Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical features of idiopathic epiretinal membrane in children and the factors influencing postoperative visual acuity

  • Pediatrics
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the characteristics and surgical outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) in children and to determine the factors associated with postoperative visual acuity (VA).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 17 patients with iERM (age, < 18 years) who had undergone ERM surgery from 2009 to 2021. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography features were documented. The eyes with iERMs involving the fovea were assigned to the localized and diffused groups depending on the morphological description of the membrane. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the factors associated with the final VA.

Results

The mean age was 9.2 ± 3.8 years. The mean follow-up period was 38.9 ± 45.4 months. After surgery, the central foveal thickness and the best-corrected VA (BCVA) improved significantly (all, P < 0.05). Fourteen eyes with iERMs showed involvement of the foveal area (localized group, six eyes; diffused group, eight eyes). There were no significant differences in the preoperative BCVA between the two groups (P = 0.064). However, the final BCVA was better in the diffused group than in the localized group (P = 0.043). Multiple regression analysis indicated that the localized membrane (P = 0.042) and lower preoperative BCVA (P = 0.043) were factors associated with a worse final VA in pediatric iERMs.

Conclusions

Surgical removal of ERM showed a high anatomical and functional success rate in children. In pediatric patients with iERMs involving the fovea, a good VA was more common when the membrane was diffused than when it was localized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST, Fawzi A, Lim JI, Vemulakonda GA, Ying GS (2020) Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane and Vitreomacular Traction Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology 127:145–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bu SC, Kuijer R, Li XR, Hooymans JM, Los LI (2014) Idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Retina 34:2317–2335. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. González-Saldivar G, Berger A, Wong D, Juncal V, Chow DR (2020) Ectopic inner foveal layer classification scheme predicts visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina 40:710–717. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fincham GS, James S, Spickett C, Hollingshead M, Thrasivoulou C, Poulson AV, McNinch A, Richards A, Snead D, Limb GA, Snead MP (2018) Posterior vitreous detachment and the posterior hyaloid membrane. Ophthalmology 125:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bringmann A, Unterlauft JD, Barth T, Wiedemann R, Rehak M, Wiedemann P (2021) Foveal configurations with disappearance of the foveal pit in eyes with macular pucker: Presumed role of Müller cells in the formation of foveal herniation. Exp Eye Res 207:108604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2021.108604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khaja HA, McCannel CA, Diehl NN, Mohney BG (2008) Incidence and clinical characteristics of epiretinal membranes in children. Arch Ophthalmol 126:632–636. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.5.632

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrone PJ, Chaudhary KM (2012) Macular epiretinal membrane peeling treatment outcomes in young children. Retina 32:530–536. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0B013E318233AD26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wise GN (1975) Congenital preretinal macular fibrosis. Am J Ophthalmol 79:363–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(75)90607-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smiddy WE, Michels RG, Gilbert HD, Green WR (1992) Clinicopathologic study of idiopathic macular pucker in children and young adults. Retina 12:232–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-199212030-00005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Govetto A, Lalane RA 3rd, Sarraf D, Figueroa MS, Hubschman JP (2017) Insights Into Epiretinal Membranes: Presence of Ectopic Inner Foveal Layers and a New Optical Coherence Tomography Staging Scheme. Am J Ophthalmol 175:99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonnin S, Metge F, Guez A, Edelson C, Dureau P, Caputo G (2016) Long-term outcome of epiretinal membrane surgery in young children. Retina 36:558–564. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Benhamou N, Massin P, Spolaore R, Paques M, Gaudric A (2002) Surgical management of epiretinal membrane in young patients. Am J Ophthalmol 133:358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01422-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang X, Chen Z, Weng Y, Shu Z, Ni H, Jiang J, Yao K (2008) Surgical outcome after removal of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane in young patients. Eye (Lond) 22:1430–1435. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Banach MJ, Hassan TS, Cox MS, Margherio RR, Williams GA, Garretson BR, Trese MT (2001) Clinical course and surgical treatment of macular epiretinal membranes in young subjects. Ophthalmology 108:23–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00473-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Park DW, Dugel PU, Garda J, Sipperley JO, Thach A, Sneed SR, Blaisdell J (2003) Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. Ophthalmology 110:62–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01440-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwok AKh, Lai TY, Yuen KS (2005) Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 33:379–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.01015.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China, Grant/ Award Number: 2017YFA0104103.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wu Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were adhered to the Helsinki declaration and its lateral amendments. Approval was granted by the ethical review committee of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Consent to publish

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest with regard to the article.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, X., Mo, B., Yu, Y. et al. Clinical features of idiopathic epiretinal membrane in children and the factors influencing postoperative visual acuity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 261, 3651–3657 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06156-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06156-4

Keywords

Navigation