on process of wheel-shaft pressing. Mech. Sci. Technol. Aerosp. Eng. (2019).

  33. Gao, J.: Railway Vehicle Wheelset Assembly Technical Conditions. China Railway Publishing House, Beijing (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Anonymous: Railway Freight Car Wheelset and Rolling Bearing Assembly and Maintenance Rules. China Railway Publishing House, Beijing (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang T, Fan Z. Finite element analysis of wheel and axle pressing process. Computer Aided Engineering, 2017(1) (Chinese)

  36. Bing, Y., Zhen, L., Shoune, X., et al.: Effect of loading waveform on fatigue crack growth behavior of LZ50 axle steel. J. China Railw. Soc. 042(005), 44–50 (2020) (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the project of Research on Crack Detection of Brake Hoops of Wheel–axle Based on Acoustic Emission Technology (No. M13L00420) from CRRC QINGDAO SIFANG CO., LTD. The authors would like to sincerely thank all the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that greatly helped improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.W. involved in conceptualization, methodology, simulation, validation, and writing–original draft; H.Q. involved in conceptualization, methodology, and review and editing; W.H. involved in simulation, validation, and review and editing; D.H. involved in formal analysis and review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Yuan Qi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. We do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Introduction of beta distribution

Appendix 1: Introduction of beta distribution

The beta distribution refers to a set of continuous probability distributions defined in the interval (0,1), and its probability density function is:

$$f\left( {x;\alpha ,\beta } \right) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\frac{{x^{\alpha - 1} \left( {1 - x} \right)^{\beta - 1} }}{{\int_{0}^{1} {u^{\alpha - 1} } \left( {1 - u} \right)^{\beta - 1} du}} = \frac{{\Gamma \left( {\alpha + \beta } \right)}}{\Gamma \left( \alpha \right)\Gamma \left( \beta \right)}x^{\alpha - 1} \left( {1 - x} \right)^{\beta - 1} ,} \hfill & {0 < x < 1} \hfill \\ {0,} \hfill & {{\text{other}}} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right.$$
(14)

where \(\alpha \ge 0, \, \beta > 0\).

Mathematical expectation and variance are expressed as follows:

$$\mu = E\left( x \right) = \frac{\alpha }{\alpha + \beta }$$
(15)
$${\text{Var}}\left( X \right) = \frac{\alpha \beta }{{\left( {\alpha + \beta } \right)^{2} \left( {\alpha + \beta + 1} \right)}}$$
(16)

\(\Gamma ( \cdot )\) represents the \(\Gamma\) distribution:

$$f\left( x \right) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\frac{{\lambda ^{e} }}{{\Gamma \left( \alpha \right)}}x^{{a - 1}} e^{{ - \lambda x}} ,} \hfill & {x \ge 0} \hfill \\ {0,} \hfill & {x < 0} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right.$$
(17)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, CP., Qi, HY., Hao, WX. et al. Three-dimensional contact surface modeling and stress analysis of interference fit based on cylindricity error. Arch Appl Mech 92, 993–1014 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-021-02089-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-021-02089-8

Keywords

Navigation