Abstract
The nuclear lamina represents a multifunctional platform involved in such diverse yet interconnected processes as spatial organization of the genome, maintenance of mechanical stability of the nucleus, regulation of transcription and replication. Most of lamina activities are exerted through tethering of lamina-associated chromatin domains (LADs) to the nuclear periphery. Yet, the lamina is a dynamic structure demonstrating considerable expansion during the cell cycle to accommodate increased number of LADs formed during DNA replication. We analyzed dynamics of nuclear growth during interphase and changes in lamina structure as a function of cell cycle progression. The nuclear lamina demonstrates steady growth from G1 till G2, while quantitative analysis of lamina meshwork by super-resolution microscopy revealed that microdomain organization of the lamina is maintained, with lamin A and lamin B microdomain periodicity and interdomain gap sizes unchanged. FRAP analysis, in contrast, demonstrated differences in lamin A and B1 exchange rates; the latter showing higher recovery rate in S-phase cells. In order to further analyze the mechanism of lamina growth in interphase, we generated a lamina-free nuclear envelope in living interphase cells by reversible hypotonic shock. The nuclear envelope in nuclear buds formed after such a treatment initially lacked lamins, and analysis of lamina formation revealed striking difference in lamin A and B1 assembly: lamin A reassembled within 30 min post-treatment, whereas lamin B1 did not incorporate into the newly formed lamina at all. We suggest that in somatic cells lamin B1 meshwork growth is coordinated with replication of LADs, and lamin A meshwork assembly seems to be chromatin-independent process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaronson RP, Blobel G (1974) On the attachment of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 62:746–754. doi:10.1083/jcb.62.3.746
Andrulis ED, Neiman AM, Zappulla DC, Sternglanz R (1998) Perinuclear localization of chromatin facilitates transcriptional silencing. Nature 394:592–595. doi:10.1038/29100
Belmont AS, Bruce K (1994) Visualization of G1 chromosomes: a folded, twisted, supercoiled chromonema model of interphase chromatid structure. J Cell Biol 127:287–302. doi:10.1083/jcb.127.2.287
Belmont AS, Zhai Y, Thilenius A (1993) Lamin B distribution and association with peripheral chromatin revealed by optical sectioning and electron microscopy tomography. J Cell Biol 123:1671–1685
Broers JL, Machiels BM, van Eys GJ et al (1999) Dynamics of the nuclear lamina as monitored by GFP-tagged A-type lamins. J Cell Sci 112:3463–3475
Carpenter AE, Jones TR, Lamprecht MR et al (2006) Cell Profiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7:R100. doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100
Cherepaninets VD, Zhironkina OA, Strelkova OS et al (2015) Cohesion peculiarities in Eu and heterochromatin in human cells. Cell Tissue Biol 9:173–181. doi:10.1134/S1990519X15030025
Cook PR, Brazell IA (1980) Mapping sequences in loops of nuclear DNA by their progressive detachment from the nuclear cage. Nucleic Acids Res 8:2895–2906
Dahl KN, Scaffidi P, Islam MF et al (2006) Distinct structural and mechanical properties of the nuclear lamina in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10271–10276. doi:10.1073/pnas.0601058103
Dechat T, Adam SA, Goldman RD (2009) Nuclear lamins and chromatin: when structure meets function. Adv Enzyme Regul 49:157–166. doi:10.1016/j.advenzreg.2008.12.003
Dechat T, Adam SA, Taimen P et al (2010) Nuclear lamins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a000547. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000547
Dileep V, Rivera-Mulia JC, Sima J, Gilbert DM (2015) Large-scale chromatin structure–function relationships during the cell cycle and development: insights from replication timing. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. doi:10.1101/sqb.2015.80.027284
Dimitrova DS (2002) The spatio-temporal organization of DNA replication sites is identical in primary, immortalized and transformed mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 115:4037–4051. doi:10.1242/jcs.00087
