Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term clinical results of trabectome surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the 72-month clinical results of trabectome surgery (TOM) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), secondary OAG and childhood glaucoma.

Method

A total of 305 eyes from 249 glaucoma patients were analyzed in the current retrospective single-center study. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed using three criteria: criterion A (postoperative intraocular pressure [IOP] ≤ 21 mmHg and ≥ 20% reduction from baseline IOP); criterion B (postoperative IOP ≤ 18 mmHg and ≥ 20% reduction from baseline IOP); and criterion C (postoperative IOP ≤ 16 mmHg and ≥ 20% reduction from baseline IOP). The changes in IOP, medication score, success probability, results of the multivariate analysis for success and failure risk factors, and complications were analyzed.

Results

The baseline IOP in all glaucoma patients decreased from 29.2 ± 9.8 mmHg with a 5.3 ± 1.7 medication score to 16.4 ± 5.8 mmHg (− 43.8%) with a 4.2 ± 1.5 medication score at 72 months (p < 0.01). The success probabilities in all cases for 72 months based on criterion A, B, and C were 44%, 35%, and 17%, respectively. For criterion A, no significant differences were found in the success probability according to the glaucoma subtype for 72 months. The combined surgical procedure significantly decreased the failure risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59). On the other hand, the presence of POAG (HR: 1.6) and a history of past selective laser trabeculoplasty (HR: 2.2) significantly increased failure risk. One patient (0.3%) demonstrated endophthalmitis after TOM but recovered through appropriate treatment.

Conclusion

At the 72-month time point, approximately half of the glaucoma patients maintained an IOP ≤ 21 mmHg with ≥ 20% IOP reduction. TOM is a safe surgery but may not yield sufficient IOP reduction in patients who have received SLT or have POAG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Minckler D, Baerveldt G, Ramirez MA, Mosaed S, Wilson R, Shaarawy T, Zack B, Dustin L, Francis B (2006) Clinical results with the trabectome, a novel surgical device for treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 104:40–50

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Maeda M, Watanabe M, Ichikawa K (2013) Evaluation of trabectome in open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 22:205–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182311b92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shoji N, Kasahara M, Iijima A, Takahashi M, Tatsui S, Matsumura K, Morita T, Shimizu K (2016) Short-term evaluation of trabectome surgery performed on Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 60:156–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-016-0433-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mosaed S (2014) The first decade of global trabectome outcomes. Eur Ophthalmic Rev 08:113–119. https://doi.org/10.17925/EOR.2014.08.02.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Avar M, Jordan JF, Neuburger M, Engesser D, Lubke J, Anton A, Wecker T (2019) Long-term follow-up of intraocular pressure and pressure-lowering medication in patients after ab-interno trabeculectomy with the Trabectome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257:997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04259-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Esfandiari H, Shah P, Torkian P, Conner IP, Schuman JS, Hassanpour K, Loewen NA (2019) Five-year clinical outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and trabectome surgery at a single glaucoma center. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257:357–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4146-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially Rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  8. Minckler D, Mosaed S, Francis B, Loewen N, Weinreb RN (2014) Clinical results of ab interno trabeculotomy using the Trabectome for open-angle glaucoma: the mayo clinic series in Rochester, Minnesota. Am J Ophthalmol 157:1325–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bendel RE, Patterson MT (2018) Long-term effectiveness of trabectome (ab-interno trabeculectomy) surgery. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 12:119–124. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1256

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Pahlitzsch M, Davids AM, Zorn M, Torun N, Winterhalter S, Maier AB, Klamann MK, Bertelmann E (2018) Three-year results of ab interno trabeculectomy (trabectome): Berlin study group. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256:611–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3882-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Minckler D, Mosaed S, Dustin L, Ms BF (2008) Trabectome (trabeculectomy-internal approach): additional experience and extended follow-up. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 106:149–159 discussion 159-160

