Abstract
Using finite element tools for the dimensioning of rubber components is state of the art. When conducting finite element simulations, a split of the strain energy function, which results in stresses, into a deviatoric and a volumetric part is made. The mechanical behaviour of reinforced natural rubber under hydrostatic pressure is determined to prove the validity of this assumption. Furthermore, a nearly incompressible material behaviour is assumed in simulations of rubber, which may cause an insufficient outcome quality especially for rubber components that are exposed to hydrostatic pressure like highly confined bushings. In this paper, a method is presented to determine the compressibility, or its reciprocal the bulk modulus of rubber. The effect of the bulk modulus of a natural rubber on the simulation results of a bearing is pointed out. The obtained results are compared to test data to show the significance of the value of the bulk modulus for achieving a satisfactory outcome quality. Therefore, reliable information about the in-use behaviour of rubber components is obtained to reduce the costs and the effort in the dimensioning process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mooney M.: A theory of large elastic deformation. J. Appl. Phys. 11, 582–592 (1940)
Ogden R.W.: Large deformation isotropic elasticity—on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proc. R. Soc. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 326, 565–584 (1972)
Boyce M.C.: Direct comparison of the Gent and Arruda-Boyce constitutive models of rubber elasticity. Rubber Chem. Technol. 69, 781–785 (1996)
Kilian H.G.: Equations of state of real networks. Polym 22, 209–216 (1981)
Ogden R.W.: Non-linear Elastic Deformations. Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1984)
Adams L.H., Gibson R.E.: The compressibility of rubber. J. Acad. Sci. 20, 213–223 (1930)
Hartmann S., Neff P.: Polyconvexity of generalized polynomial-type hyperelastic strain energy functions for near-incompressibility. Int. J. Solids Struct. 40, 2767–2791 (2003)
Le Cam J.B.: A review of volume changes in rubbers: the effect of stretching. Rubber Chem. Technol. 83, 247–269 (2010)
Stommel M., Zimmermann J.: Determination of the compression behaviour of rubber components under hydrostatic pressure. Const. Model Rubber. 7, 397–401 (2012)
Haupt P., Sedlan K.: Viscoplasticity of elastomeric materials: experimental facts and constitutive modelling. Arch. Appl. Mech. 71, 89–109 (2001)
Horgan C.O., Murphy J.G.: On the volumetric part of the strain-energy function used in the constitutive modelling if slightly compressible solid rubbers. Int. J. Solids Struct. 46, 3078–3085 (2009)
Horgan C.O., Murphy J.G.: Compression tests and constitutive models for the slight compressibility of elastic rubber-like materials. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 47, 1232–1239 (2009)
Penn R.W.: Volume changes accompanying the extension of rubber. Trans. Soc. Rheol. 14, 509–517 (1970)
Krevelen D.W.V.: Properties of Polymers. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimmermann, J., Stommel, M. The mechanical behaviour of rubber under hydrostatic compression and the effect on the results of finite element analyses. Arch Appl Mech 83, 293–302 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-012-0655-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-012-0655-z