Skip to main content
Log in

Conjunctival bacterial flora and their antibiotic sensitivity among patients scheduled for cataract surgery in a tertiary hospital in south-east Nigeria

  • Cataract
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the pre-operative conjunctival bacteria flora and their antibiotic susceptibility among patients scheduled for cataract surgery.

Methods

A descriptive, cross-sectional, hospital-based study design was adopted. It involved 104 consecutive, consented patients scheduled for cataract surgery at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu, from June to September 2017. The participants’ socio-demographic characteristics, medical, and social history were obtained through interviewer-administered questionnaire. Conjunctival swab was obtained from the inferior fornix of the eye scheduled for cataract surgery using sterile swab stick and transported to medical laboratory for analysis. Susceptibility tests were carried out on the representatives of different groups of available antibiotics. Data was analyzed using the SPSS version 23.

Result

The participants were mainly females (64.4%), married, and farmers, with at least primary school education and a mean age of 64 ± 2SD years. The conjunctival swab bacteria isolation rate was 36.5%. Gram-positive bacteria accounted for 73.7% of the total isolates. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (34.2%) was the most frequently isolated bacteria. Gentamicin, ofloxacin, and polymycin B (76%) were the most efficacious antibiotics followed by moxifloxacin and tobramycin (68%) on all the isolates. Ofloxacin (82%) was the most sensitive to Gram positive while gentamicin (90%) was for Gram-negative bacteria.

Conclusion

In Enugu, the most common pre-operative conjunctival bacteria isolated were Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus with varied antibiotic sensitivity. Routine prophylaxis with gentamicin and ofloxacin is therefore advised to forestall the dreaded post-operative endophthalmitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available.

References

  1. Mariotti S, Pascolini D (2012) Visual impairment, vision loss and blindness 2010 global estimates, and VI and blindness causes. Global data on visual impairments 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 96(5):614–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahdi AM, Rabiu M, Gilbert C, Sivasubramaniam S, Murthy GV, Ezelum C, Entekume G (2014) Nigeria National Blindness and Visual Impairment Study Group. Prevalence and risk factors for lens opacities in Nigeria: results of the national blindness and low vision survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55(4):2642–2651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Speaker MG, Milch FA, Shah MK, Eisner W, Kreiswirth BN (1991) Role of external bacterial flora in the pathogenesis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 98:639–649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Results of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (1995) A randomized trial of immediate vitrectomy and of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 113(12):1479–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haggag M, Ali MI, Eweis M, Hassanein B (2011) Microflora isolated from preoperative conjunctivas, the prevalence of methicilin-resistant Staphylococci and their antibiotic profile. J Am Sci 7(12):579–584

    Google Scholar 

  6. Suto C, Morinaga M, Yagi T, Tsuji C, Toshida H (2012) Conjunctival sac bacterial flora isolated prior to cataract surgery. Infect Drug Resist 5:37–42

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Omotoye OJ, Adeoye AO, Owoeye JF (2011) Conjuctival bacterial flora and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in cataract surgery patients. Niger J Ophthalmol 19:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karthika N, Neelima A (2014) A study of normal bacterial flora of the conjunctiva in patients undergoing cataract surgery in a rural teaching hospital in R.R. district. J Sci Innov Res 3(2):164–167

    Google Scholar 

  9. Semanyenzi SE, Abahuji E (2013) Normal conjuctival flora as seen in adult patients at Kigali University Teaching Hospital. Rwanda Med J 70(2):43–47

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tiago EA, Ronald FC, Maria FD, Maiara SS, Joao LN, Celia MM, Barbosa C (2006) Conjunctival bacterial flora and antibiotic resistance pattern in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Arq Bras Oftalmol 69:33–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Terrence L, Mario JV, Ruben LB (2009) Ocular bacterial flora and antibiotic sensitivity among Filipino patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. Philipp J Ophthalmol 34(1):19–22

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kudva AA, Kadri R, Bhandary R, Hegde SK, Achar A, Devika P, Serrao V (2012) A study of normal bacterial flora of the conjunctiva of patients undergoing cataract surgery to select the best pre-operative topical antibiotic. Int J A J Inst Med Sci 1:139–142

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bremond-Gignac D, Chiambaretta F, Milazzo S (2011) A European perspective on topical antibiotics: current and evolving options. Ophthalmol Eye Dis 3:29–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institutes (CSLI) (2014) Performance standards for antimicribial susceptibility testing; twenty fourth information supplement. CSLI document M100-S24. Wayne Pennsylvania, USA. pp 176–188

  15. World Health Organization (2003) Manual for the laboratory identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial pathogens of public health concern in the developing world. http://www.who/cds/csr/rmd/2003.6. Accessed 17 Apr 2017

  16. Javed EA, Sultan M, Mehmood RQ (2008) Normal conjunctival flora. APMC 2(1):17–20

    Google Scholar 

  17. Olson R, Donnenfeld E, Bucci FA Jr, Price FW Jr, Raizman M, Solomon K, Devgan U, Trattler W, Dell S, Wallace RB (2010) Methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus species among health care and nonhealth care workers undergoing cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 4:1505–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Keshav BR, Basu S (2012) Normal conjunctival flora and their antibiotic sensitivity in Omanis undergoing cataract surgery. Oman J Ophthalmol 5:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contribution statements

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Cyril Mamah, Samuel Ebede, and Stella Ngozi Onwubiko. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Stella Ngozi Onwubiko and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stella Ngozi Onwubiko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Ethics approval

This was obtained from the ethics committee of University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mamah, C.C., Anyalebechi, O.C., Onwubiko, S.N. et al. Conjunctival bacterial flora and their antibiotic sensitivity among patients scheduled for cataract surgery in a tertiary hospital in south-east Nigeria. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 259, 443–448 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04926-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04926-y

Keywords

Navigation