# Transverse vibrations of a beam under an axial load: minimal model of a triangular frame

- 1.6k Downloads

## Abstract

The paper is devoted to transverse in-plane vibrations of a beam which is a part of a symmetrical triangular frame. A mathematical model based on the Hamilton principle, formulated for large deflections of the beam subjected to dynamic axial excitation, is presented. An approximate nonlinear ordinary differential equation for the vibration amplitude is derived by means of the Galerkin method. Dynamics of the system is studied numerically for the two cases: harmonic and pulsating load. Various values of the model parameters, including the excitation amplitude and frequency, are considered. The amplitude is taken to be below or above the static critical load. The regions of stable and unstable solutions are determined in parameter planes by evaluation of the maximal Lyapunov exponent. The results are compared to the case of the abbreviated (linear) dynamical system. The stable and unstable beam responses are analysed and classified.

## Keywords

Triangular frame Nonlinear vibrations Dynamic stability Time-periodic systems## 1 Introduction

Behaviour of elastic structures like beams/columns under axial loads is a classical problem, studied mainly in the context of static or dynamic stability. Timoshenko and Gere [21] discussed elastic buckling of a wide variety of structural elements, including bars and frames. An extensive review of stability problems was presented by Bažant and Cedolin [2]. Virgin [23] focused attention on the interplay between vibrations and stability in axially loaded structures. Parametrically excited systems of this type, described by linear or nonlinear time-periodic models, were considered by McLachlan [17], Gutowski and Swietlicki [8], and Łuczko [13]. The general theory of dynamic stability of elastic structures and its applications were presented by Bolotin [4].

This paper is devoted to nonlinear vibrations of a beam which is a part of a symmetrical triangular frame. Recently, Magnucki and Milecki [14] studied static buckling of such a system. However, closed planar frames, including the triangular ones, are rarely analysed in the literature related to the field of dynamics. Moreover, vibrational problems for frame structures are usually solved by using the finite element approach (e.g. see [22, 24]). In what follows, the cross-beam of the triangular frame is appropriately isolated from the system, which simplifies both the model and analysis.

The work is an extension of the conference paper [7]. In Sect. 2, a minimal mathematical model for vibration of the triangular frame is formulated. Section 3 begins with a short discussion of a parametric and nonlinear character of the system in terms of analytical methods. Then, the results of numerical studies for harmonic and pulsating loads are presented. Finally, conclusions and remarks are given in Sect. 4.

## 2 Mathematical model

*C*of the frame is fixed while the others,

*A*and

*B*, are simply supported out-of-plane and subjected to in-plane load.

Such a system can be regarded as a simple representation of a brake triangle that has been produced on a large scale for the railway industry. It is an important component of bogie brake systems suitable for various types of wagons. The triangle transmits the braking force from a brake cylinder to brake pads that, in turn, mate with rail wheels [15].

In paper by Magnucki and Milecki [14], one can find, among others, the relations between the internal forces in the cross-beam, i.e. the axial force \(N_2\) and the bending moment \(M_{b2}\), and the load *F*. Now, in-plane vibrations of the system are considered, i.e. the load is assumed to be a function of time, \(F = F(t)\). To simplify dynamic analysis, the beam is isolated from the structure as can be seen in Fig. 1b. The beam is treated as simply supported but subjected to the axial force \(N_2(t)\) and opposite end moments \(M_{2}(t)\). For simplicity energy dissipation is neglected.

Behaviour of the beam is described by the transverse deflection \(w(x,\, t)\). The axial displacement of a given point is \(u(x,\, z,\, t)\), where *z* denotes the distance from the neutral surface. A small element of the beam is illustrated in Fig. 2. In order to describe vibrations of the system, we take an approximate energy approach.

*E*is Young’s modulus and

## 3 Numerical studies of the nonlinear system

### 3.1 Remarks on analytical treatment of nonlinear time-periodic ODEs

The single approximate governing equation (15) seems to have a quite simple form. However, it combines two fundamental features that considerably complicate solving the problem analytically. Firstly, the model is an ODE with a time-periodic coefficient, i.e. a parametrically excited system. Secondly, it includes a strong nonlinearity.

*Q*of the governing equation. In recent years, some analytical methods for strongly nonlinear systems have been developed, too (e.g. the modified/adopted Lindstedt–Poincaré method or homotopy method). Usually, they are suited to certain type of nonlinearity only and are not generally applicable [6, 16].

