Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic ability of the new area-based parameter retinal nerve fiber layer to disc ratio (RDR) for discriminating between glaucoma and non-glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber layer defects (RNFLDs).
Methods
This retrospective cross-sectional study included 42 branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) eyes with RNFLD, 42 open-angle glaucoma (OAG) eyes, and 42 healthy control eyes that were matched with optic disc size. The RDR, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (pRNFLT), Bruch’s membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW), and Bruch’s membrane opening-minimum rim area (BMO-MRA) were analyzed. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated for each parameter.
Results
The OAG and BRVO groups had similar global pRNFLT (87.57 ± 7.07 µm and 89.71 ± 12.21 µm, respectively), but these were thinner than those of the healthy group (102.71 ± 8.95 µm, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). RDR was lowest in the BRVO group (0.755 ± 0.121, p < 0.001) and highest in the OAG group (1.111 ± 0.145, p < 0.001). Global BMO-MRW was significantly lower in the OAG group (194.36 ± 23.09 µm) than in the BRVO (269.69 ± 42.77 µm, p < 0.001) and healthy (273.48 ± 30.92 µm, p < 0.001) groups. Total BMO-MRA of the OAG group (0.88 ± 0.12 mm2) was significantly lower than that of the BRVO (1.32 ± 0.19 mm2, p < 0.001) and healthy (1.30 ± 0.21 mm2, p < 0.001) groups. AUC for discriminating between the OAG and BRVO was 0.986 for total BMO-MRA and 0.970 for RDR (p = 0.192).
Conclusion
In clinical practice, RDR may perform well as a parameter to distinguish between glaucoma and non-glaucomatous RNFLD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All research data is available and complies with standards.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR (1982) Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Archives of ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill : 1960) 100(1):135–146. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1982.01030030137016
Lopes de Faria JM, Russ H, Costa VP (2002) Retinal nerve fibre layer loss in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus without retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 86(7):725–728. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.7.725
Choplin NT (2006) Diabetes-associated retinal nerve fiber damage evaluated with scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 142 (6):1093; author reply 1093–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.017
Sugimoto M, Sasoh M, Ido M, Wakitani Y, Takahashi C, Uji Y (2005) Detection of early diabetic change with optical coherence tomography in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients without retinopathy. Ophthalmologica 219(6):379–385. https://doi.org/10.1159/000088382
Contreras I, Noval S, Rebolleda G, Munoz-Negrete FJ (2007) Follow-up of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 114(12):2338–2344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.042
Aggarwal D, Tan O, Huang D, Sadun AA (2012) Patterns of ganglion cell complex and nerve fiber layer loss in nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(8):4539–4545. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-9300
Gonul S, Koktekir BE, Bakbak B, Gedik S (2013) Comparison of the ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fibre layer measurements using Fourier domain optical coherence tomography to detect ganglion cell loss in non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. Br J Ophthalmol 97(8):1045–1050. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303438
Fard MA, Afzali M, Abdi P, Chen R, Yaseri M, Azaripour E, Moghimi S (2016) Optic nerve head morphology in nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy compared to open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57(11):4632–4640. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-19442
Kim CS, Shin KS, Lee HJ, Jo YJ, Kim JY (2014) Sectoral retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in branch retinal vein occlusion. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 34(3):525–530. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182a2e746
Alshareef RA, Barteselli G, You Q, Goud A, Jabeen A, Rao HL, Jabeen A, Chhablani J (2016) In vivo evaluation of retinal ganglion cells degeneration in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol 100(11):1506–1510. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-308106
Gmeiner JM, Schrems WA, Mardin CY, Laemmer R, Kruse FE, Schrems-Hoesl LM (2016) Comparison of Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in early glaucoma assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57(9):OCT575-584. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18906
Imamoglu S, Celik NB, Sevim MS, Pekel G, Ercalik NY, TurksevenKumral E, Bardak H (2017) Structure-function relationship between the Bruch membrane opening-based minimum rim width and visual field defects in advanced glaucoma. J Glaucoma 26(6):561–565. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000675
