Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transnasal or transglabellar semicircular flap for medial canthal reconstruction

  • Oculoplastics and Orbit
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To review the results of medial canthal reconstruction with the medial (transnasal or transglabellar) semicircular flap.

Methods

Medical charts of 38 patients who underwent the described procedure were reviewed. After tumor excision, a semicircular flap created along the nasal bridge or glabella was advanced to the canthal defect; if necessary, this flap was combined with other reconstructive methods.

Results

The patients (19 male, 19 female; mean age, 66 years) had basal cell (n = 36) or squamous cell (n = 2) carcinomas. The mean tumor diameter was 9.2 mm (range, 3–21 mm). Tumor epicenters were in the midcanthal area in 21 patients (55%) and in the infra- or supracanthal areas in 17 patients (45%). After excision, 22 patients had only canthal defects, and 16 had an associated upper and/or lower eyelid defect. To cover the defect, the medial semicircular flap alone was used in 19 patients (50%) and in association with other flaps in 19 patients (50%). The excisional defect was primarily closed in 37 patients (97%). Flap necrosis or infection did not occur. During follow-up (range, 1–91 months; median, 19 months), 10 patients (26%) developed a total of 17 complications. Three patients (8%) required secondary surgery for eyelid reconstruction–related complications.

Conclusions

Transnasal or transglabellar semicircular flap may be a good alternative for medial canthal reconstruction. For large or complex defects, the medial semicircular flap can be combined with other periocular flaps. In the latter case, postoperative complications requiring secondary surgery may develop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cook BE, Bartley GB (1999) Epidemiologic characteristics and clinical course of patients with malignant eyelid tumors in an incidence cohort in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Ophthalmology 106:746–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maloof AJ, Leatherbarrow B (2000) The glabellar flap dissected. Eye 14:597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ng SGJ, Inkster CF, Leatherbarrow B (2001) The rhomboid flap in medial canthal reconstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 85:556–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sullivan TJ, Bray LC (1995) The bilobed flap in medial canthal reconstruction. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 23:42–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehta JS, Olver JM (2006) Infraglabellar transnasal bilobed flap in the reconstruction of medial canthal defects. Arch Ophthalmol 124:111–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Perry JD, Taban M (2009) Superiorly based bilobed flap for inferior medial canthal and nasojugal fold defect reconstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 25:276–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jelks GW, Glat PM, Jelks EB, Longaker MT (2002) Medial canthal reconstruction using a medially based upper eyelid myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1636–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee BJ, Elner SG, Douglas RS, Elner VM (2011) Island pedicle and horizontal advancement cheek flaps for medial canthal reconstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 27:376–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JH, Kim JM, Park JW et al (2013) Reconstruction of the medial canthus using an ipsilateral paramedian forehead flap. Arch Plast Surg 40:742–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart CM, Norris JH (2018) Reconstruction of extensive medial canthal defects using a single V-Y, island pedicle flap. Orbit 37:331–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Custer PL (1994) Trans-nasal flap for medial canthal reconstruction. Ophthalmic Surg 25:601–603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sciscio A, Joshi N (2001) The transnasal advancement flap: a technique for medial canthal area defects. Orbit 20:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malhotra R, Huilgol SC, Huynh NT, Selva D (2004) The Australian Mohs database, part I: periocular basal cell carcinoma experience over 7 years. Ophthalmology 111:624–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giordano Resti A, Sacconi R, Baccelli N, Bandello F (2014) Outcome of 110 basal cell carcinomas of the eyelid treated with frozen section-controlled excision: mean follow-up over 5 years. Eur J Ophthalmol 24:476–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shafi F, Rathore D, Johnson A et al (2017) Medial canthal defects following tumor excision: to reconstruct or not to reconstruct? Orbit 36:64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lowry JC, Bartley GB, Garrity JA (1997) The role of second intention healing in periocular reconstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 13:174–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Müllner K, Langmann H, Haas A (1995) Reconstruction of the medial canthal area by laissez-faire. Orbit 14:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Madge SN, Malhotra R, Thaller VT et al (2009) A systematic approach to the oculoplastic reconstruction of the eyelid medial canthal region after cancer excision. Int Ophthalmol Clin 49:173–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patrinely JR, Marines HM, Anderson RL (1987) Skin flaps in periorbital reconstruction. Surv Ophthalmol 31:249–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mustardé JC (2009) V-Y glabellar skin flap to the medial canthal region. In: Strauch B et al (ed) Grabb’s Encyclopedia of Flaps, vol 1. 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia, pp 79–82

  21. Bertelmann E, Rieck P, Guthoff R (2006) Medial canthal reconstruction by a modified glabellar flap. Ophthalmologica 220:368–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meadows AE, Manners RM (2003) A simple modification of the glabellar flap in medial canthal reconstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 19:313–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Turgut G, Ozcan A, Yeşiloğlu N, Baş L (2009) A new glabellar flap modification for the reconstruction of medial canthal and nasal dorsal defects: “flap in flap” technique. J Craniofac Surg 20:198–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moretti EA, Gomez Garcia F (1998) Myocutanous flap (V-Y design) from the nasal bridge for medial canthal reconstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 14:298–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rajabi MT, Hosseini SS, Rajabi MB, Tabatabaie SZ (2016) A novel technique for full thickness medial canthal reconstruction; playing with broken lines. J Curr Ophthalmol 28:212–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Baker SR (2014) Fundamentals. In: Baker SR (ed) Local Flaps in Facial Reconstruction, 3rd edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 108–130

    Google Scholar 

  27. LoPiccolo MC (2015) Rotation flaps: principles and locations. Dermatol Surg 41:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lo CH, Kimble FW (2008) The ideal rotation flap: an experimental study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:754–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Throckmorton GS, Williams FC, Potter JK, Finn R (2010) The geometry of skin flap rotation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2545–2548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gonzales-Ulloa M, Castillo A, Stevens E et al (1954) Preliminary study of the total restoration of the facial skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 13:151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fattahi TT (2003) An overview of facial aesthetic units. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:1207–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Harris GJ, Logani SC (1998) Multiple aesthetic unit flaps for medial canthal reconstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 14:352–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Levine MR, Buckman G (1986) Semicircular flap revisited. Arch Ophthalmol 104:915–917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yildirim S, Aköz T, Akan M, Cakir B (2001) The use of combined nasolabial V-Y advancement and glabellar flaps for large medial canthal defects. Dermatol Surg 27:215–218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bulent Yazici.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study has been approved by the Uludag University Ethics Committee.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and animal rights

This work involved demographic and clinical information of human participants. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ethics committee and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki, 1964 and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent has been obtained from all study participants.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yazici, B., Yuksel, N.O., Turgay, T. et al. Transnasal or transglabellar semicircular flap for medial canthal reconstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 259, 3769–3776 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05307-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05307-9

Keywords

Navigation