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahuja Y, Ma Khin Pyi S, Malihi M, Hodge DO, Sit AJ (2013) Clinical results of ab interno trabeculotomy using the trabectome for open-angle glaucoma: the Mayo Clinic series in Rochester, Minnesota. Am J Ophthalmol 156:927–935.e922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.06.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ting JL, Damji KF, Stiles MC (2012) Ab interno trabeculectomy: outcomes in exfoliation versus primary open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.08.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thorleifsson G, Magnusson KP, Sulem P, Walters GB, Gudbjartsson DF, Stefansson H, Jonsson T, Jonasdottir A, Jonasdottir A, Stefansdottir G, Masson G, Hardarson GA, Petursson H, Arnarsson A, Motallebipour M, Wallerman O, Wadelius C, Gulcher JR, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kong A, Jonasson F, Stefansson K (2007) Common sequence variants in the LOXL1 gene confer susceptibility to exfoliation glaucoma. Science 317:1397–1400. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Streeten BW, Li ZY, Wallace RN, Eagle RC Jr, Keshgegian AA (1992) Pseudoexfoliative fibrillopathy in visceral organs of a patient with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 110:1757–1762. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1992.01080240097039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vogiatzis A, Marshall GE, Konstas AG, Lee WR (1994) Immunogold study of non-collagenous matrix components in normal and exfoliative iris. Br J Ophthalmol 78:850–858. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.78.11.850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Dörfler S, Naumann GO (1992) Immunohistochemical localization of basement membrane components in pseudoexfoliation material of the lens capsule. Curr Eye Res 11:343–355. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713689209001788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang N, Chintala SK, Fini ME, Schuman JS (2003) Ultrasound activates the TM ELAM-1/IL-1/NF-kappaB response: a potential mechanism for intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1977–1981. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.02-0631

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tham CCY, Kwong YYY, Leung DYL, Lam SW, Li FCH, Chiu TYH, Chan JCH, Lam DSC, Lai JSM (2010) Phacoemulsification vs phacotrabeculectomy in chronic angle-closure glaucoma with cataract: complications [corrected]. Arch Ophthalmol 128:303–311. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang HS, Lee J, Choi S (2013) Ocular biometric parameters associated with intraocular pressure reduction after cataract surgery in normal eyes. Am j Ophthalmol 156:89–94.e81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.02.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuusniemi A-M, Lindbohm N, Allinen P, Koskinen M, Harju M (2020) Ab interno trabeculotomy: key prognostic factors. J Glaucoma 29:211–216. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Okeke CO, Miller-Ellis E, Rojas M (2017) Trabectome success factors. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e7061. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000007061

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jordan JF, Wecker T, van Oterendorp C, Anton A, Reinhard T, Boehringer D, Neuburger M (2013) Trabectome surgery for primary and secondary open angle glaucomas. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:2753–2760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2500-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenquist R, Epstein D, Melamed S, Johnson M, Grant WM (1989) Outflow resistance of enucleated human eyes at two different perfusion pressures and different extents of trabeculotomy. Curr Eye Res 8:1233–1240. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713688909013902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Knepper P, Samples J (2016) Intraocular pressure control through linked trabecular meshwork and collector channel motion. Glaucoma Research and Clinical Advances 2016 to 2018: 44-85

  26. Latina MA, Park C (1995) Selective targeting of trabecular meshwork cells: in vitro studies of pulsed and CW laser interactions. Exp Eye Res 60:359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-4835(05)80093-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alon S (2013) Selective laser trabeculoplasty: a clinical review. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 7:58–65. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1139

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaplowitz K, Bussel II, Honkanen R, Schuman JS, Loewen NA (2016) Review and meta-analysis of ab-interno trabeculectomy outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 100:594–600. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakata K, Inoue Y, Harada J, Maeda N, Watanabe H, Tano Y, Shimomura Y, Harino S, Sawa M (2000) A high incidence of Staphylococcus aureus colonization in the external eyes of patients with atopic dermatitis. Ophthalmology 107:2167–2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00406-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lavia C, Dallorto L, Maule M, Ceccarelli M, Fea AM (2017) Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 12:e0183142. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by a research fund at Kitasato University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Nobuyuki Shoji, Tetsuya Morita, Kazuhiro Matsumura, and Masayuki Kasahara. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yusuke Kono, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuyuki Shoji.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kitasato University.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kono, Y., Kasahara, M., Hirasawa, K. et al. Long-term clinical results of trabectome surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258, 2467–2476 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04897-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04897-0

Keywords

Navigation