Abstract
Purpose
To assess the safety, efficacy, and complication rate of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with congenital uveal coloboma and to evaluate the role of pupilloplasty.
Methods
A retrospective review of 41 eyes (31 patients) with congenital coloboma that underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation between September 2012 and September 2018. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected for analysis.
Results
The mean patient age at surgery was 53.9 years (range 15–82). The primary indication for surgery was cataract removal for visual improvement, and lens subluxation was additionally present in two eyes (5%) preoperatively. The mean preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.90 LogMAR. Phacoemulsification surgery was performed in all cases and nine eyes (22%) had pupilloplasty for pupil reconstitution at the time of the procedure. Surgeon grade varied from trainee surgeon under supervision to consultant. Eight patients (19.5%) had posterior capsular rupture (PCR) with or without vitreous loss requiring anterior vitrectomy. Of these, 2 cases (5%) had dropped nuclear fragments requiring subsequent pars plana vitrectomy and lens fragment removal. The mean postoperative CDVA was 0.62 LogMAR (p = 0.0003).
Conclusion
Patients with iridolenticular choroidal coloboma appear to be more at risk of complications, as were cases performed by non-consultant surgeons. Contrary, patients with phakodonesis, preoperative anterior chamber vitreous, dense cataracts, and cases were iris hooks used had no significant difference at PCR rate. The risk of postoperative glare and pupilloplasty needs to be considered in cases with good visual potential to avoid a possible second procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- IOL:
-
Intraocular lens
- AC:
-
Anterior chamber
- PCR:
-
Posterior capsule rupture
- PCO:
-
Posterior capsule opacification
References
Mann I (1957) Developmental abnormalities of the eye. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 81–103
Bermejo E, Martinez-Frias ML (1998) Congenital eye malformations: clinical epidemiological analysis of 1,124,654 consecutive births in Spain. Am J Med Genet 75:497–504
Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Roth MP (1997) Congenital eye malformations in 212,479 consecutive births. Ann Genet 40:122–128
Porges Y, Gershoni-Baruch R, Leibu R, Goldscher D, Zonis S, Shapira I, Miller B (1992) Hereditary microphthalmia with colobomatous cyst. Am J Ophthalmol 114:30–34
Hornby SJ, Adolph S, Gilbert CE, Dandona L, Foster A (2000) Visual acuity in children with coloboma: clinical features and a new phenotypic classification system. Ophthalmology 107:511–520
Duke-Elder S (1933) Textbook of ophthalmology. Vol. 2: Congenital and developmental anomalies. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby, pp. 1237e414
Mohamed A, Chaurasia S, Ramappa M, Sangwan VS, Jalali S (2014) Lenticular changes in congenital iridolenticular choroidal coloboma. Am J Ophthalmol 158(4):827–830.e2
Day AC, Khawaja AP, Tunde P, Hayat S, Luben R, Broadway DC, Khaw KT, Foster PJ (2013) The small eye phenotype in the EPIC-Norfolk eye study: prevalence and visual impairment in microphthalmos and nanophthalmos. BMJ Open 3(7):e003280
Elder MJ (1994) Aetiology of severe visual impairment and blindness in microphthalmos. Br J Ophthalmol 78:332e4
Jesberg DO, Schepens CL (1961) Retinal detachment associated with coloboma of the choroid. Arch Ophthalmol 65:163–173
Chaurasia S, Ramappa M, Sangwan VS (2012) Cataract surgery in eyes with congenital iridolenticular choroidal coloboma. Br J Ophthalmol 96(1):138–140
Khokhar S, Gupta S, Kusumesh R, Kumar G (2013) Outcomes of phacoemulsification in eyes with congenital choroidal coloboma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:2489–2490
Sahay P, Maharana PK, Mandal S, Sinha R, Agarwal T, Sharma N, Titival JS (2019) Cataract surgery outcomes in eyes with chorioretinal coloboma. J Cataract Refract Surg 45(5):630–638
Nordland ML, Sugar A, Moroi SE (2000) Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens placement in eyes with cataract and congenital coloboma: Visual acuity and complications. J Cataract Refract Surg 26(7):1035–1040
Jaffe NS, Clayman HM (1987) Cataract extraction in eyes with congenital coloboma. J Cataract Refrect Surg 13(1):54–58
Warburg M (1993) Classification of microphthalmos and coloboma. J Med Genet 30(8):664–669
Cionni RJ, Karatza EC, Osher RH, Shah M (2006) Surgical technique for congenital iris coloboma repair. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:1913–1916
Johnston R, Day AC, Donachiel P, Sparrow J (2019) The Royal College of Ophthalmologists National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 4, equity of access to cataract surgery. Eye (Lond). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0524-x
Funding
This study was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (reference: CA18/CT/04-154) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Disclaimer
The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of the NHS, the NIHR, HQIP, or the Department of Health.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phylactou, M., Matarazzo, F., Day, A.C. et al. Cataract surgery in eyes with congenital ocular coloboma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258, 2753–2759 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04915-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04915-1