Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical outcomes after implantation of extended depth-of-focus AcrySof® Vivity® intraocular lens in eyes with low-grade epiretinal membrane

  • Cataract
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) AcrySof® Vivity® intraocular lens in eyes with low-grade epiretinal membrane (ERM).

Methods

Forty-five eyes with low-grade ERM and history of Vivity implantation were compared with 50 age-matched controls with Vivity implantation and no ERM. Eyes with ERM showing widening of the outer nuclear layer and loss of the foveal depression, but no ectopic inner foveal layer or outer retinal defect were eligible. Corrected and uncorrected distant visual acuity (CDVA and UDVA), uncorrected intermediate and near visual acuity (UIVA and UNVA), contrast sensitivity detected by area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF), Strehl ratio, area ratio, and occurrence of dysphotopsia were compared between groups.

Results

UDVA and CDVA were similar between groups (UDVA: 0.01 ± 0.05 vs 0.03 ± 0.06, P = 0.154; CDVA: 0.00 ± 0.00 vs 0.00 ± 0.02, P = 0.125). UIVA and mesopic AULCSF were significantly worse in eyes with ERM compared to those with no ERM (UIVA: 0.09 ± 0.09 vs 0.14 ± 0.10, P = 0.028; mesopic AULCSF: 1.26 ± 0.15 vs 1.17 ± 0.10, P = 0.013). The occurrence of dysphotopsia was similar in both groups (glare: P = 0.465; halo: P = 0.218; starburst: P = 0.457).

Discussion

Eyes with low-grade ERM showed comparable outcomes to eyes without ERM after Vivity IOL implantation. Implantation of this newly developed EDoF IOL with low addition can be of benefit to eyes with low-grade, reversible ERM that is limited to the inner retina.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braga-Mele R, Chang D, Dewey S, Foster G, Henderson BA, Hill W, Hoffman R, Little B, Mamalis N, Oetting T, Serafano D, Talley-Rostov A, Vasavada A, Yoo S, Cataract Clinical Committee ASCRS (2014) Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:313–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koizumi H, Spaide RF, Fisher YL, Freund KB, Klancnik JM Jr, Yannuzzi LA (2008) Three-dimensional evaluation of vitreomacular traction and epiretinal membrane using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 145:509–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim B, Kwon S, Choi A, Jeon S (2021) Influence of mild non-foveal involving epiretinal membrane on visual quality in eyes with multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 259:2723–2730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim B, Choi A, Park JH, Jeon S (2021) Prevalence of epiretinal membrane in the phakic eyes based on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. PLoS One 6:e0245063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shimozono M, Oishi A, Hata M, Matsuki T, Ito S, Ishida K, Kurimoto Y (2012) The significance of cone outer segment tips as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 153:698–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeon S, Jung B, Lee WK (2018) Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Findings in Patients With Macropsia. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 49:656–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Govetto A, Lalane RA 3rd, Sarraf D, Figueroa MS, Hubschman JP (2017) Insights into epiretinal membranes: presence of ectopic inner foveal layers and a new optical coherence tomography staging scheme. Am J Ophthalmol 175:99–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeon S, Jung B, Lee WK (2019) Long-term prognostic factors for visual improvement after epiretinal membrane removal. Retina 39:1786–1793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmid R, Borkenstein AF (2022) Analysis of higher order aberrations in recently developed wavefront-shaped IOLs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260:609–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arrigo A, Gambaro G, Fasce F, Aragona E, Figini I, Bandello F (2021) Extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) AcrySof® IQ Vivity® intraocular lens implant: a real-life experience. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 259:2717–2722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Amelsfort T, Webers VSC, Bauer NJC, Clement LHH, van den Biggelaar FJHM, Nuijts RMMA (2022) Visual outcomes of a new nondiffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeted for minimonovision: 3-month results of a prospective cohort study. J Cataract Refract Surg 48:151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kohnen T, Petermann K, Böhm M, Hemkeppler E, Ahmad W, Hinzelmann L, Pawlowicz K, Jandewerth T, Lwowski C (2022) Nondiffractive wavefront-shaping extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: visual performance and patient-reported outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 48:144–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozulken K, Kiziltoprak H, Yuksel E, Mumcuoğlu T (2021) A comparative evaluation of diffractive trifocal and new refractive/extended depth of focus intraocular lenses for refractive lens exchange. Curr Eye Res 46:811–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi A, Kwon H, Jeon S (2021) Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length. Sci Rep 11:7346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ouchi M, Kinoshita S (2015) Implantation of refractive multifocal intraocular lens with a surface-embedded near section for cataract eyes complicated with a coexisting ocular pathology. Eye (Lond) 29:649–655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Patel SB, Snyder ME, Riemann CD, Foster RE, Sisk RA (2019) Short-term outcomes of combined pars plana vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane and phacoemulsification surgery with multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Clin Ophthalmol 13:723–730

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P, Tuuminen R (2020) Multifocal intraocular lenses and retinal diseases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258:805–813

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sánchez-Sánchez C, Rementería-Capelo LA, Puerto B, López-Caballero C, Morán A, Sánchez-Pina JM, Contreras I (2021) Visual function and patient satisfaction with multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with glaucoma and dry age-related macular degeneration. J Ophthalmol 10(2021):9935983

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hwang JU, Sohn J, Moon BG, Joe SG, Lee JY, Kim JG, Yoon YH (2012) Assessment of macular function for idiopathic epiretinal membranes classified by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:3562–3569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li D, Horiguchi M, Kishi S (2004) Tomographic and multifocal electroretinographic features of idiopathic epimacular membranes. Arch Ophthalmol 122:1462–1467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Forshaw TRJ, Parpounas AK, Sørensen TL (2021) Correlation of macular sensitivity measures and visual acuity to vision-related quality of life in patients with age-related macular degeneration. BMC Ophthalmol 21:149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohee Jeon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The research was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee of Keye Eye Center (IRB number P12362204-002).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 26 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeon, S., Choi, A. & Kwon, H. Clinical outcomes after implantation of extended depth-of-focus AcrySof® Vivity® intraocular lens in eyes with low-grade epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 3883–3888 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05751-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05751-1

Keywords

Navigation