Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical findings in acute posterior vitreous detachment

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the typical presentation of acute posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), including demographics and prevalence of various treatable findings in the same and fellow eye.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of medical records from 2346 patients with acute PVD. Descriptive statistics were generated on age, sex, contact date, visual acuity, and slit lamp, and fundoscopy findings. Multivariate regressions were used to generate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to quantify associations between variables.

Results

A total of 4692 eyes from 2346 patients were analyzed. Most patients were female (60.5%) with an average age of 62.8 years old. Overall, 605 patients (25.8%) had any additional ocular finding on fundus exam, including pigmentation (N = 184, 7.8%), lattice degeneration (N = 158, 6.7%), tear (N = 131, 5.6%), and hole (N = 131, 5.2%). Unilateral retinal detachment was present in 26 patients (1.1%), and these patients demonstrated a similar rate (26.9%) of additional ocular findings compared to the entire sample size. Female sex (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03–1.43, p = 0.020) was independently associated with presentation during spring or summer.

Conclusion

Acute PVD is associated with a number of risk factors and peripheral lesions. These findings may be useful in treating and predicting the course and development of PVD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available upon request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Johnson MW (2010) Posterior vitreous detachment: evolution and complications of its early stages. Am J Ophthalmol 149(371–382):e371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.11.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bond-Taylor M, Jakobsson G, Zetterberg M (2017) Posterior vitreous detachment - prevalence of and risk factors for retinal tears. Clin Ophthalmol 11:1689–1695. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S143898

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Richardson PS, Benson MT, Kirkby GR (1999) The posterior vitreous detachment clinic: do new retinal breaks develop in the six weeks following an isolated symptomatic posterior vitreous detachment? Eye (Lond) 13(Pt 2):237–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1999.58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST, Fawzi A, Lim JI, Vemulakonda GA, Ying GS (2020) Posterior vitreous detachment, retinal breaks, and lattice degeneration preferred practice pattern (R). Ophthalmology 127:P146–P181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed F, Tripathy K (2021) Posterior vitreous detachment StatPearls, Treasure Island

  6. Rahman R, Ikram K, Rosen PH, Cortina-Borja M, Taylor ME (2002) Do climatic variables influence the development of posterior vitreous detachment? Br J Ophthalmol 86:829. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.7.829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Iida M, Horiguchi H, Katagiri S, Shirakashi Y, Yamada Y, Gunji H, Nakano T (2021) Association of meteorological factors with the frequency of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Japan. Sci Rep 11:9559. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88979-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mansour AM, Hamam RN, Sibai TA, Farah TI, Mehio-Sibai A, Kanaan M (2009) Seasonal variation of retinal detachment in Lebanon. Ophthalmic Res 41:170–174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000210443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thelen U, Gerding H, Clemens S (1997) Rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Seasonal variation and incidence. Ophthalmologe 94:638–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003470050174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chuo JY, Lee TY, Hollands H, Morris AH, Reyes RC, Rossiter JD, Meredith SP, Maberley DA (2006) Risk factors for posterior vitreous detachment: a case-control study. Am J Ophthalmol 142:931–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karahan E, Karti O, Er D, Cam D, Aydın R, Zengin MO, Kaynak S (2018) Risk factors for multiple retinal tears in patients with acute posterior vitreous detachment. Int Ophthalmol 38:257–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0455-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seider MI, Conell C, Melles RB (2022) Complications of acute posterior vitreous detachment. Ophthalmology 129:67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.07.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA (2007) Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1633–1644. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. StataCorp (2019) Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seider MI, Conell C, Melles RB (2021) Complications of acute posterior vitreous detachment. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.07.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanner V, Harle D, Tan J, Foote B, Williamson TH, Chignell AH (2000) Acute posterior vitreous detachment: the predictive value of vitreous pigment and symptomatology. Br J Ophthalmol 84:1264–1268. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.84.11.1264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Uhr JH, Obeid A, Wibbelsman TD, Wu CM, Levin HJ, Garrigan H, Spirn MJ, Chiang A, Sivalingam A, Hsu J (2020) Delayed retinal breaks and detachments after acute posterior vitreous detachment. Ophthalmology 127:516–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Coffee RE, Westfall AC, Davis GH, Mieler WF, Holz ER (2007) Symptomatic posterior vitreous detachment and the incidence of delayed retinal breaks: case series and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 144:409–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dayan MR, Jayamanne DG, Andrews RM, Griffiths PG (1996) Flashes and floaters as predictors of vitreoretinal pathology: is follow-up necessary for posterior vitreous detachment? Eye (Lond) 10(Pt 4):456–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1996.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization and data acquisition were done by Jay Chhablani. Data analysis and original draft preparation were performed by Matthew Driban. All the authors contributed to review and editing. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay Chhablani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This retrospective research study was reviewed by the IRB of the University of Pittsburgh and determined to meet regulatory requirements for exempt research.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Driban, M., Chhablani, J. Clinical findings in acute posterior vitreous detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 3465–3469 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05708-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05708-4

Keywords

Navigation