Reis ASC, Zangalli CES, Abe RY, Silva AL, Vianna JR, Vasconcellos JPC, Costa VP (2017) Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width measurements with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol 95(7):e548–e555. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13464
Enders P, Adler W, Schaub F, Hermann MM, Dietlein T, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM (2016) Novel Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim area equalizes disc size dependency and offers high diagnostic power for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57(15):6596–6603. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-20561
Gardiner SK, Ren R, Yang H, Fortune B, Burgoyne CF, Demirel S (2014) A method to estimate the amount of neuroretinal rim tissue in glaucoma: comparison with current methods for measuring rim area. Am J Ophthalmol 157(3):540–549-e541–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.11.007
Enders P, Adler W, Kiessling D, Weber V, Schaub F, Hermann MM, Dietlein T, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM (2019) Evaluation of two-dimensional Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim area for glaucoma diagnostics in a large patient cohort. Acta Ophthalmol 97(1):60–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13698
Resch H, Mitsch C, Pereira I, Schwarzhans F, Wasserman L, Hommer A, Reitner A, Vass C (2018) Optic nerve head morphology in primary open-angle glaucoma and nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol 96(8):e1018–e1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13804
Lee EJ, Han JC, Park DY, Kee C (2019) Difference in topographic pattern of prelaminar and neuroretinal rim thinning between nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 60(7):2461–2467. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.19-26891
Lee EJ, Choi YJ, Kim TW, Hwang JM (2016) Comparison of the deep optic nerve head structure between normal-tension glaucoma and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0150242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150242
Perez-Sarriegui A, Munoz-Negrete FJ, Noval S, De Juan V, Rebolleda G (2018) Automated evaluation of choroidal thickness and minimum rim width thickness in nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. J Neuroophthalmol 38(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000571
Rebolleda G, García-Montesinos J, De Dompablo E, Oblanca N, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, González-López JJ (2017) Bruch’s membrane opening changes and lamina cribrosa displacement in non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. Br J Ophthalmol 101(2):143–149. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307945
Chan CK, Cheng AC, Leung CK, Cheung CY, Yung AY, Gong B, Lam DS (2009) Quantitative assessment of optic nerve head morphology and retinal nerve fibre layer in non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy with optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoloscopy. Br J Ophthalmol 93(6):731–735. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.143297
Strahlman ER, Quinlan PM, Enger C, Elman MJ (1989) The cup-to-disc ratio and central retinal vein occlusion. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill : 1960) 107(4):524–525. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010538026
Wanichwecharungruang B, Jaksataphorn P, Yuttitham K, Vanichvaranont S, Harncharoen K (2011) Optic disc area and diameter of the central retinal vein occlusion fellow eyes, determined by optical coherence tomography. J Med Ass Thai = Chotmaihet thangphaet 94(Suppl 2):S76-80
Ravalico G, BattagliaParodi M (1991) Cup/disk ratio in branch retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmologica 203(2):53–56. https://doi.org/10.1159/000310226
Chen MJ (2020) Normal tension glaucoma in Asia: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 10:250–254. https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_30_20
Killer HE, Pircher A (2018) Normal tension glaucoma: review of current understanding and mechanisms of the pathogenesis. Eye (Lond) 32:924–930. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0042-2
Patel N, McAllister F, Pardon L, Harwerth R (2018) The effects of graded intraocular pressure challenge on the optic nerve head. Exp Eye Res 169:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2018.01.025
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study design: K.I.N., P.S.P.
Collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data: Y.A., K.I.N.
Preparation of manuscript: Y.A., K.I.N.
Review and approval of manuscript: all.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
Author P.S.P. was supported by the Korean Association of Retinal Degeneration.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Sung Pyo Park and Kyeong Ik Na contributed equally as corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
An, Y., Park, S.P. & Na, K.I. Novel area-based optic nerve head parameter to distinguish glaucoma from non-glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber layer defect in branch retinal vein occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 235–246 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05341-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05341-7