Dimitrova DS, Gilbert DM (1999) The spatial position and replication timing of chromosomal domains are both established in early G1 phase. Mol Cell 4:983–993
Ellenberg J, Siggia ED, Moreira JE et al (1997) Nuclear membrane dynamics and reassembly in living cells: targeting of an inner nuclear membrane protein in interphase and mitosis. J Cell Biol 138:1193–1206
Filigheddu N, Gnocchi VF, Coscia M et al (2007) Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin promote differentiation and fusion of C2C12 skeletal muscle cells. Mol Biol Cell 18:986–994. doi:10.1091/mbc.E06
Finlan LE, Sproul D, Thomson I et al (2008) Recruitment to the nuclear periphery can alter expression of genes in human cells. PLoS Genet 4:e1000039. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000039
Foisy S, Bibor-Hardy V (1988) Synthesis of nuclear lamins in BHK-21 cells synchronized with aphidicolin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 156:205–210
Gerace L, Comeau C, Benson M (1984) Organization and modulation of nuclear lamina structure. J Cell Sci 1:137–160
Gilbert DM, Takebayashi S-I, Ryba T et al (2010) Space and time in the nucleus: developmental control of replication timing and chromosome architecture. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 75:143–153. doi:10.1101/sqb.2010.75.011
Guelen L, Pagie L, Brasset E et al (2008) Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453:948–951. doi:10.1038/nature06947
Haque F, Lloyd DJ, Smallwood DT et al (2006) SUN1 interacts with nuclear lamin A and cytoplasmic nesprins to provide a physical connection between the nuclear lamina and the cytoskeleton. Mol Cell Biol 26:3738–3751. doi:10.1128/MCB.26.10.3738-3751.2006
Höger TH, Grund C, Franke WW, Krohne G (1991) Immunolocalization of lamins in the thick nuclear lamina of human synovial cells. Eur J Cell Biol 54:150–156
Kind J, Pagie L, Ortabozkoyun H et al (2013) Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 153:178–192. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.028
King MC, Drivas TG, Blobel G (2008) A network of nuclear envelope membrane proteins linking centromeres to microtubules. Cell 134:427–438. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.022
Kireev II, Zatsepina OV, Poliakov VI, Chentsov IS (1988) Ultrastructure of the mitotic chromosomes in pig embryonic kidney cells during their reversible artificial decondensation in vivo. Tsitologiia 30:926–932
Kurchashova SI, Filimonenko VV, Gulak PV et al (2003) Induction of nuclear envelope formation around individual chromosomes under impact of hypotonic shock. Tsitologiia 45:298–307
Leonhardt H, Rahn HP, Weinzierl P et al (2000) Dynamics of DNA replication factories in living cells. J Cell Biol 149:271–280
Li G, Sudlow G, Belmont AS (1998) Interphase cell cycle dynamics of a late-replicating, heterochromatic homogeneously staining region: precise choreography of condensation/decondensation and nuclear positioning. J Cell Biol 140:975–989
Lubelsky Y, Prinz JA, DeNapoli L et al (2014) DNA replication and transcription programs respond to the same chromatin cues. Genome Res 24:1102–1114. doi:10.1101/gr.160010.113
Ly T, Ahmad Y, Shlien A et al (2014) A proteomic chronology of gene expression through the cell cycle in human myeloid leukemia cells. Elife 3:e01630. doi:10.7554/eLife.01630
Maul GG, Maul HM, Scogna JE et al (1972) Time sequence of nuclear pore formation in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lymphocytes and in HeLa cells during the cell cycle. J Cell Biol 55:433–447. doi:10.1083/jcb.55.2.433
Moir RD, Yoon M, Khuon S, Goldman RD (2000) Nuclear lamins A and B1: different pathways of assembly during nuclear envelope formation in living cells. J Cell Biol 151:1155–1168
Neumann FR, Nurse P (2007) Nuclear size control in fission yeast. J Cell Biol 179:593–600. doi:10.1083/jcb.200708054
O’Keefe RT, Henderson SC, Spector DL (1992) Dynamic organization of DNA replication in mammalian cell nuclei: spatially and temporally defined replication of chromosome-specific alpha-satellite DNA sequences. J Cell Biol 116:1095–1110
