Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ocular fixation and macular integrity by microperimetry in multiple sclerosis

  • Neurophthalmology
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize the fixation and macular integrity of subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS) with and without previous optic neuritis (ON) using microperimetry (MP).

Methods

Fifty-five eyes of MS patients, subdivided into three groups (28 eyes without ON, 16 with previous ON, and 11 eyes with previous ON in the contralateral eye), and 43 healthy eyes were enrolled (January–November 2018). All cases were evaluated using the MAIA microperimeter (Centervue), analyzing the following parameters: average macular threshold (AT), fixation indexes (P1 and P2), bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) for 95% and 63% of points, and horizontal (H) and vertical (V) axes of the ellipse of fixation.

Results

All MS groups showed a significant reduced AT compared with the control group (p < 0.001). This reduction was more representative (p < 0.001) in eyes with previous ON. No statistically significant differences were found between MS patients with and without previous ON (p > 0.05). Mean AT was correlated with the examination time in all three groups (between ρ = − 0.798 p < 0.001 and ρ = − 0.49 p < 0.001). Significant differences in fixation parameters were only found between control and MS with ON groups (p < 0.02). The ratio of the disease showed a significant correlation with fixation parameters in MS groups (p < 0.02), but not with AT.

Conclusions

In MS patients, macular sensitivity is altered, especially in eyes with previous ON. Likewise, a fixational instability is present in MS patients with ON, with more increase of the V axis of the fixation area than of the H. The ratio of the disease also affects the patient fixation pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA et al (2014) Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis. Am Acad Neurol 83:278–286

    Google Scholar 

  2. Serra A, Chisari CG, Matta M (2018) Eye movement abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis, modeling, and treatment. Front Neurol 9:31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pozzilli C, Tomassini V, Marinelli F, Paolillo A, Gasperini C, Bastianello S (2003) “Gender gap” in multiple sclerosis: magnetic resonance imaging evidence. Eur J Neurol 10:95–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Galetta KM, Balcer LJ (2013) Measures of visual pathway structure and function in MS: clinical usefulness and role for MS trials. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2:172–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Villoslada P, Cuneo A, Gelfand J, Hauser SL, Green A (2012) Color vision is strongly associated with retinal thinning in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 18:991–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng H, Laron M, Schiffman JS, Tang RA, Frishman LJ (2007) The relationship between visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:5798–5805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cerovski B, Vidović T, Petricek I et al (2005) Multiple sclerosis and neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations. Coll Antropol 29(Suppl 1):153–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhatia I, Lukhmana S, Singh D, Menon V, Sharma P, Saxena R (2016) Microperimetry in optic neuritis. Ophthalmol Open J 1:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan JW (2002) Optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 10:161–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Molina-Martín A, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Piñero DP (2018) Current clinical application of Microperimetry: a review. Semin Ophthalmol 33:620–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Markowitz SN, Reyes SV (2013) Microperimetry and clinical practice: an evidence-based review. Can J Ophthalmol 48:350–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Molina-Martín A, Piñero DP, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ (2015) Decreased perifoveal sensitivity detected by microperimetry in patients using hydroxychloroquine and without visual field and fundoscopic anomalies. J Ophthalmol 2015:10–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarita-Nistor L, González EG, Markowitz SN, Steinbach SM (2008) Fixation characteristics of patients with macular degeneration recorded with the mp-1 microperimeter. Retina 28:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Montesano G, Gervasoni A, Ferri P et al (2017) Structure-function relationship in early diabetic retinopathy: a spatial correlation analysis with OCT and microperimetry. Eye 31:931–939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanchez-Dalmau B, Martinez-Lapiscina EH, Torres-Torres R et al (2018) Early retinal atrophy predicts long-term visual impairment after acute optic neuritis. Mult Scler J 24:1196–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Molina A, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Ruiz-Fortes P, Laria C, Piñero DP (2013) Utility of microperimetry in nystagmus: a case report. Can J Ophthalmol 48:103–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Molina-Martín A, Piñero DP, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ (2015) Fixation pattern analysis with microperimetry in nystagmus patients. Can J Ophthalmol 50:413–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martín AM, Piñero DP, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ (2017) Normal values for microperimetry with the MAIA microperimeter: sensitivity and fixation analysis in healthy adults and children. Eur J Ophthalmol 27:607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ioyleva E, Krivosheeva M (2015) Microperimetry in the diagnosis of the first manifestation of optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 357(2015):e47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Romano MR, Angi M, Romano F (2007) Macular sensitivity change in multiple sclerosis followed with microperimetry. Eur J Ophthalmol 17:441–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mañago MM, Schenkman M, Berliner J, Hebert JR (2017) Gaze stabilization and dynamic visual acuity in people with multiple sclerosis. J Vestib Res 26(5–6):469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Subramanian PS (2018) Fixation instability: a new measure of neurologic dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 59:202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mallery RM, Poolman P, Thurtell MJ et al (2018) Visual fixation instability in multiple sclerosis measured using SLO-OCT. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 59:196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nij Bijvank JA, Petzold A, Coric D et al (2019) Quantification of visual fixation in multiple sclerosis. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 60:1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Krupp LB, Alvarez LA, LaRocca NG, Scheinberg LC (1988) Fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 45:435–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lima VC, Prata TS, De Moraes CGV et al (2010) A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects. Br J Ophthalmol 94:64–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cennamo G, Romano MR, Vecchio EC et al (2016) Anatomical and functional retinal changes in multiple sclerosis. Eye (Lond) 30:456–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bsteh G, Hegen H, Altmann P et al (2020) Validation of inter-eye difference thresholds in optical coherence tomography for identification of optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 45:102403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Davion JB, Lopes R, Drumez É et al (2020) Asymptomatic optic nerve lesions: an underestimated cause of silent retinal atrophy in MS. Neurology 94:2468–2478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Khalil DH, Said MM, Abdelhakim MASE, Labeeb DM (2017) OCT and visual field changes as useful markers for follow-up of axonal loss in multiple sclerosis in Egyptian patients. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 25:315–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Raz N, Chokron S, Ben-Hur T, Levin N (2013) Temporal reorganization to overcome monocular demyelination. Neurology 81:702–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author David P Piñero has been supported by the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness of Spain within the program Ramón y Cajal, RYC-2016-20471. No additional funding was received for the performance of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David P. Piñero Llorens.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the ethics committee of the University of Valencia (Valencia, Spain) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Disclosure

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in the medical devices that are involved in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gil-Casas, A., Piñero Llorens, D.P. & Molina-Martin, A. Ocular fixation and macular integrity by microperimetry in multiple sclerosis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 259, 157–164 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04948-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04948-6

Keywords

Navigation