Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic value of lumbar puncture for the etiological assessment of uveitis: a retrospective cohort of 188 patients

  • Inflammatory Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To assess the relevance of lumbar puncture (LP) for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis and to establish predictive factors associated with its contributory use.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients with de novo uveitis who were referred to our tertiary hospital for etiological diagnosis of uveitis, between January 2003 and July 2018. We included patients who underwent a LP as part of the etiological assessment of uveitis. LP was considered as contributory if it led to the etiological diagnosis or to correct the initially suspected diagnosis.

Results

One hundred eighty eight of the 1211 patients referred for evaluation (16%) had an LP, among these patients, 93 (49.4%) had abnormal results including 69 (36.7%) patients with hypercellularity, 69 (36.7%) with hyperproteinorachia, and 28 (14.9%) with oligoclonal bands and/or increased IgG index. LP was considered as contributing to the diagnosis in only 31 (16.4%) cases, among which there were 10 (5.3%) contributions to the etiological diagnosis and 21 (11.2%) modifications in the diagnosis classification.

Multivariate analysis established that African ethnicity (p < 0.001), bilateral uveitis (p = 0.01), presence of macular edema or retinal serous detachment (p = 0.048), presence of retinal vasculitis (p < 0.001), presence of neurological signs or symptoms (p = 0.01), and contributing cerebral MRI (p < 0.001) were all significantly associated with a contributory LP. LP did not lead to any therapeutic modification.

Conclusion

LP direct contribution to the diagnosis was rare and most often detected non-specific abnormalities. LP should be performed only in cases of neurological clinical signs or symptoms, suspicion of multiple sclerosis, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada, or syphilis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACE:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme

ASAS:

Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society

BAL:

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)

CBC:

Complete blood cell count

CIS:

Clinical isolated syndrome

CT:

Computerized tomography

LP:

Lumbar puncture

MEWDS:

Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MSGB:

Minor salivary gland biopsy

MS:

Multiple sclerosis

OCL:

Oculocerebral lymphoma

RIS:

Radiologically isolated syndrome

TPHA:

Treponema pallidum hemagglutinations assay

VDRL:

Veneral Disease Research Laboratory

VKH:

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada

References

  1. Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT (2005) Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the First International Workshop. Am J Ophthalmol 140(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.057

  2. Bodaghi B, Cassoux N, Weschler B et al (2001) Chronic severe uveitis: etiology and visual outcome in 927 patients from a single center. Medicine (Baltimore) 80(4):263–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005792-200107000-00005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nussenblatt RB (1990) The natural history of uveitis. Int Ophthalmol 14(5–6):303–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertrand PJ, Jamilloux Y, Ecochard R et al (2019) Uveitis: autoimmunity and beyond. Autoimmun Rev 18(9):102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Selmi C (2014) Diagnosis and classification of autoimmune uveitis. Autoimmun Rev 13(4–5):591–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2014.01.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rothova A, BuitenhuisHJ Meenken C et al (1992) Uveitis and systemic disease. Br J Ophthalmol 76(3):137–141. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.76.3.137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Smit RL, Baarsma GS, De Vries J (1993) Classification of 750 consecutive uveitis patients in the Rotterdam Eye Hospital. Int Ophthalmol 17(2):71–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tran VT, Auer C, Guex-Crosier Y et al (1995) Epidemiological characteristics of uveitis in Switzerland. Int Ophthalmol 18(5):293–298; 1995 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee CS, Randhawa S, Lee AY et al (2016) Patterns of Laboratory testing utilization among uveitis specialists. Am J Ophthalmol 170:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.08.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hadjadj J, Dechartres A, Tetal C (2017) Relevance of diagnostic investigations in patients with uveitis: retrospective cohort study on 300 patients. Autoimmun Rev 16(5):504–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2017.03.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pelegrín L, Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Espinoza G et al (2017) Characterization of isolated retinal vasculitis. Analysis of a cohort from a single center and literature review. Autoimmun Rev 16(3):237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2017.01.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Parisot A, Kodjikian L, Errera MH et al (2017) Randomized controlled trial evaluating a standardized strategy for uveitis etiologic diagnosis (ULISSE). Am J Ophthalmol 178:176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abad S, Terrada C, Trad S et al (2016) Management of uveomeningitis in internal medicine: proposal for a diagnostic work-up. Rev Med Interne 37(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2015.09.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grumet P, Kodjikian L, De Parisot A et al (2018) Contribution of diagnostic tests for the etiological assessment of uveitis, data from the ULISSE study (Uveitis: Clinical and medicoeconomic evaluation of a standardized strategy of the etiological diagnosis). Autoimmun Rev 17(4):331–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2017.10.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Scanff J, Sève P, Kodjikian L et al (2006) Interest of an internist’s consultation in uveitis. Comparative study in 66 cases. Rev Med Interne 27(9):671–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2006.05.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sève P, Cacoub P, Bodaghi B et al (2018) Uveitis: diagnostic work-up. Recommendations from an expert committee. Rev Med Interne 39(9):676–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2017.09.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Criteria for diagnosis of Behçet’s disease (1990) International Study Group for Behçet’s Disease. Lancet 335(8697):1078–1080

