Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of scleral thickness in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy

  • Cornea
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate scleral thickness using anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) and compare the results with healthy individuals.

Methods

Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients with FED and 30 eyes of 30 age, gender, spherical equivalent and axial length matched healthy participants were included. All subjects underwent a detailed ophthalmological examination including endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements. Scleral thickness was measured by AS-OCT (Swept Source-OCT, Triton,Topcon,Japan) in 4 quadrants (superior, inferior, nasal, temporal) from 6 mm posterior to the scleral spur.

Results

The mean ages were 62.5 ± 13.2 (33–81) for FED group; 64 ± 8.1 (48–81) for control group. CCT was significantly greater in FED group than in the control group (586.8 ± 33.1 (514–635) vs 545.0 ± 20.7 (503–587), respectively)(p = 0.000). In FED group, mean scleral thickness in the superior, inferior, nasal and temporal quadrants were 434.0 ± 30.6 (371–498), 442.8 ± 27.6 (395–502), 447.7 ± 31.4 (382–502), 443.4 ± 30.3 (386–504) μm, respectively. In control group, the mean scleral thickness in the superior, inferior, nasal and temporal quadrants were 381.3 ± 20.0 (341–436), 383.2 ± 16.0 (352–436), 389.2 ± 21.0 (353–440), 383.2 ± 19.2 (349–440) µm, respectively. The mean scleral thickness was significantly higher in all quadrants in FED group than in control group (p = 0.000).

Conclusion

In patients with FED, scleral thickness was significantly higher. FED is a progressive corneal disease that results in the accumulation of extracellular material in the cornea. These findings suggest that the accumulation of extracellular deposits may not be limited to the cornea. Due to their functional similarity and anatomical proximity, sclera may also be affected in FED.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eghrari AO, McGlumphy EJ, Iliff BW, Wang J, Emmert D, Riazuddin SA et al (2012) Prevalence and severity of fuchs corneal dystrophy in Tangier Island. Am J Ophthalmol 153:1067–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.11.033

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Nanda GG, Alone DP (2019) REVIEW: Current understanding of the pathogenesis of Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy. Mol Vis 25:295–310

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Syed ZA, Tran JA, Jurkunas UV (2017) Peripheral endothelial cell count is a predictor of disease severity in advanced Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Cornea 36:1166–1171. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001292

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Repp DJ, Hodge DO, Baratz KH, McLaren JW, Patel SV (2013) Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy: subjective grading versus objective grading based on the central-to-peripheral thickness ratio. Ophthalmology 120:687–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Korkmaz I, Barut Selver O, Palamar M (2021) Evaluation of descemet membrane thickness with anterior segment optical coherence tomography and comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with different devices in Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Turkiye Klin J Ophthalmol 30:17–23. https://doi.org/10.5336/ophthal.2020-75876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iovino C, Fossarello M, Giannaccare G, Pellegrini M, Braghiroli M, Demarinis G et al (2018) Corneal endothelium features in Fuchs’ Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: a preliminary 3D anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. PLoS One 13:e0207891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yasukura Y, Oie Y, Kawasaki R, Maeda N, Jhanji V, Nishida K (2021) New severity grading system for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol 99:e914–e921. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Imanaga N, Terao N, Nakamine S, Tamashiro T, Wakugawa S, Sawaguchi K et al (2021) Scleral thickness in central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmol Retina 5:285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2020.07.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feizi S (2018) Corneal endothelial cell dysfunction: etiologies and management. Ther Adv Ophthalmol 10:2515841418815802. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515841418815802

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kopplin LJ, Przepyszny K, Schmotzer B, Rudo K, Babineau DC, Patel SV et al (2012) Relationship of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy severity to central corneal thickness. Arch Ophthalmol 130:433–439. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.1626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adamis AP, Filatov V, Tripathi BJ, Tripathi RC (1993) Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy of the cornea. Surv Ophthalmol 38:149–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(93)90099-s

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Y, Cao H (2022) Corneal and scleral biomechanics in ophthalmic diseases: an updated review. Med Nov Technol Devices 15:100140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medntd.2022.10014013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gökmen O, Yeşilırmak N, Akman A, GürGüngör S, Yücel AE, Yeşil H et al (2017) Corneal, scleral, choroidal, and foveal thickness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Turkish J Ophthalmol 47:315–319. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.58712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sawaguchi S, Terao N, Imanaga N, Wakugawa S, Tamashiro T, Yamauchi Y et al (2022) Scleral thickness in steroid-induced central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmol Sci 2:100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Buckhurst HD, Gilmartin B, Cubbidge RP, Logan NS (2015) Measurement of scleral thickness in humans using anterior segment optical coherent tomography. PLoS ONE 28(10):e0132902–e0132902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Han SB, Liu Y-C, Noriega KM, Mehta JS (2016) Applications of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in cornea and ocular surface diseases. J Ophthalmol 2016:4971572. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4971572

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shan J, DeBoer C, Xu BY (2019) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography: applications for clinical care and scientific research. Asia-Pacific J Ophthalmol.https://doi.org/10.22608/APO.201910

  18. Ang M, Baskaran M, Werkmeister RM, Chua J, Schmidl D, Aranha Dos Santos V et al (2018) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res 66:132–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.04.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meek KM (2008) The Cornea and Sclera BT. In: Fratzl P (ed) Collagen: Structure and Mechanics. Springer, Boston, pp 359–396

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Schlatter B, Beck M, Frueh BE, Tappeiner C, Zinkernagel M (2015) Evaluation of scleral and corneal thickness in keratoconus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.08.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee YJ, Lee YJ, Lee JY, Lee S (2021) A pilot study of scleral thickness in central serous chorioretinopathy using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Sci Rep 11:5872. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85229-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melis Palamar.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ege University Committee of Ethics (Project number: 21–12.1 T/29) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korkmaz, I., Degirmenci, C., Selver, O.B. et al. Evaluation of scleral thickness in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 261, 2883–2889 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06107-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06107-z

Keywords

Navigation