Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element analysis for train–track–bridge interaction system

  • Original
  • Published:
Archive of Applied Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article deals with the dynamic analysis of train–track–bridge interaction system using the finite element method. In this interaction system, each four-wheelset vehicle in the train is modeled by a mass–spring–damper system with 10 degrees of freedom; the rails and the bridge decks are modeled as a number of Bernoulli–Euler beam elements, while the elasticity and damping properties of the rail bed are represented by continuous springs and dampers. The equation of motion for the interaction system is presented in matrix form with time-dependent coefficients. The correctness of the proposed procedure is illustrated by a comparison with the numerical result from the existing literature. Several numerical examples are chosen to investigate the effect of two types of vehicle models, two types of bridge models and three damping values of bridge on the maximum dynamic responses of train, track and bridges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Au F.T.K., Cheng Y.S. and Cheung Y.K. (2001). Vibration analysis of bridges under moving vehicles and trains: an overview. Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. 3(3): 299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Au F.T.K., Wang J.J. and Cheung Y.K. (2001). Impact study of cable-stayed bridge under railway traffic using various models. J. Sound Vib. 240(3): 447–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bathe K.J. and Wilson E.L. (1976). Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chatterjee P.K., Datta T.K. and Surana C.S. (1994). Vibration of continuous bridges under moving vehicles. J. Sound Vib. 169(5): 619–632

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng Y.S., Au F.T.K. and Cheung Y.K. (2001). Vibration of railway bridges under a moving train by using bridge-track-vehicle element. Eng. Struct. 23(12): 1597–1606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheung Y.K., Au F.T.K., Zheng D.Y. and Cheng Y.S. (1999). Vibration of multi-span non-uniform bridges under moving vehicles and trains by using modified beam vibration functions. J. Sound Vib. 228(3): 611–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chu K.H., Garg V.K. and Wang T.L. (1986). Impact in railway prestressed concrete bridges. J. Struct. Eng. (ASCE) 112(5): 1036–1051

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frýba L. (1996). Dynamics of Railway Bridges. Thomas Telford, London, 67–77

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frýba L. (2001). A rough assessment of railway bridges for high speed trains. Eng. Struct. 23(5): 548–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Henchi K., Fafard M., Dhatt G. and Talbot M. (1997). Dynamic behaviour of multi-span beams under moving loads. J. Sound Vibr. 199(1): 33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ichikawa M., Miyakawa Y. and Matsuda A. (2000). Vibration analysis of the continuous beam subjected to a moving mass. J. Sound Vib. 230(3): 493–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kortuem W. and Wormley D.N. (1981). Dynamic Interactions between Travelling Vehicles and Guideway Systems. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 10(4–5): 285–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Le, R., Ripke, B., Zacher, M.: Ballast mats on high speed bridges. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN’99, Prague (Czech Republic), pp. 699–703 (1999)

  14. Li J. and Su M. (1999). The resonant vibration for a simply supported girder bridge under high-speed trains. J. Sound Vib. 224(5): 897–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lou P. (2005). A vehicle-track-bridge interaction element considering vehicle’s pitching effect. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 41(4): 397–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lou P. (2005). Vertical dynamic responses of a simply supported bridge subjected to a moving train with two-wheelset vehicles using modal analysis method. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 64(9): 1207–1235

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lou P. (2006). Comparison of two types of deflection functions for analyzing the responses of the rail and the bridge under static or moving vehicles. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. K J. Multibody Dyn. 220(2): 105–123

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lou P., Dai G.L. and Zeng Q.Y. (2005). Modal coordinate formulations for a simply supported bridge subjected to a moving train modelled as two-stage suspension vehicles. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 219(10): 1027–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lou P. and Zeng Q.Y. (2005). Formulation of equations of motion of finite element form for vehicle-track-bridge interaction system with two types of vehicle model. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 62(3): 435–474

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lou P. and Zeng Q.Y. (2005). Finite element based formulations for vehicle–bridge interaction system considering vertical motion. J. Struct. Eng. 32(4): 261–273

    Google Scholar 

  21. Newmark N.M. (1959). A method of computation for structural dynamics. J. Eng. Mech. Div. (ASCE) 85(3): 67–94

    Google Scholar 

  22. Olsson M. (1985). Finite element, modal co-ordinate analysis of structures subjected to moving loads. J. Sound Vib. 99(1):   1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Paz M. (1989). Modified dynamic condensation method. J. Struct. Eng. (ASCE) 115(1): 234–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang T.L., Garg V.K. and Chu K.H. (1991). Railway bridge/vehicle interaction studies with new vehicle model. J. Struct. Eng. (ASCE) 117(7): 2099–2116

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wiriyachai A., Chu K.H. and Garg V.K. (1982). Bridge impact due to wheel and track irregularities. J. Eng. Mech. (ASCE) 108(4): 648–666

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu Y.S. and Yang Y.B. (2003). Steady-state response and riding comfort of trains moving over a series of simply supported bridges. Eng. Struct. 25(2): 251–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang Y.B., Chang C.H. and Yau J.D. (1999). An element for analyzing vehicle-bridge systems considering vehicle’s pitching effect. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 46(7): 1031–1047

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang Y.B. and Lin B.H. (1995). Vehicle-bridge interaction analysis by dynamic condensation method. J. Struct. Eng. (ASCE) 121(11): 1636–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang Y.B. and Yau J.D. (1997). Vehicle-bridge interaction element for dynamic analysis. J. Struct. Eng.(ASCE) 123(11): 1512–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang Y.B., Yau J.D. and Hsu L.C. (1997). Vibration of simple beams due to trains moving at high speeds. Eng. Struct. 19(11): 936–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yau J.D., Yang Y.B. and Kuo S.R. (1999). Impact response of high speed rail bridges and riding comfort of rail cars. Eng. Struct. 21(9): 836–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zeng Q.Y. (2001). The principle of a stationary value of total potential energy of dynamic system(in Chinese). J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. 28(1): 1–3

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeng Q.Y. and Guo X.R. (1999). Theory and Application of Vibration Analysis of Train-Bridge Time-Dependent System. China Railway Publishing House, Beijing, 15–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Lou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lou, P. Finite element analysis for train–track–bridge interaction system. Arch Appl Mech 77, 707–728 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-007-0122-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-007-0122-4

Keywords

Navigation