As will be seen further, from practical viewpoint Eq. (15) cannot be considered to contain the small perturbation parameter. In other words, the influence of both the cubic and time-periodic terms is rather strong. Due to limitations of the most of analytical methods and for convenience reasons, character of our studies is almost purely numerical.

### 3.2 Vibrations under harmonic load

*b*(and \(c = A_1/b\)) will be altered.

Basic values of parameters used in numerical simulations

Parameter | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|

Beam length, \(L_2\) | 1352 | mm |

Inner diameter, \(d_0\) | 50 | mm |

Outer diameter, \(d_1\) | 60 | mm |

Area of the cross section of the arms, \(A_1\) | 1000 | mm\(^2\) |

Angle between the arms and cross-beam, \(\alpha \) | \(\pi /9\) | rad |

Young’s modulus, | \(2\times 10^5\) | MPa |

Density, \(\rho \) | 7850 | \(\hbox {kg/m}^3\) |

*b*(at the given data: \(b \le 18\) mm); otherwise, the system undergoes lateral buckling [14]. As presented in Fig. 4, the static critical load of the beam, \(N_{2\text {cr}}\), increases with increasing

*b*. At the same time, such a strengthening of the arms in respect of in-plane bending decreases the coefficient of the cubic term, \(\gamma \). The question is how it affects the dynamics of the beam.

Initially, the results obtained for \(b = 20\) mm are presented (\(\gamma \approx 1.69\)); suppose that the imperfection amplitude \(\varepsilon _{0}= 10^{-3}\). Figure 5a shows the parameter plane \((\varOmega ,\, a)\) with regions of stable and unstable motion of the system. More precisely, the areas filled with grey relate to positive values of the maximal Lyapunov exponent (MLE), \(\lambda _{1}\). The map has been computed with steps \(\Delta f = 1\) Hz and \(\Delta a = 0.1\). The Lyapunov exponents have been evaluated using the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization procedure and renormalization [13, 19]. Taking into account relatively slow convergence of the numerical computations in the analysed undamped case, vibrations are classified as chaotic if \(\lambda _{1}\ge \varepsilon _{1}\), where \(\varepsilon _{1}\) is a small positive value (here \(\varepsilon _{1}= 0.02\)).

*T*-periodic (solid line) and 2

*T*-periodic solutions (dashed line) [4, 8, 17]. Here, the dependencies \(a(\varOmega )\) have been determined by means of the Rayleigh method that, in fact, is a variant of the harmonic balance method. The steady-state solutions are assumed to have the forms [8]:

*a*. As the load amplitude increases, \(X_{\text {rel}}\) grows significantly but does not exceed \(4\times 10^4\).

By analogy to Fig. 5, a stability diagram for \(b = 50\) mm (\(\gamma \approx 1.14\)) is shown in Fig. 6. As in the previous case, the critical value of \(\lambda _{1}\) has been set to 0.02. Again the lower contour of the unstable region is quite well approximated by the curves determined analytically for the linear system. Nevertheless, it seems that an increase in *b* gradually enlarges the scattered regions indicating regular dynamics and shifts them towards lower values of both the load amplitude and frequency.

More detailed analysis of numerical solutions is presented in the next subsection.

### 3.3 Vibrations under pulsating load

In Fig. 7a, the stable and unstable regions for the beam are presented for \(b = 20\) mm (\(\lambda _{1}= 0.02, \varepsilon _{0}= 10^{-3}\)). The transition curves resulting from the simple approximation of type (20) do not occur in pairs and therefore do not form the typical tongues. However, the stability boundary with a tip at \(\varOmega = 2\) is sufficiently accurately predicted by the linear case. Unlike in the previous numerical experiment, there are no scattered subregions of stable solutions for high values of *a*.

To give a deeper insight into the approximate values of the maximal Lyapunov exponent, a more detailed filled contour plot is given in Fig. 7b. Each cell is a rectangle of dimensions \(\Delta \varOmega \times \Delta a\). As can be seen, there are only several single points representing \(\lambda _{1}< 0\). The stable region relates mostly to the range \(0 \le \lambda _{1}< 0.01\). The unstable region, in turn, is mainly occupied by the cells connected with evidently chaotic dynamics (\(\lambda _{1}\ge 1\)). Thus, the maps should be treated as a rather rough evaluation tool for determination of the vibration type. Naturally, this approximate character is a matter of a balance between the three factors: resolution of the map (\(\Delta \varOmega , \Delta a\)), length of the analysed time range of the system evolution, and computation time.

