Advertisement

Face memory deficits in subjects with eye diseases: a comparative analysis between glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration patients from a developing country

  • Livia S. Mazzoli
  • Carla N. Urata
  • Niro KasaharaEmail author
Glaucoma
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Older people present significant declines in face recognition with age. Spatial vision (high-contrast acuity) and age are the best predictors of face recognition. Visual disabilities are more common in the older population due to aging eye diseases. The purpose of the study was to compare the face recognition memory deficit between primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) patients living in a developing country.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional, observational study. The sample comprised 64 patients with POAG, 48 with ARMD, and 52 controls. All groups were matched for age, gender, comorbidity, and ethnic distribution. Evidence of cognitive impairment was ruled out and subjects with even mild cognitive impairment were not included in the study. After a complete eye examination including measurement of the best-corrected visual acuity, fundus evaluation, and automated visual field, all subjects underwent the Cambridge face memory test (CFMT). CFMT score in percentage (%) was the main outcome measure and data were compared with ANOVA.

Results

The mean age was 66.6 ± 9.2, 69.8 ± 9.3, and 63.4 ± 7.3 years, for POAG, ARMD, and controls, respectively (P = 0.152). Gender, ethnicity, and comorbidity were evenly distributed among the groups. The CFMT score was 53.3 ± 15.2%, 49.8 ± 14.2%, and 62.1 ± 15.9% for POAG, ARMD, and controls, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

ARMD and POAG patients have higher face recognition memory deficit as compared to normal controls. This might be due to a visual disability.

Keywords

Glaucoma Age-related macular degeneration Face perception 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Livia S. Mazzoli M.D. declares that she has no conflict of interest. Carla N. Urata, M.D. declares that she has no conflict of interest. Niro Kasahara, M.D. declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ramulu PY (2009) Glaucoma and disability: which tasks are affected, and at what stage of disease? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20:92–98CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bird AC, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Chisholm IH, Coscas G, Davis MD, de Jong PT, Klaver CC, Klein BE et al (1995) An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. The International ARM Epidemiological Study Group Surv Ophthalmol 39:367–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hogg RE, Chakravarthy U (2006) Visual function and dysfunction in early and late age-related maculopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res 25:249–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruce V, Young A (1986) Understanding face recognition. Br J Psychol 77:305–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferris SH, Crook T, Clark E, McCarthy M, Rae D (1980) Facial recognition memory deficits in normal aging and senile dementia. J Gerontol 35:707–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lamont AC, Stewart-Williams S, Podd J (2005) Face recognition and aging: effects of target age and memory load. Mem Cogn 33:1017–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ng KYY, Hon KYL, Lee TMC (2007) Ageing effect on face recognition. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr 2:93–98Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, Wacker RT (1991) Face recognition in age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32:2020–2029PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tejeria L, Harper RA, Artes PH, Dickinson CM (2002) Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device. Br J Ophthalmol 86:1019–1026CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barnes CS, De L'Aune W, Schuchard RA (2011) A test of face discrimination ability in aging and vision loss. Optom Vis Sci 88:188–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glen FC, Crabb DP, Smith ND, Burton R, Garway-Heath DF (2012) Do patients with glaucoma have difficulty recognizing faces? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:3629–3637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glen FC, Smith ND, Crabb DP (2013) Saccadic eye movements and face recognition performance in pacients with central glaucomatous visual field defects. Vis Res 82:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roux-Sibilon A, Rutge F, Aptel F, Attye A, Guyader N, Boucart M, Chiquet C, Peyrin C (2018) Scene and human face recognition in the central vision of patients with glaucoma. PLoS One 13:e0193465CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schafer A, Rouland JF, Peyrin C, Szaffarczyk S, Boucart M (2018) Glaucoma affects viewing distance for recognition of sex and facial expression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59:4921–4928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Health Profile: Brazil. http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/country-health-profile/brazil. Accessed 07 January 2019
  16. 16.
    Duchaine B, Nakayama K (2006) The Cambridge face memory test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychol 44:576–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heering A, Maurer D (2014) Face memory deficits in pacients deprived of early visual input by bilateral congenital cataracts. Dev Psychobiol 56:96–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taylor DJ, Smith ND, Binns AM, Crabb DP (2018) The effect of non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration on face recognition performance. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256:815–821CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR (1993) Clinical decisions in glaucoma. The CV Mosby co, St Louis, pp 52–61Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Owsley C, Sekular R, Boldt C (1981) Aging and low contrast vision: face perception. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 21:362–365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Owsley C, Sloane ME (1987) Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of 'real-world' targets. Br J Ophthalmol 17:791–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rubin GS, Schuchard RA (1989) Does contrast sensitivity predict face recognition performance in low vision observers? In: Noninvasive assessment of the visual system, technical digest series, vol 3. Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, pp 130–133Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bate S, Bennetts RJ (2014) The rehabilitation of face recognition impairments: a critical review and future directions. Front Hum Neurosci 8:491CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O'Donnell O (2007) Access to health care in developing countries: breaking down demand side barriers. Cad Saude Publica 23:2820–2834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cypel MC, Kasahara N, Atique D, Umbelino CC, Alcântara MPA, Seixas FS, Almeida GV, Mandia C Jr, Cohen R (2004) Quality of life in patients who live in a developing country. Int Ophthalmol 25:267–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Sao PauloSao PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical SciencesSao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations