Abstract
Purpose
The study aims to compare outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in keratoconic eyes with or without previous hydrops.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of 211 eyes who received PK (group 1, n = 74 [history of hydrops: n = 33]) or DALK (group 2, n = 137 [history of hydrops: n = 9]) from 2012 to 2019 at the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Germany. Analysis included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), complications, immune reactions, graft survival and keratometry, and subgroup analyses for subjects with or without previous hydrops.
Results
Follow-up was 34.0 ± 23.6 months in group 1 and 30.7 ± 22.5 months in group 2. No significant difference was found in the course of BSCVA between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.182) and in postoperative BSCVA between eyes with and without previous hydrops, regardless of the surgical method (p = 0.768). Endothelial immune reactions occurred exclusively in group 1 and did not occur more frequently in eyes with previous hydrops (p = 0.377). A higher risk of complications for eyes with previous hydrops was observed (p = 0.022). There was no difference in astigmatism and maximum keratometry (Kmax) preoperatively and postoperatively between eyes with and without history of hydrops.
Conclusion
The prognosis for visual outcome after keratoplasty including visual acuity, astigmatism, and Kmax for keratoconic eyes with previous hydrops is as good as for keratoconic eyes without previous hydrops, irrespective of the surgical method. However, eyes after hydrops seem to have an increased risk of complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
From the patient data of the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Matthaei M, Sandhaeger H, Hermel M, Adler W, Jun AS, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM (2017) Changing indications in penetrating keratoplasty: a systematic review of 34 years of global reporting. Transplantation 101:1387–1399. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001281
Anwar M, Teichmann KD (2002) Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet’s membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01181-6
Reinhart WJ, Musch DC, Jacobs DS, Lee WB, Kaufman SC, Shtein RM (2011) Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 118:209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.11.002
Cursiefen C, Schaub F, Bachmann B (2016) Update: deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus. When, how and why. Ophthalmologe 113:204–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-015-0204-6
Flockerzi E, Maier P, Bohringer D, Reinshagen H, Kruse F, Cursiefen C, Reinhard T, Geerling G, Torun N, Seitz B, all German Keratoplasty Registry C (2018) Trends in corneal transplantation from 2001 to 2016 in Germany: a report of the DOG-section cornea and its keratoplasty registry. Am J Ophthalmol 188:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.018
MacIntyre R, Chow SP, Chan E, Poon A (2014) Long-term outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Australian keratoconus patients. Cornea 33:6–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a9fbfd
Han DC, Mehta JS, Por YM, Htoon HM, Tan DT (2009) Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 148:744-751 e741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.05.028
Feizi S, Javadi MA, Kheiri B (2019) Effect of keratoconus severity on clinical outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 207:431–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.011
Nanavaty MA, Daya SM (2012) Outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconic eyes with previous hydrops. Br J Ophthalmol 96:1304–1309. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302110
Romano V, Iovieno A, Parente G, Soldani AM, Fontana L (2015) Long-term clinical outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 159:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.11.033
Steven P, Le Blanc C, Lankenau E, Krug M, Oelckers S, Heindl LM, Gehlsen U, Huettmann G, Cursiefen C (2014) Optimising deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) using intraoperative online optical coherence tomography (iOCT). Br J Ophthalmol 98:900–904. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304585
Basu S, Vaddavalli PK, Ramappa M, Shah S, Murthy SI, Sangwan VS (2011) Intracameral perfluoropropane gas in the treatment of acute corneal hydrops. Ophthalmology 118:934–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.030
Bachmann B, Händel A, Siebelmann S, Matthaei M, Cursiefen C (2019) Mini-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for the early treatment of acute corneal hydrops in keratoconus. Cornea 38:1043–1048. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002001
Siebelmann S, Handel A, Matthaei M, Bachmann B, Cursiefen C (2019) Microscope-integrated optical coherence tomography-guided drainage of acute corneal hydrops in keratoconus combined with suturing and gas-aided reattachment of Descemet membrane. Cornea 38:1058–1061. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001958
Händel A, Siebelmann S, Hos D, Ogrunc F, Matthaei M, Cursiefen C, Bachmann B (2021) Comparison of Mini-DMEK versus predescemetal sutures as treatment of acute hydrops in keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol 99:e1326–e1333. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14835