Onishchenko GE, Chentsov IS (1974) Granular layer of the peripheral chromatin in the interphase nucleus. II. Cytochemical characteristics and properties. Tsitologiia 16:931–935
Ono T, Yamashita D, Hirano T (2013) Condensin II initiates sister chromatid resolution during S phase. J Cell Biol 200:429–441. doi:10.1083/jcb.201208008
Ottaviano Y, Gerace L (1985) Phosphorylation of the nuclear lamins during interphase and mitosis. J Biol Chem 260:624–632
Paddy MR, Belmont AS, Saumweber H et al (1990) Interphase nuclear envelope lamins form a discontinuous network that interacts with only a fraction of the chromatin in the nuclear periphery. Cell 62:89–106. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90243-8
Peric-Hupkes D, Meuleman W, Pagie L et al (2010) Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 38:603–613. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.016
Razafsky D, Hodzic D (2009) Bringing KASH under the SUN: the many faces of nucleo-cytoskeletal connections. J Cell Biol 186:461–472. doi:10.1083/jcb.200906068
Reddy KL, Zullo JM, Bertolino E, Singh H (2008) Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 452:243–247. doi:10.1038/nature06727
Salic A, Mitchison TJ (2008) A chemical method for fast and sensitive detection of DNA synthesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci US\A 105:2415–2420. doi:10.1073/pnas.0712168105
Santos A, Wernersson R, Jensen LJ (2015) Cyclebase 3.0: a multi-organism database on cell-cycle regulation and phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D1140–D1144. doi:10.1093/nar/gku1092
Shimi T, Pfleghaar K, Kojima S et al (2008) The A- and B-type nuclear lamin networks: microdomains involved in chromatin organization and transcription. Genes Dev 22:3409–3421. doi:10.1101/gad.1735208
Shimi T, Kittisopikul M, Tran J et al (2015) Structural organization of nuclear lamins A, C, B1 and B2 revealed by super-resolution microscopy. Mol Biol Cell 26:4075–4086. doi:10.1091/mbc.E15-07-0461
Towbin BD, Meister P, Pike BL, Gasser SM (2010) Repetitive transgenes in C. elegans accumulate heterochromatic marks and are sequestered at the nuclear envelope in a copy-number- and lamin-dependent manner. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 75:555–565. doi:10.1101/sqb.2010.75.041
Towbin BD, Gonzalez-Sandoval A, Gasser SM (2013) Mechanisms of heterochromatin subnuclear localization. Trends Biochem Sci 38:356–363. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2013.04.004
Uzbekov RE, Vorob’ev IA (1991) The effect of UV microirradiation of the centrosome on cell behavior. I. The destruction of the mitotic spindle and disruption of cell division during irradiation in the metaphase. Tsitologiia 33:15–22
Vogel MJ, Peric-Hupkes D, van Steensel B (2007) Detection of in vivo protein-DNA interactions using DamID in mammalian cells. Nat Protoc 2:1467–1478. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.148
Wilson KL, Berk JM (2010) The nuclear envelope at a glance. J Cell Sci 123:1973–1978. doi:10.1242/jcs.019042
Wilson KL, Foisner R (2010) Lamin-binding Proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a000554. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000554
Zhironkina OA, Kurchashova SY, Brattseva AL et al (2015) Overcoming steric hindrances during replication of peripheral heterochromatin. Cell Tissue Biol 9:110–118. doi:10.1134/S1990519X15020121
Acknowledgments
The authors thank J. Ellenberg and M. Cardoso, who kindly provided plasmids for this work. This research was partially supported by the Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (RVO: 68378050 to PH), the Grant agency of the Czech Republic (16-03403S to PH), Russian Fund for Basic Research (Grants 13-04-00885 and 15-54-78077 to IIK) and Moscow State university Development Program (PNR 5.13).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhironkina, O.A., Kurchashova, S.Y., Pozharskaia, V.A. et al. Mechanisms of nuclear lamina growth in interphase. Histochem Cell Biol 145, 419–432 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-016-1419-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-016-1419-6