Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optical coherence tomography analysis of patients with untreated diabetic macular edema

  • Medical Ophthalmology
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision loss. Diabetes patients with mild macular edema and good visual acuity are often observed carefully so that treatment can be instituted when central vision is threatened. Optimal frequency of monitoring of these patients is unknown. Our study aimed to gather more information to determine a safe interval for monitoring of patients with eyes that were not undergoing active treatment for DME and to correlate outcomes with clinical risk factors.

Methods

Study population: Ninety-seven eyes with optical coherence tomography (OCT) evidence of DME of 97 patients with diabetes. Study procedures: Retrospective review of medical records and macular OCT scans at a 6–12-month interval. Primary outcomes: Change in visual acuity and change in central subfield thickness (CSFT) between the initial and follow-up OCT scans.

Results

There was no significant change from median baseline visual acuity 6/9 (inter-quartile range 6/6–6/12) or from median baseline CSFT (290 μm, inter-quartile range 270–312 μm) over a median duration of 8 months (inter-quartile range 7–10 months). The numbers of eyes where CSFT had increased ≥ 25 μm, reduced ≥ 25 μm, or remained unchanged were 16 (16%), 6 (6%), and 74 (76%), respectively. Patients with hemoglobin A1c ≥ 8.5% were 5.7 times more likely to develop central subfield thickening (95% CI 1.1–30.1, P = 0.038).

Conclusions

Majority of eyes with DME on OCT had stable CSFT without treatment over a median duration of 8 months. Hemoglobin A1c may be useful for risk stratification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSFT:

Central subfield thickness

CSME:

Clinically significant macular edema

DME:

Diabetic macular edema

DR:

Diabetic retinopathy

DRCR:

Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research

ETDRS:

Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study

HbA1c:

Hemoglobin A1c

LogMAR:

Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution

OCT:

Optical coherence tomography

VA:

Visual acuity

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Das A, McGuire PG, Rangasamy S (2015) Diabetic macular edema: pathophysiology and novel therapeutic targets. Ophthalmology. 122(7):1375–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson MW (2009) Etiology and treatment of macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 147(1):11–21.e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell P, Wong TY (2014) Management paradigms for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 157(3):505–13.e8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Browning DJ, Fraser CM (2008) The predictive value of patient and eye characteristics on the course of subclinical diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 145(1):149–54. e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, Bressler NM, Miller KM, Beck RW, Bressler SB, Glassman AR et al (2012) Observational study of subclinical diabetic macular edema. Eye (Lond) 26(6):833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tejerina AN, Vujosevic S, Varano M, Egan C, Sivaprasad S, Menon G et al (2015) One-year progression of diabetic subclinical macular edema in eyes with mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy: location of the increase in retinal thickness. Ophthalmic Res 54(3):118–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pires I, Santos AR, Nunes S, Lobo C, Cunha-Vaz J (2013) Subclinical macular edema as a predictor of progression to clinically significant macular edema in type 2 diabetes. Ophthalmologica. 230(4):201–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiore T, Androudi S, Iaccheri B, Lupidi M, Fabrizio G, Fruttini D et al (2013) Repeatability and reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in diabetic patients with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Curr Eye Res 38(6):674–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ (1995) The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy XV. Ophthalmology. 102(1):7–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL (1984) The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 91(12):1464–1474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, Lamoureux EL, Kowalski JW, Bek T et al (2012) Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 35(3):556–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chew EY, Davis MD, Danis RP, Lovato JF, Perdue LH, Greven C et al (2014) The effects of medical management on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in persons with type 2 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 121(12):2443–2451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hikichi T, Fujio N, Akiba J, Azuma Y, Takahashi M, Yoshida A (1997) Association between the short term natural history of diabetic macular edema and the Vitreomacular relationship in type II diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmology. 104(3):473–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. C. Andrew Symons.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research 2007, The Melbourne Health Quality Assurance/Negligible Risk Research Project, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

No informed consent was sought from patients in this study as only patient records that were accessible to medical professionals were obtained and collected for this study in a non-identifiable manner. In addition, no patient contact was required for this study, and outcomes for patients were not affected by the study due to its retrospective nature.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Tan, M.H., Pomerleau, D. et al. Optical coherence tomography analysis of patients with untreated diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258, 653–661 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04549-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04549-y

Keywords

Navigation