Khattak A, Nakhli FR, Al-Arfaj KM, Cheema AA (2018) Comparison of outcomes and complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty performed in a large group of patients with keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol 38:985–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0548-9
Meyer JJ, Gokul A, Crawford AZ, McGhee CNJ (2016) Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus with and without resolved corneal hydrops: long-term results. Am J Ophthalmol 169:282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.001
Basu S, Reddy JC, Vaddavalli PK, Vemuganti GK, Sangwan VS (2012) Long-term outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus with resolved corneal hydrops. Cornea 31:615–620. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823d03e3
Schaub F, Heindl LM, Enders P, Roters S, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C (2017) Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty : experiences and results of the first 100 consecutive DALK from the University Eye Hospital of Cologne. Ophthalmologe 114:1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-016-0424-4
Hoffmann F (1978) Cross-stitch suture in perforating keratoplasty (author’s transl). Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 173:696–700
Riss S, Heindl LM, Bachmann BO, Kruse FE, Cursiefen C (2012) Pentacam-based big bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Cornea 31:627–632. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f8c85
Javadi MA, Feizi S, Moein HR (2013) Simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty and cataract surgery. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 8:39–46
Bleriot A, Martin E, Lebranchu P, Zimmerman K, Libeau L, Weber M, Vabres B, Orignac I (2017) Comparison of 12-month anatomic and functional results between Z6 femtosecond laser-assisted and manual trephination in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for advanced keratoconus. J Fr Ophtalmol 40:e193–e200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2017.05.002
Panda A, Sethi HS, Jain M, Nindra Krishna S, Gupta AK (2011) Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:122–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.031
Kodavoor SK, Deb B, Ramamurthy D (2018) Outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty patients with intraoperative Descemet’s membrane perforation: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Indian J Ophthalmol 66:1574–1579. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_282_18
Hos D, Matthaei M, Bock F, Maruyama K, Notara M, Clahsen T, Hou Y, Le VNH, Salabarria AC, Horstmann J, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C (2019) Immune reactions after modern lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus conventional penetrating corneal transplantation. Prog Retin Eye Res 73:100768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.07.001
Bock F, Maruyama K, Regenfuss B, Hos D, Steven P, Heindl LM, Cursiefen C (2013) Novel anti(lymph)angiogenic treatment strategies for corneal and ocular surface diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res 34:89–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.01.001
Hos D, Bukowiecki A, Horstmann J, Bock F, Bucher F, Heindl LM, Siebelmann S, Steven P, Dana R, Eming SA, Cursiefen C (2017) Transient ingrowth of lymphatic vessels into the physiologically avascular cornea regulates corneal edema and transparency. Sci Rep 7:7227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07806-4
Dietrich T, Bock F, Yuen D, Hos D, Bachmann BO, Zahn G, Wiegand S, Chen L, Cursiefen C (2010) Cutting edge: lymphatic vessels, not blood vessels, primarily mediate immune rejections after transplantation. J Immunol 184:535–539. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0903180
Cursiefen C, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Kuchle M, Sorokin L, Breiteneder-Geleff S, Alitalo K, Jackson D (2002) Lymphatic vessels in vascularized human corneas: immunohistochemical investigation using LYVE-1 and podoplanin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2127–2135
Funding
German Research Foundation (DFG) FOR2240 “(Lymph)angiogenesis and Cellular Immunity in Inflammatory Diseases of the Eye” (www.for2240.de); EU Horizon 2020 ARREST BLINDNESS (CC; www.arrestblindness.eu); EU COST CA18116 (CC; www.aniridia-net.eu); and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne (CC, DH; www.cmmc-uni-koeln.de) provided financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Alexander Händel, Jan Niklas Lüke, Sebastian Siebelmann, Deniz Hos, and Jeremy Franklin. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Alexander Händel and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Ethics Committee of the University of Cologne ruled that approval was not required for this study.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Händel, A., Lüke, J.N., Siebelmann, S. et al. Outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconic eyes with and without previous hydrops. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 2913–2923 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05643-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05643-4