Selected steady-state responses of the system for \(\varOmega = 1.6\) (see Fig. 8) are illustrated in Fig. 9 in the form of phase portraits. Similar to the linear case, the stable region is dominated by aperiodic vibrations. Below and above the instability tongue (\(a = 0.3\) and \(a = 1\)) quasi-periodic motion occurs (Fig. 9a, c). In the first case, the plane phase \((q,\, \dot{q})\) is occupied by the trajectory projection so densely that the diagram constitutes an annulus. More disordered vibrations with much higher amplitudes of both the displacement and velocity can be observed within the unstable regions. The solution corresponding to \(a = 2\) is depicted in Fig. 9b, while apparently chaotic behaviour for \(a = 3\) is shown in Fig. 9d. Note that \(q > 1\) means \(w_a > d_1\), i.e. large deflections of the beam, which definitely goes beyond the classical (linear) beam theory.

The vibrations can be more precisely classified by means of the Poincaré maps and frequency spectra. The results of the application of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) are presented in Fig. 10. Here, \(\varOmega _k\) is a discrete dimensionless frequency (\(k = 0,1,2,\ldots \)), i.e. related to \(\omega _1\), whereas \(|\overline{q}_k|\) denotes the spectral magnitude. The spectra of a discrete nature with two dominating frequencies correspond to the quasi-periodic solutions (Fig. 10a, c). Presumably, these frequencies are incommensurable. The chaotic solution typically has a continuous Fourier spectrum (Fig. 10d). A similar effect occurs for the other unstable case; however, the spectral lines are concentrated over a narrower frequency range (Fig. 10b).

Instability of the latter type may require more attention. As mentioned before, the beam is excited to high amplitudes which nevertheless do not increase exponentially like in the linear system. Differences between such behaviour and the stable one are shown in Fig. 11. In the standard quasi-periodic case, the peak amplitude varies approximately sinusoidally. The unstable response undergoes another kind of modulation: the amplitude changes sharply from very low to very high values (small vs. large deflections). This beating-like phenomenon was analysed by Kidachi and Onogi [11] who studied the Mathieu equation modified by cubic nonlinearity. The researchers used the term ’pseudo-unstable state’. More precisely, such a solution is unstable in the sense that it exhibits exponential growth and decay by turns. For the same reason, the response does not escape to infinity, and the system cyclically returns to the neighbourhood of the initial state.

Comparison of the discussed results and the ones for \(b = 50\) mm indicated very slight differences in the stability diagrams and the maps of the MLE values. Also, a more detailed analysis of the MLE computed at selected levels of the amplitude *a* in the frequency range \(0 < \varOmega \le 2.5\), for \(10 \le b \le 90\) mm (\(\Delta b = 1\) mm) has been conducted. The effect of *b* on \(\lambda _{1}\) seems to be negligible; all in all, the stable and unstable ranges (at certain *a*) remain the same. Moreover, the results turned out to be almost insensitive to changes in the initial value, \(\varepsilon _{0}\). However, it should be noted that only relatively small imperfection amplitudes were examined (e.g. \(\varepsilon _{0}= 2\times 10^{-3},\, 5\times 10^{-3},\, 10^{-2}\)).

## 4 Conclusions

The problem of dynamics of the symmetrical triangular frame has been reduced to the problem of transverse parametric vibration of the cross-beam. The minimal mathematical model of the system has been formulated by means of the Hamilton principle and the Galerkin method. The time-periodic and nonlinear character of the system has been briefly discussed in terms of approximate analytical methods. The regions of stable and unstable solutions have been determined in the ’load frequency–amplitude’ plane. For harmonic axial load, the lower boundaries of the parametric instability zones are well approximated by the transition curves specified for the abbreviated system. Moreover, some scattered subregions of regular motion occur and become larger as the width of the frame arms increases. This effect is not present in the case of pulsating load. The stable regions are dominated by quasi-periodic dynamics of the nonlinear system. Within the unstable regions, in turn, the vibration amplitude of the beam increases significantly but remains bounded. The behaviour is not necessarily strictly chaotic, the pseudo-unstable states can be observed too.

