Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Macular hole with epiretinal proliferation: diagnostic value of en-face optical coherence tomography and clinical characteristics

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To elucidate the clinical features and surgical outcomes of full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) with epiretinal proliferation (EP) diagnosed by both en-face and B-mode optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Method

This retrospective cohort study classified idiopathic FTMHs into two groups, based on B-scan and en-face OCT imaging: FTMH with EP (EP group) and without EP (non-EP group). The preoperative features, as well as postoperative outcomes up to 12 months, were compared between the two groups.

Result

Among 318 eyes of idiopathic FTMH that met the inclusion criteria, 59 eyes (18.6%) were in the EP group, and others were in the non-EP group. In 9 eyes (15.3%) out of the EP group, EP was not detected in the preoperative B-mode OCT but was identified through the en-face OCT. Baseline features showed a higher male proportion (47.5% vs. 27.8%, P = 0.005) and a lower incidence of vitreofoveal traction (P < 0.001) in the EP group than in the non-EP group. The EP group showed worse visual recovery than the non-EP group (− 0.23 vs. − 0.41 logarithm of the minimum angle of the resolution at 12 months, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

The en-face OCT enhances diagnostic accuracy of EP in FTMH eyes, especially in the case with smaller extent of EP. Eyes with FTMH with EP showed a worse visual recovery than FTMH without EP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frisina R, Pilotto E, Midena E (2019) Lamellar macular hole: state of the art. Ophthalmic Res 61:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1159/000494687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schumann RG, Hagenau F, Guenther SR, Wolf A, Priglinger SG, Vogt D (2019) Premacular cell proliferation profiles in tangential traction vitreo-maculopathies suggest a key role for hyalocytes. Ophthalmologica 242:106–112. https://doi.org/10.1159/000495853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asaad SZ (2020) Lamellar macular holes: evolving concepts and propensity for progression to full thickness macular hole. Int J Retin Vitreous 6:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-020-00252-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Compera D, Schumann RG, Cereda MG, Acquistapace A, Lita V, Priglinger SG, Staurenghi G, Bottoni F (2018) Progression of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation and retinal changes during long-term follow-up. Br J Ophthalmol 102:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-310128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsai CY, Hsieh YT, Yang CM (2016) Epiretinal membrane-induced full-thickness macular holes: the clinical features and surgical outcomes. Retina 36:1679–1687. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bae K, Lee SM, Kang SW, Kim ES, Yu SY, Kim KT (2019) Atypical epiretinal tissue in full-thickness macular holes: pathogenic and prognostic significance. Br J Ophthalmol 103:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hwang S, Kang SW (2022) The clinical and pathogenic significance of atypical epiretinal tissue in macular hole. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260:2791–2798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05750-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leitgeb RA (2019) En face optical coherence tomography: a technology review [Invited]. Biomed Opt Express 10:2177–2201. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.002177

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eun JS, Choi YJ, Kang SW, Choi KJ, Kim SJ, Roh HC (2022) En-face imaging of atypical epiretinal tissue in lamellar macular hole. Retina 42:298–305. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000003303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Uchino E, Uemura A, Ohba N (2001) Initial stages of posterior vitreous detachment in healthy eyes of older persons evaluated by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1475–1479. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.10.1475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim JH, Kang SW, Kim YT, Kim SJ, Chung SE (2013) Partial posterior hyaloidectomy for macular disorders. Eye (Lond) 27:946–951. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2013.117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee Kim E, Weiner AJ, Ung C, Roh M, Wang J, Lee IJ, Huang NT, Stem M, Dahrouj M, Eliott D, Vavvas DG, Young LHY, Williams GA, Garretson BR, Kim IK, Hassan TS, Mukai S, Ruby AJ, Faia LJ, Capone A Jr, Comander J, Kim LA, Wu DM, Drenser KA, Woodward MA, Wolfe JD, Yonekawa Y (2019) Characterization of epiretinal proliferation in full-thickness macular holes and effects on surgical outcomes. Ophthalmol Retina 3:694–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2019.03.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi H, Inoue M, Itoh Y, Koto T, Hirota K, Kita Y, Hirakata A (2020) Macular dehiscence-associated epiretinal proliferation in eyes with full-thickness macular hole. Retina 40:273–281. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000002366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Itoh Y, Levison AL, Kaiser PK, Srivastava SK, Singh RP, Ehlers JP (2016) Prevalence and characteristics of hyporeflective preretinal tissue in vitreomacular interface disorders. Br J Ophthalmol 100:399–404. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ubukata Y, Imai H, Otsuka K, Nishizaki M, Hara R, Uenishi M, Azumi A, Nakamura M (2017) The comparison of the surgical outcome for the full-thickness macular hole with/without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation. J Ophthalmol 2017:9640756. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9640756