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson AJ, Banwell BR, Barkhof F et al (2018) Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 17(2):162–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Okuda DT, Beheshtien U, Mowry EM et al (2009) Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosis: the radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology 72(9):800–805. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000335764.14513.1a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Costabel U, Hunninghake GW (1999) ATS/ERS/WASOG statement on sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Statement Committee. American Thoracic Society. European Respiratory Society. World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders. Eur Respir J 14(4):735–737. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14d02.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zajicek JP, Scolding NJ, Foster O et al (1999) Central nervous system sarcoidosis–diagnosis and management. QJM 92(2):103–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/92.2.103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abad S, Meyssonier V, Allali J et al (2004) Association of peripheral multifocal choroiditis with sarcoidosis: a study of thirty-seven patients. Arthritis Rheum 51(6):974–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rudwaleit M, Van Der Heijde D, Landwé R et al (2011) The assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis 70(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.133645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Read RW, Holland JN, Rao NA et al (2001) Revised diagnostic criteria for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: report of an international committee on nomenclature. Am J Ophthalmol 131(5):647–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(01)00925-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gupta A, Sharma A, Bansal R et al (2015) Classification of intraocular tuberculosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 23(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2014.967358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Evans RW (1998) Complications of lumbar puncture. Neurol Clin 16(1):83–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0733-8619(05)70368-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Le Roux K, Kodjikian L, Marignier R et al (2011) Intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins in patients with unexplained intermediate uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 19(1):26–31. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2010.505357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. University hospital of Nice (2020) Multi-center, randomized, double-blinded study of teriflunomide® in radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) the TERIS study. clinicaltrials.gov. Clinical trial registration NCT03122652, Oct. 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03122652

  29. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (2020) Multi-center, randomized, double-blinded assessment of tecfidera® in extending the time to a first attack in radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) (ARISE). clinicaltrials.gov, Clinical trial registration NCT02739542, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02739542

  30. Lebrun-Frenay C, Kantarci C, Siva A et al (2020) Radiologically isolated syndrome: 10-year risk estimate of a clinical event. Ann Neurol 88(2):407–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tintore M, Rovira A, Rio J et al (2015) Defining high, medium and low impact prognostic factors for developing multiple sclerosis. Brain J Neurol 138(Pt 7):1863–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Char DH, Ljung BM, Miller T et al (1998) Primary intraocular lymphoma (ocular reticulum cell sarcoma) diagnosis and management. Ophthalmology 95(5):625–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33145-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cassoux N, Merle-Berral H, Leblond V et al (2000) Ocular and central nervous system lymphoma: clinical features and diagnosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 8(4):243–250. https://doi.org/10.1076/ocii.8.4.243.6463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dalal M, Casady M, Moriarty E et al (2014) Diagnostic procedures in vitreoretinal lymphoma. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 22(4):270–276. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2013.848905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Canovi S, Campioli D (2016) Accuracy of flow cytometry and cytomorphology for the diagnosis of meningeal involvement in lymphoid neoplasms: a systematic review. Diagn Cytopathol 44(10):841–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bazewicz M, Lhoir S, Makhoul D et al (2021) Neurosyphilis cerebrospinal fluid findings in patients with ocular syphilis. Ocul. Immunol Inflamm 29(1):95–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2019.1672193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Workowski KA, Bolan GA (2015) Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 64(RR-03):1–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rupprecht TA, Pfister HW (2009) What are the indications for lumbar puncture in patients with Lyme disease? Curr Probl Dermatol 37:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1159/000213078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Eldin C, Raffetin A, Bouiller K et al (2019) Review of European and American guidelines for the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Med Mal Infect 49(2):121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2018.11.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Towler HM, Lightman S (2000) Symptomatic intraocular inflammation in multiple sclerosis. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 28(2):97–102. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9071.2000.00270.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zein G, Berta A, Foster CS, Multiple sclerosis-associated uveitis, (2004) Ocul Immunol Inflamm 12(2):137–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273940490895344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Obenauf CD, Shaw HE, Sydnor CF et al (1978) Sarcoidosis and its ophthalmic manifestations. Am J Ophthalmol 86(5):648–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(78)90184-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jabs DA, Johns CJ (1986) Ocular involvement in chronic sarcoidosis. A. J Ophthalmol 102(3):297–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(86)90001-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Anshu A, Cheng CL, Chee SP (2008) Syphilitic uveitis: an Asian perspective. Br J Ophthalmol 92(5):594–597. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.133843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Malinowski SM, Pulido JS, Folk JC (1993) Long-term visual outcome and complications associated with pars planitis. Ophthalmology 100(6):818–824; discussion 825. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31567-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dana MR, Merayo-Lloves J, Schaumberg DA et al (1996) Prognosticators for visual outcome in sarcoid uveitis. Ophthalmology 103(11):1846–1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30417-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RB, PS, and AG were the principal investigators; they conceived and designed the study. NC and RB collected data. All authors interpreted the data and approved the manuscript. RB and AG drafted the manuscript. PS, TM, YJ, and LK reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Sève.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study received approval from the ethics committee of the French Society of Ophtalmology.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 80 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernier, R., Gavoille, A., Chirpaz, N. et al. Diagnostic value of lumbar puncture for the etiological assessment of uveitis: a retrospective cohort of 188 patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 1651–1662 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05514-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05514-4

Keywords

Navigation