This kind of analysis, focused on both the vibration type and amplitude growth, is crucial in the formulation of safety conditions for the structure, i.e. certain criteria for the so-called technical stability. However, from a practical viewpoint, the dynamic stability issue is associated mainly with behaviour of a system under suddenly applied loads (e.g. an impulse or step load). Since the problem is of great importance in the particular case of brake triangles, it merits special attention in further studies of the mechanical system.

## Notes

### Acknowledgments

The research has been supported by 02/21/DSMK/3457 Grant and 02/21/DSPB/3477 Grant.

## References

- 1.Awrejcewicz, J., Manevitch, L.I., Andrianov, I.V.: Asymptotic Approaches in Nonlinear Dynamics: New Trends and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bažant, Z.P., Cedolin, L.: Stability of Structures: Elastic, Inelastic, Fracture and Damage Theories. World Scientific, London (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bogoliubov, N., Mitropolsky, Y.A.: Asymptotic Methods in the Theory of Non-Linear Oscillations. Gordon & Breach, New York (1961)Google Scholar
- 4.Bolotin, V.V.: The Dynamic Stability of Elastic Systems. Holden-Day, San Francisco (1964)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 5.Cunningham, W.J.: Introduction to Nonlinear Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York (1958)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cveticanin, L.: Strongly Nonlinear Oscillators: Analytical Solutions. Springer, Cham (2014)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fritzkowski, P., Magnucki, K., Milecki, S.: Nonlinear transverse vibrations of a beam under an axial load. In: Awrejcewicz, J., Kaźmierczak, M., Mrozowski, J., Olejnik, P. (eds.) Dynamical Systems: Mechatronics and Life Sciences, pp. 175–184. Łódź, Poland (2015). 13th Conference on Dynamical Systems—Theory and Applications DSTA 2015Google Scholar
- 8.Gutowski, R., Swietlicki, W.A.: Dynamics and Vibrations of Mechanical Systems. PWN, Warsaw (1986). (in Polish)Google Scholar
- 9.Huang, Y.Q., Lu, H.W., Fu, J.Y., Liu, A.R., Gu, M.: Dynamic stability of Euler beams under axial unsteady wind force. Math. Probl. Eng.
**2014**(4), 434,868 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 10.Jing, L., Shang-Chun, F., Yan, L., Zhan-She, G.: Dynamic stability of parametrically-excited linear resonant beams under periodic axial force. Chin. Phys. B
**21**(11), 110,401 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.Kidachi, H., Onogi, H.: Note on the stability of the nonlinear Mathieu equation. Prog. Theor. Phys.
**98**(4), 755–773 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.Kovacic, I., Brennan, M.J. (eds.): The Duffing Equation: Nonlinear Oscillators and Their Behaviour. Wiley, New York (2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 13.Łuczko, J.: Regular and Chaotic Vibrations in Nonlinear Mechanical Systems. Publishing House of the Cracow University of Technology, Cracow (2008). (in Polish)Google Scholar
- 14.Magnucki, K., Milecki, S.: Elastic buckling of a triangular frame subject to in-plane tension. J. Theor. Appl. Mech.
**53**(3), 581–591 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 15.Magnucki, K., Stawecki, W. (eds.): Strength and Stability of a Brake Triangle. The Rail Vehicles Institute TABOR, Poznan (2015). (in Polish)Google Scholar
- 16.Marinca, V., Herisanu, N.: Nonlinear Dynamical Systems in Engineering: Some Approximate Approaches. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 17.McLachlan, N.W.: Ordinary Non-linear Differential Equations in Engineering and Physical Sciences. Oxford University Press, London (1950)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 18.Nayfeh, A.H., Mook, D.T.: Nonlinear Oscillations. Wiley, New York (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ott, E.: Chaos in Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 20.Rao, S.S.: Vibration of Continuous Systems. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)Google Scholar
- 21.Timoshenko, S.P., Gere, J.M.: Theory of Elastic Stability. McGraw-Hill, New York (1963)Google Scholar
- 22.Triantafyllou, S., Koumousis, V.: Small and large displacement dynamic analysis of frame structures based on hysteretic beam elements. J. Eng. Mech.
**138**(1), 36–49 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.Virgin, L.N.: Vibration of Axially Loaded Structures. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 24.Xue, Q., Meek, J.L.: Dynamic response and instability of frame structures. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
**190**, 5233–5242 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.