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishida Y, Tsuboi K, Wakabayashi T, Baba K, Kamei M (2023) En face OCT detects preretinal abnormal tissues before and after internal limiting membrane peeling in eyes with macular hole. Ophthalmology Retina 7:153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2022.08.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fung AT, Galvin J, Tran T (2021) Epiretinal membrane: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 49:289–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Govetto A, Dacquay Y, Farajzadeh M, Platner E, Hirabayashi K, Hosseini H, Schwartz SD, Hubschman JP (2016) Lamellar macular hole: two distinct clinical entities? Am J Ophthalmol 164:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, Schaumberger M, Ulbig MW, Kampik A (2002) Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 86:390–393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.4.390

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kusuhara S, Negi A (2014) Predicting visual outcome following surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Ophthalmologica 231:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1159/000355492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chung SE, Lim DH, Kang SW, Yoon YH, Chae JB, Roh IH (2010) Central photoreceptor viability and prediction of visual outcome in patients with idiopathic macular holes. Korean J Ophthalmol 24:213–218. https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2010.24.4.213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zampedri E, Romanelli F, Semeraro F, Parolini B, Frisina R (2017) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings in idiopathic lamellar macular hole. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255:699–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3545-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fraser-Bell S, Guzowski M, Rochtchina E, Wang JJ, Mitchell P (2003) Five-year cumulative incidence and progression of epiretinal membranes: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 110:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01443-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson MW (2010) Posterior vitreous detachment: evolution and complications of its early stages. Am J Ophthalmol 149(371–382):e371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.11.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Park JH, Yang H, Kwon H, Jeon S (2021) Risk factors for onset or progression of posterior vitreous detachment at the vitreomacular interface after cataract surgery. Ophthalmol Retina 5:270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2020.07.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Panozzo G, Mercanti A (2004) Optical coherence tomography findings in myopic traction maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 122:1455–1460. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.122.10.1455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gaucher D, Haouchine B, Tadayoni R, Massin P, Erginay A, Benhamou N, Gaudric A (2007) Long-term follow-up of high myopic foveoschisis: natural course and surgical outcome. Am J Ophthalmol 143:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.10.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. dell’Omo R, Virgili G, Bottoni F, Parolini B, De Turris S, Di Salvatore A, dell’Omo E, Costagliola C (2018) Lamellar macular holes in the eyes with pathological myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256:1281–1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3995-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin CW, Ho TC, Yang CM (2015) The development and evolution of full thickness macular hole in highly myopic eyes. Eye (Lond) 29:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.312

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Miraftab M, Emamian MH, Shariati M, Abdolahinia T, Fotouhi A (2012) The distribution of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and vitreous chamber depth in an adult population of Shahroud, Iran. BMC Ophthalmol 12:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-12-50

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ali FS, Stein JD, Blachley TS, Ackley S, Stewart JM (2017) Incidence of and risk factors for developing idiopathic macular hole among a diverse group of patients throughout the United States. JAMA Ophthalmol 135:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5870

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Choi JH, Kim KT, Kang SW, Bae K, Lee SE, Kim AY (2020) Development of idiopathic macular hole in fellow eyes: spectral domain optical coherence tomography features. Retina 40:765–772. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000002439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cho HY, Kim YT, Kang SW (2006) Laser photocoagulation as adjuvant therapy to surgery for large macular holes. Korean J Ophthalmol 20:93–98. https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2006.20.2.93

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Chehaibou I, Hubschman JP, Kasi S, Su D, Joseph A, Prasad P, Abbey AM, Gaudric A, Tadayoni R, Rahimy E (2021) Spontaneous conversion of lamellar macular holes to full-thickness macular holes: clinical features and surgical outcomes. Ophthalmol Retina 5:1009–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2020.12.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. dell’Omo R, Virgili G, Rizzo S, De Turris S, Coclite G, Giorgio D, dell’Omo E, Costagliola C (2017) Role of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation in lamellar macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol 175:16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concepts and design: Se Woong Kang, Jaehwan Choi. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data: Jaehwan Choi, Sungsoon Hwang, Ki Young Son. Drafting of the manuscript: Jaehwan Choi. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Se Woong Kang, San Jin Kim. Administration, technical, or material support: Se Woong Kang. Supervision: Se Woong Kang.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Se Woong Kang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This research followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. Informed consent was waived by the board as the research was retrospective, anonymous, and presented no threat to the rights and welfare of the research participants.

Consent for publication

All authors are in agreement with the content of the manuscript and have approved the final manuscript for submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, J., Kim, S.J., Kang, S.W. et al. Macular hole with epiretinal proliferation: diagnostic value of en-face optical coherence tomography and clinical characteristics. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06446-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06446-5

Keywords

Navigation